H2H data updated: 2026-09-02 00:00 UTC

Mario Ancic vs Juan Monaco H2H: 1-0

Mario Ancic holds a 1–0 lead over Juan Monaco in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Mario Ancic leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Mario Ancic won the 2008 Miami Open third round 7-6(5) 4-6 6-1.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Mario Ancic
CRO Age 42 Right-Handed 196 cm / 6'5"
H2H
1 – 0
1 main draw meetings
Juan Monaco
ARG Age 42 Right-Handed 185 cm / 6'1"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Mario Ancic #63 7-6(5) 4-6 6-1 Juan Monaco #19 Match data Apr 1, 2008* R32 Miami Open Masters 1000 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Mario Ancic #475 #7 2,075 2,019 193 125 60.7% 0 0 0 0 3 3
Juan Monaco #226 #10 2,775 2,052 327 260 55.7% 0 0 0 2 7 9

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Mario Ancic Juan Monaco
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
18 2002 3–7 30.0% #89 1,530 0 0 — — — — — — —
19 2003 14–18 43.8% #74 1,621 0 0 — — — — — — —
20 2004 26–22 54.2% #29 1,725 0 0 2004 16–12 57.1% #73 1,661 0 0
21 2005 42–23 64.6% #21 1,799 0 1 2005 18–25 41.9% #85 1,577 0 0
22 2006 52–18 74.3% #9 1,954 0 3 2006 18–23 43.9% #69 1,639 0 0
23 2007 13–10 56.5% #83 1,881 0 3 2007 41–19 68.3% #23 1,864 0 3
24 2008 29–17 63.0% #36 1,925 0 3 2008 27–21 56.2% #46 1,760 0 3
25 2009 12–7 63.2% #95 1,917 0 3 2009 34–24 58.6% #30 1,851 0 3
26 2010 2–3 40.0% #478 1,876 0 3 2010 28–18 60.9% #26 1,837 0 3
27 — — — — — — — 2011 26–24 52.0% #26 1,940 0 3
28 — — — — — — — 2012 37–18 67.3% #12 1,935 0 7
29 — — — — — — — 2013 22–21 51.2% #42 1,822 0 8
30 — — — — — — — 2014 22–19 53.7% #62 1,864 0 8
31 — — — — — — — 2015 21–19 52.5% #53 1,812 0 8
32 — — — — — — — 2016 17–14 54.8% #65 1,875 0 9
33 — — — — — — — 2017 0–3 0.0% #226 1,814 0 9

