Mario Ancic
all rivalries →| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Roger Federer | 1 | 6 | 7 | Jul 3, 2008 | H2H |
| Ivan Ljubicic | 1 | 5 | 6 | Mar 15, 2009 | H2H |
| Nikolay Davydenko | 2 | 4 | 6 | May 8, 2008 | H2H |
| Dominik Hrbaty | 5 | 1 | 6 | Jan 21, 2007 | H2H |
| Rafael Nadal | 1 | 4 | 5 | Mar 16, 2010 | H2H |
H2H data updated: 2026-10-22 00:00 UTC
Mario Ancic holds a 3–0 lead over Julien Benneteau in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Mario Ancic leads 1–0 on carpet and 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Mario Ancic won the 2010 Indian Wells Open second round 4-6 7-6(5) 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
| Player | Score | Player | Match Data | Date | Round | Tournament | Category | Surface |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mario Ancic | 4-6 7-6(5) 6-3 | Julien Benneteau | Match data | Mar 14, 2010* | R64 | Indian Wells Open | Masters 1000 | Hard |
| Mario Ancic | 6-3 6-1 | Julien Benneteau | Match data | Nov 4, 2006* | R16 | Paris Masters | Masters 1000 | Carpet |
| Mario Ancic | 4-6 7-6(8) 6-2 5-7 6-4 | Julien Benneteau | Match data | Jun 25, 2004* | R64 | Wimbledon | Grand Slam | Grass |
Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories | Finals | 500 including documented historical predecessor categories | 250 including documented historical predecessor categories | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mario Ancic | #475 | #7 | 2,075 | 2,019 | 193 | 125 | 60.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
| Julien Benneteau | #140 | #25 | 1,608 | 1,959 | 270 | 293 | 48.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Mario Ancic | Julien Benneteau | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | 2002 | 3–7 | 30.0% | #89 | 1,530 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 2003 | 14–18 | 43.8% | #74 | 1,621 | 0 | 0 | 2001 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #271 | 1,495 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2004 | 26–22 | 54.2% | #29 | 1,725 | 0 | 0 | 2002 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #253 | 1,452 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2005 | 42–23 | 64.6% | #21 | 1,799 | 0 | 1 | 2003 | 3–7 | 30.0% | #138 | 1,548 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2006 | 52–18 | 74.3% | #9 | 1,954 | 0 | 3 | 2004 | 14–15 | 48.3% | #65 | 1,637 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2007 | 13–10 | 56.5% | #83 | 1,881 | 0 | 3 | 2005 | 5–18 | 21.7% | #165 | 1,535 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2008 | 29–17 | 63.0% | #36 | 1,925 | 0 | 3 | 2006 | 24–22 | 52.2% | #40 | 1,707 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2009 | 12–7 | 63.2% | #95 | 1,917 | 0 | 3 | 2007 | 22–28 | 44.0% | #68 | 1,672 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2010 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #478 | 1,876 | 0 | 3 | 2008 | 22–20 | 52.4% | #43 | 1,786 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2009 | 26–28 | 48.1% | #46 | 1,794 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2010 | 24–19 | 55.8% | #44 | 1,854 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2011 | 21–21 | 50.0% | #52 | 1,872 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2012 | 27–22 | 55.1% | #35 | 1,883 | 0 | 0 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2013 | 27–25 | 51.9% | #35 | 1,863 | 0 | 0 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2014 | 25–22 | 53.2% | #25 | 1,895 | 0 | 0 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2015 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #527 | 1,800 | 0 | 0 |
| 34 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2016 | 7–14 | 33.3% | #130 | 1,806 | 0 | 0 |
| 35 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2017 | 13–13 | 50.0% | #56 | 1,863 | 0 | 0 |
| 36 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2018 | 8–11 | 42.1% | #140 | 1,806 | 0 | 0 |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.
