H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Mario Ancic vs Jan Hernych H2H: 5-0
Mario Ancic holds a 5–0 lead over Jan Hernych in their ATP head-to-head. Across 5 main-draw meetings, Mario Ancic leads 3–0 on grass and 2–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Mario Ancic won the 2009 Zagreb semifinal 6-7(4) 6-3 7-6(9).
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
CRO
Age 42
Right-Handed
196 cm / 6'5"
H2H
5
–
0
5 main draw meetings
CZE
Age 47
Right-Handed
190 cm / 6'3"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 7, 2009* | Zagreb | ATP 250 | SF | Hard | Mario Ancic | 6-7(4) 6-3 7-6(9) | Jan Hernych | Match data |
| Jun 25, 2006* | S Hertogenbosch | ATP 250 | F | Grass | Mario Ancic | 6-0 5-7 7-5 | Jan Hernych | Match data |
| Jan 20, 2006* | Australian Open | Grand Slam | R64 | Hard | Mario Ancic | 6-1 6-4 6-4 | Jan Hernych | Match data |
| Jun 18, 2005* | S Hertogenbosch | ATP 250 | SF | Grass | Mario Ancic | 6-4 6-4 | Jan Hernych | Match data |
| Jun 9, 2005* | Queen's Club | ATP 250 | R32 | Grass | Mario Ancic | 6-4 6-4 | Jan Hernych | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mario Ancic | #475 | #7 | 2,075 | 2,019 | 193 | 124 | 60.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
| Jan Hernych | #1,606 | #59 | 1,157 | 1,780 | 79 | 115 | 40.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Mario Ancic | Jan Hernych | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | 2002 | 3–7 | 30.0% | #89 | 1,531 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 2003 | 14–18 | 43.8% | #74 | 1,621 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 2004 | 26–21 | 55.3% | #29 | 1,732 | 0 | 0 | 2000 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #272 | 1,485 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2005 | 42–23 | 64.6% | #21 | 1,798 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 2006 | 52–18 | 74.3% | #9 | 1,954 | 0 | 3 | 2002 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #214 | 1,475 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2007 | 13–10 | 56.5% | #83 | 1,880 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | 2008 | 29–17 | 63.0% | #36 | 1,903 | 0 | 3 | 2004 | 9–12 | 42.9% | #83 | 1,570 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2009 | 12–7 | 63.2% | #95 | 1,905 | 0 | 3 | 2005 | 18–22 | 45.0% | #74 | 1,622 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2010 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #478 | 1,866 | 0 | 3 | 2006 | 17–20 | 45.9% | #75 | 1,665 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2007 | 7–15 | 31.8% | #156 | 1,611 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2008 | 4–8 | 33.3% | #81 | 1,676 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2009 | 11–23 | 32.4% | #113 | 1,666 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2010 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #241 | 1,597 | 0 | 0 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2011 | 3–2 | 60.0% | #168 | 1,664 | 0 | 0 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2012 | 2–1 | 66.7% | #193 | 1,598 | 0 | 0 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2013 | 5–5 | 50.0% | #219 | 1,743 | 0 | 0 |
| 34 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2014 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #199 | 1,701 | 0 | 0 |
| 35 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2015 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #286 | 1,696 | 0 | 0 |
| 36 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2016 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #424 | 1,641 | 0 | 0 |