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Mario Ancic Juan Monaco
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
18 2002 2 5 7 28.6% — — — — 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 2003 9 13 22 40.9% 3 2 5 60.0% 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 2004 6 10 16 37.5% 6 5 11 54.5% 10 3 13 76.9% 4 4 8 50.0% 2004 2 3 5 40.0% 14 8 22 63.6% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
21 2005 24 13 37 64.9% 6 5 11 54.5% 9 2 11 81.8% 3 3 6 50.0% 2005 1 8 9 11.1% 14 14 28 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 3 2 5 60.0%
22 2006 24 11 35 68.6% 11 4 15 73.3% 9 1 10 90.0% 8 2 10 80.0% 2006 3 8 11 27.3% 15 15 30 50.0% — — — — — — — —
23 2007 12 9 21 57.1% — — — — — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% 2007 12 9 21 57.1% 28 8 36 77.8% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
24 2008 15 9 24 62.5% 6 5 11 54.5% 8 3 11 72.7% — — — — 2008 9 10 19 47.4% 18 10 28 64.3% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
25 2009 12 6 18 66.7% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 2009 7 10 17 41.2% 27 13 40 67.5% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
26 2010 2 2 4 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 2010 14 10 24 58.3% 14 8 22 63.6% — — — — — — — —
27 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2011 15 12 27 55.6% 11 11 22 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
28 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2012 12 10 22 54.5% 22 6 28 78.6% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — —
29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2013 2 7 9 22.2% 18 12 30 60.0% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — —
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2014 7 7 14 50.0% 15 12 27 55.6% — — — — — — — —
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2015 6 5 11 54.5% 14 12 26 53.8% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — —
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2016 6 7 13 46.2% 10 6 16 62.5% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2017 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
Career — 106 78 184 57.6% 32 23 55 58.2% 39 14 53 73.6% 16 10 26 61.5% — 96 108 204 47.1% 220 136 356 61.8% 7 11 18 38.9% 4 5 9 44.4%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 314/318 of Mario Ancic's and 578/587 of Juan Monaco's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Mario Ancic Juan Monaco
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
18 2002 8/10 7.0 6.0 49.1% 75.0% 44.7% 54.2% 29.0% 59.8% 38.4% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
19 2003 32/32 8.4 4.3 57.9% 72.2% 51.0% 55.3% 38.5% 63.0% 37.1% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
20 2004 47/48 9.5 3.2 62.3% 75.9% 55.0% 45.1% 40.3% 67.8% 37.9% 2004 28/28 1.9 2.5 66.9% 63.4% 48.9% 47.3% 47.8% 58.5% 41.8%
21 2005 65/65 11.3 2.8 61.8% 79.5% 52.0% 62.9% 46.7% 68.9% 37.4% 2005 42/43 2.0 2.1 65.5% 63.7% 50.7% 51.2% 43.6% 58.9% 37.4%
22 2006 70/70 9.1 2.0 62.7% 75.5% 53.5% 64.7% 44.0% 67.2% 37.3% 2006 41/41 1.9 1.8 64.0% 65.6% 52.2% 56.6% 40.4% 60.9% 40.3%
23 2007 23/23 8.3 1.7 63.5% 76.8% 53.0% 56.1% 42.7% 68.0% 35.4% 2007 60/60 3.2 1.9 65.2% 69.0% 56.6% 57.3% 50.6% 64.7% 41.1%
24 2008 45/46 9.2 2.3 62.9% 76.3% 53.6% 64.5% 39.8% 67.7% 37.1% 2008 46/48 2.7 1.9 64.8% 65.5% 51.6% 50.7% 43.9% 60.1% 41.8%
25 2009 19/19 7.6 1.3 60.0% 73.0% 57.8% 59.9% 30.8% 66.6% 37.2% 2009 58/58 1.9 2.0 68.0% 66.6% 53.2% 52.0% 48.6% 62.4% 42.9%
26 2010 5/5 8.0 2.6 59.8% 69.0% 42.0% 50.6% 42.4% 58.0% 31.3% 2010 46/46 3.4 2.5 65.3% 68.0% 52.0% 58.2% 45.8% 62.4% 40.7%
27 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2011 49/50 2.0 1.9 66.1% 66.1% 52.9% 57.1% 46.6% 61.4% 40.7%