| Age | Mario Ancic | Julien Benneteau | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | Carpet | Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | Carpet | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | |||
| 18 | 2002 | 2 | 5 | 7 | 28.6% | — | — | — | — | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 2003 | 9 | 13 | 22 | 40.9% | 3 | 2 | 5 | 60.0% | 2 | 3 | 5 | 40.0% | — | — | — | — | 2001 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% |
| 20 | 2004 | 6 | 10 | 16 | 37.5% | 6 | 5 | 11 | 54.5% | 10 | 3 | 13 | 76.9% | 4 | 4 | 8 | 50.0% | 2002 | — | — | — | — | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% |
| 21 | 2005 | 24 | 13 | 37 | 64.9% | 6 | 5 | 11 | 54.5% | 9 | 2 | 11 | 81.8% | 3 | 3 | 6 | 50.0% | 2003 | 2 | 5 | 7 | 28.6% | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 2006 | 24 | 11 | 35 | 68.6% | 11 | 4 | 15 | 73.3% | 9 | 1 | 10 | 90.0% | 8 | 2 | 10 | 80.0% | 2004 | 5 | 8 | 13 | 38.5% | 5 | 3 | 8 | 62.5% | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | 3 | 2 | 5 | 60.0% |
| 23 | 2007 | 12 | 9 | 21 | 57.1% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | 2005 | 3 | 7 | 10 | 30.0% | 1 | 6 | 7 | 14.3% | 1 | 3 | 4 | 25.0% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% |
| 24 | 2008 | 15 | 9 | 24 | 62.5% | 6 | 5 | 11 | 54.5% | 8 | 3 | 11 | 72.7% | — | — | — | — | 2006 | 14 | 12 | 26 | 53.8% | 4 | 4 | 8 | 50.0% | 2 | 3 | 5 | 40.0% | 4 | 3 | 7 | 57.1% |
| 25 | 2009 | 12 | 6 | 18 | 66.7% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2007 | 13 | 18 | 31 | 41.9% | 4 | 5 | 9 | 44.4% | 3 | 3 | 6 | 50.0% | 2 | 2 | 4 | 50.0% |
| 26 | 2010 | 2 | 2 | 4 | 50.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2008 | 10 | 13 | 23 | 43.5% | 7 | 3 | 10 | 70.0% | 1 | 3 | 4 | 25.0% | 4 | 1 | 5 | 80.0% |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2009 | 16 | 16 | 32 | 50.0% | 8 | 9 | 17 | 47.1% | 2 | 3 | 5 | 40.0% | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2010 | 14 | 11 | 25 | 56.0% | 3 | 5 | 8 | 37.5% | 7 | 3 | 10 | 70.0% | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2011 | 13 | 10 | 23 | 56.5% | 4 | 8 | 12 | 33.3% | 4 | 3 | 7 | 57.1% | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2012 | 19 | 15 | 34 | 55.9% | 4 | 3 | 7 | 57.1% | 4 | 4 | 8 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2013 | 21 | 17 | 38 | 55.3% | 3 | 5 | 8 | 37.5% | 3 | 3 | 6 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2014 | 22 | 16 | 38 | 57.9% | 1 | 3 | 4 | 25.0% | 2 | 3 | 5 | 40.0% | — | — | — | — |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2015 | 1 | 5 | 6 | 16.7% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 34 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2016 | 6 | 10 | 16 | 37.5% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | — | — | — | — |
| 35 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2017 | 10 | 9 | 19 | 52.6% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 3 | 3 | 6 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — |
| 36 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2018 | 5 | 6 | 11 | 45.5% | 1 | 3 | 4 | 25.0% | 2 | 2 | 4 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — |
| Career | — | 106 | 78 | 184 | 57.6% | 32 | 23 | 55 | 58.2% | 39 | 14 | 53 | 73.6% | 16 | 10 | 26 | 61.5% | — | 174 | 178 | 352 | 49.4% | 46 | 63 | 109 | 42.2% | 36 | 40 | 76 | 47.4% | 14 | 12 | 26 | 53.8% |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 314/318 of Mario Ancic's and 556/561 of Julien Benneteau's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.
