H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 07:16 UTC
Mario Ancic vs Jan Vacek H2H: 0-1
Jan Vacek holds a 1–0 lead over Mario Ancic in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Jan Vacek leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Jan Vacek won the 2002 Wimbledon second round 6-4 6-4 7-5.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
CRO
Age 42
Right-Handed
196 cm / 6'5"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
CZE
Age 50
Right-Handed
198 cm / 6'6"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 28, 2002* | Wimbledon | Grand Slam | R64 | Grass | Jan Vacek | 6-4 6-4 7-5 | Mario Ancic | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mario Ancic | #475 | #7 | 2,075 | 2,019 | 193 | 124 | 60.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
| Jan Vacek | #1,155 | #61 | 646 | 1,640 | 30 | 59 | 33.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Mario Ancic | Jan Vacek | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | 2002 | 3–7 | 30.0% | #89 | 1,531 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 2003 | 14–18 | 43.8% | #74 | 1,621 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 2004 | 26–21 | 55.3% | #29 | 1,732 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 2005 | 42–23 | 64.6% | #21 | 1,798 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 2006 | 52–18 | 74.3% | #9 | 1,954 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 2007 | 13–10 | 56.5% | #83 | 1,880 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | 2008 | 29–17 | 63.0% | #36 | 1,903 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 25 | 2009 | 12–7 | 63.2% | #95 | 1,905 | 0 | 3 | 2001 | 8–6 | 57.1% | #75 | 1,630 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | 2010 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #478 | 1,866 | 0 | 3 | 2002 | 10–24 | 29.4% | #110 | 1,554 | 0 | 1 |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2003 | 5–13 | 27.8% | #129 | 1,566 | 0 | 1 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2004 | 3–12 | 20.0% | #176 | 1,480 | 0 | 1 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2005 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #260 | 1,463 | 0 | 1 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2006 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #298 | 1,490 | 0 | 1 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2007 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #235 | 1,554 | 0 | 1 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2008 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #563 | 1,593 | 0 | 1 |