28 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2012 53/55 1.7 2.0 67.7% 67.4% 52.8% 55.8% 45.5% 62.4% 43.2%
29 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2013 43/43 2.0 1.9 69.0% 65.2% 52.2% 50.8% 49.4% 61.4% 42.4%
30 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2014 41/41 1.9 1.6 69.8% 64.7% 54.8% 49.0% 45.9% 61.7% 41.1%
31 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2015 40/40 2.2 1.4 71.9% 64.4% 51.7% 59.5% 41.9% 60.6% 39.9%
32 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2016 28/31 1.9 1.1 74.5% 64.0% 55.4% 54.8% 39.6% 61.4% 40.7%
33 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2017 3/3 0.7 0.7 63.6% 60.5% 47.8% 52.2% 59.5% 55.8% 36.6%
Career — 314/318 9.3 2.7 61.5% 76.0% 53.0% 59.0% 41.5% 67.0% 37.2% — 578/587 2.2 1.9 67.3% 65.9% 52.8% 54.1% 45.8% 61.5% 41.1%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Mario Ancic Juan Monaco
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
18 2002 1531 113.3 -1.58 +0.50 0.955 48.9% -13 — +101 37.5% -0.50 2–2 (50%) 2–2 (50%) — +0.28 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 2003 1622 126.7 +0.21 +0.64 1.003 50.1% -36 -40 -47 46.1% -0.20 6–9 (40%) 8–12 (40%) — -0.08 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 2004 1725 141.5 +4.07 +1.16 1.178 52.4% -136 -28 +99 54.0% +0.48 6–9 (40%) 7–17 (29%) — -1.51 2004 1662 138.6 -2.03 +3.31 1.009 50.1% -131 +91 — 51.5% +0.16 6–3 (67%) 4–4 (50%) — -0.82
21 2005 1799 152.9 +5.24 +0.79 1.202 53.0% -15 -42 +132 64.8% +1.01 5–11 (31%) 18–11 (62%) — +2.76 2005 1577 124.6 -2.76 -0.23 0.912 48.2% -97 +112 — 42.0% -0.54 4–6 (40%) 5–9 (36%) — +0.19
22 2006 1954 149.4 +4.79 +0.38 1.138 52.3% -48 -50 +88 64.1% +0.94 21–2 (91%) 19–14 (58%) — +1.74 2006 1640 125.6 -0.75 +2.74 1.032 50.5% -158 +76 — 46.7% -0.17 3–8 (27%) 5–6 (45%) — -1.40
23 2007 1882 144.6 +3.39 -0.07 1.107 51.5% -14 — — 60.0% +0.82 2–3 (40%) 2–4 (33%) — +0.28 2007 1865 145.9 +1.71 +3.90 1.166 52.7% -172 +120 — 60.6% +0.84 16–6 (73%) 7–12 (37%) — +0.58
24 2008 1925 152.1 +4.71 +1.41 1.150 52.1% -36 -23 +173 58.0% +0.59 9–4 (69%) 11–11 (50%) — -4.16 2008 1760 137.9 -2.43 +3.95 1.049 50.9% -60 +159 — 55.5% +0.11 7–7 (50%) 9–6 (60%) — +1.07
25 2009 1918 145.3 +2.66 +1.24 1.114 51.2% +12 — — 55.3% +0.45 6–0 (100%) 4–4 (50%) — -0.19 2009 1852 157.8 -0.30 +5.86 1.140 52.3% -132 +156 — 57.5% +0.53 6–8 (43%) 7–8 (47%) — -2.94
26 2010 1877 117.6 -1.67 -1.63 0.746 45.6% +37 — — 33.3% -0.83 2–0 1–1 — -0.31 2010 1838 151.8 -0.23 +3.49 1.081 51.6% -17 +79 — 58.8% +0.54 9–8 (53%) 12–6 (67%) — +2.65
27 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2011 1940 155.8 -0.55 +4.02 1.054 50.7% +9 -75 — 51.3% +0.12 7–9 (44%) 8–9 (47%) — -0.04
28 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2012 1936 158.3 -0.31 +5.86 1.150 52.6% -29 +125 -371 62.2% +0.75 12–7 (63%) 11–7 (61%) — +2.18
29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2013 1822 149.5 -1.37 +4.76 1.098 51.6% -49 +142 -201 54.3% +0.49 4–10 (29%) 5–10 (33%) — +2.05
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2014 1864 149.5 -1.50 +3.48 1.073 51.0% -49 +48 — 52.9% +0.15 7–9 (44%) 9–9 (50%) — +0.07
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2015 1813 155.6 -2.84 +3.06 1.012 50.2% +34 +69 -157 51.0% +0.17 7–6 (54%) 3–11 (21%) — -0.21
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2016 1875 154.8 -1.63 +3.93 1.056 50.7% -44 +70 — 52.2% +0.15 4–1 (80%) 4–6 (40%) — -1.33
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2017 1814 105.4 -2.73 -1.34 0.827 45.7% — — — 14.3% -2.00 0–1 1–2 (33%) — -0.13
Career — 2019 150.9 +3.80 +0.75 1.125 51.9% -37 -37 +105 57.8% +0.60 59–40 (60%) 72–76 (49%) 106.1 -0.38 — 2053 154.7 -0.99 +3.80 1.069 51.1% -64 +97 -261 54.1% +0.29 92–89 (51%) 90–105 (46%) 96.3 +0.33

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.