| Age | Mario Ancic | Julien Benneteau | ||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Sample | Aces/M | DFs/M | 1st Sv% | 1st Pts% | 2nd Pts% | BP Saved% | BP Conv% | Svc Pts% | Ret Pts% | Yr | Sample | Aces/M | DFs/M | 1st Sv% | 1st Pts% | 2nd Pts% | BP Saved% | BP Conv% | Svc Pts% | Ret Pts% | |
| 18 | 2002 | 8/10 | 7.0 | 6.0 | 49.1% | 75.0% | 44.7% | 54.2% | 29.0% | 59.8% | 38.4% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 2003 | 32/32 | 8.4 | 4.3 | 57.9% | 72.2% | 51.0% | 55.3% | 38.5% | 63.0% | 37.1% | 2001 | 1/2 | 5.0 | 1.0 | 52.4% | 60.5% | 41.0% | 53.8% | 50.0% | 51.2% | 39.4% |
| 20 | 2004 | 47/48 | 9.5 | 3.2 | 62.3% | 75.9% | 55.0% | 45.1% | 40.3% | 67.8% | 37.9% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 2005 | 65/65 | 11.3 | 2.8 | 61.8% | 79.5% | 52.0% | 62.9% | 46.7% | 68.9% | 37.4% | 2003 | 10/10 | 2.7 | 2.8 | 63.9% | 60.1% | 47.6% | 47.1% | 29.1% | 55.7% | 35.4% |
| 22 | 2006 | 70/70 | 9.1 | 2.0 | 62.7% | 75.5% | 53.5% | 64.7% | 44.0% | 67.2% | 37.3% | 2004 | 29/29 | 3.9 | 3.3 | 62.3% | 68.8% | 48.6% | 55.1% | 39.6% | 61.2% | 36.9% |
| 23 | 2007 | 23/23 | 8.3 | 1.7 | 63.5% | 76.8% | 53.0% | 56.1% | 42.7% | 68.0% | 35.4% | 2005 | 23/23 | 3.7 | 2.8 | 64.2% | 64.0% | 42.8% | 58.6% | 39.5% | 56.5% | 36.3% |
| 24 | 2008 | 45/46 | 9.2 | 2.3 | 62.9% | 76.3% | 53.6% | 64.5% | 39.8% | 67.7% | 37.1% | 2006 | 46/46 | 5.4 | 3.1 | 67.2% | 66.8% | 48.4% | 59.4% | 38.9% | 60.6% | 37.6% |
| 25 | 2009 | 19/19 | 7.6 | 1.3 | 60.0% | 73.0% | 57.8% | 59.9% | 30.8% | 66.6% | 37.2% | 2007 | 50/50 | 4.3 | 3.1 | 64.6% | 66.5% | 52.5% | 54.8% | 38.9% | 61.5% | 37.2% |
| 26 | 2010 | 5/5 | 8.0 | 2.6 | 59.8% | 69.0% | 42.0% | 50.6% | 42.4% | 58.0% | 31.3% | 2008 | 41/42 | 4.3 | 3.3 | 64.1% | 70.0% | 50.6% | 57.6% | 37.4% | 63.1% | 37.9% |
| 27 | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2009 | 54/54 | 5.6 | 3.2 | 66.0% | 69.9% | 48.7% | 56.9% | 39.1% | 62.7% | 36.7% |
| 28 | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2010 | 43/43 | 7.0 | 3.7 | 65.7% | 69.6% | 47.9% | 56.5% | 40.0% | 62.0% | 36.4% |
| 29 | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2011 | 42/42 | 5.8 | 3.3 | 64.0% | 71.8% | 50.8% | 58.7% | 39.8% | 64.2% | 36.3% |
| 30 | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2012 | 47/49 | 6.9 | 4.0 | 65.7% | 71.0% | 50.4% | 55.1% | 46.8% | 63.8% | 38.1% |
| 31 | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2013 | 51/52 | 6.2 | 2.9 | 63.4% | 70.0% | 50.3% | 50.8% | 38.5% | 62.8% | 38.0% |
| 32 | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2014 | 47/47 | 7.6 | 2.9 | 64.6% | 73.1% | 50.9% | 62.1% | 40.7% | 65.0% | 35.9% |
| 33 | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2015 | 6/6 | 6.0 | 1.7 | 66.0% | 71.8% | 53.6% | 22.8% | 34.0% | 65.3% | 27.2% |
| 34 | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2016 | 21/21 | 7.9 | 3.0 | 62.1% | 69.6% | 53.4% | 59.6% | 33.2% | 63.2% | 34.9% |
| 35 | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2017 | 26/26 | 7.4 | 4.2 | 60.4% | 75.3% | 49.6% | 57.6% | 38.0% | 65.3% | 36.3% |
| 36 | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2018 | 19/19 | 10.1 | 6.0 | 58.3% | 70.2% | 45.7% | 58.1% | 37.7% | 59.9% | 34.8% |
| Career | — | 314/318 | 9.3 | 2.7 | 61.5% | 76.0% | 53.0% | 59.0% | 41.5% | 67.0% | 37.2% | — | 556/563 | 5.9 | 3.4 | 64.3% | 69.6% | 49.6% | 56.4% | 39.3% | 62.4% | 36.7% |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.
| Age | Mario Ancic | Julien Benneteau | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | |
| 18 | 2002 | 1531 | 113.2 | -1.58 | +0.50 | 0.955 | 48.9% | -13 | — | +101 | 37.5% | -0.50 | 2–2 (50%) | 2–2 (50%) | 102.2 | +0.28 | 2000 | 1498 | 100.5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 2003 | 1622 | 126.7 | +0.21 | +0.64 | 1.003 | 50.1% | -36 | -40 | -47 | 46.1% | -0.20 | 6–9 (40%) | 8–12 (40%) | 98.1 | -0.08 | 2001 | 1495 | 107.8 | -2.66 | +3.68 | 0.808 | 45.8% | — | — | — | 50.0% | +0.50 | — | — | — | +0.23 |
| 20 | 2004 | 1725 | 141.5 | +4.07 | +1.16 | 1.178 | 52.4% | -136 | -28 | +99 | 54.0% | +0.48 | 6–9 (40%) | 7–17 (29%) | 93.6 | -1.51 | 2002 | 1452 | 94.1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 0.0% | -3.80 | — | — | — | -0.09 |
| 21 | 2005 | 1799 | 152.9 | +5.24 | +0.79 | 1.202 | 53.0% | -15 | -42 | +132 | 64.8% | +1.01 | 5–11 (31%) | 18–11 (62%) | 98.9 | +2.76 | 2003 | 1548 | 113.3 | -3.92 | -1.10 | 0.798 | 45.3% | +23 | -61 | — | 26.9% | -1.73 | 2–0 | 2–0 | — | -0.28 |
| 22 | 2006 | 1954 | 149.4 | +4.79 | +0.38 | 1.138 | 52.3% | -48 | -50 | +88 | 64.1% | +0.94 | 21–2 (91%) | 19–14 (58%) | 115.9 | +1.74 | 2004 | 1638 | 129.1 | -1.57 | +1.46 | 0.952 | 48.9% | +6 | -44 | -85 | 48.6% | -0.22 | 3–4 (43%) | 1–7 (13%) | 95.9 | -0.41 |
| 23 | 2007 | 1882 | 144.6 | +3.39 | -0.07 | 1.107 | 51.5% | -14 | — | — | 60.0% | +0.82 | 2–3 (40%) | 2–4 (33%) | 98.7 | +0.28 | 2005 | 1536 | 119.2 | -3.91 | -0.41 | 0.835 | 46.9% | +40 | +10 | -13 | 27.8% | -1.39 | 0–4 (0%) | 0–3 (0%) | 92.2 | -0.33 |
| 24 | 2008 | 1925 | 152.1 | +4.71 | +1.41 | 1.150 | 52.1% | -36 | -23 | +173 | 58.0% | +0.59 | 9–4 (69%) | 11–11 (50%) | 102.1 | -4.16 | 2006 | 1707 | 133.9 | -1.05 | +0.70 | 0.955 | 49.2% | +20 | -94 | -191 | 47.5% | -0.30 | 10–5 (67%) | 13–11 (54%) | 108.1 | +0.54 |
| 25 | 2009 | 1918 | 145.3 | +2.66 | +1.24 | 1.114 | 51.2% | +12 | — | — | 55.3% | +0.45 | 6–0 (100%) | 4–4 (50%) | 104.4 | -0.19 | 2007 | 1673 | 130.1 | -1.22 | +0.55 | 0.965 | 49.2% | -11 | -88 | -162 | 46.0% | -0.36 | 7–10 (41%) | 11–8 (58%) | 99.7 | +1.04 |
| 26 | 2010 | 1877 | 117.6 | -1.67 | -1.63 | 0.746 | 45.6% | +37 | — | — | 33.3% | -0.83 | 2–0 | 1–1 | — | -0.31 | 2008 | 1787 | 143.1 | +0.15 | +2.10 | 1.026 | 50.2% | -39 | -21 | -283 | 48.6% | -0.27 | 7–7 (50%) | 8–3 (73%) | 105.9 | -3.04 |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2009 | 1794 | 145.6 | -0.39 | +0.68 | 0.985 | 49.7% | +29 | -82 | -256 | 46.5% | -0.08 | 15–11 (58%) | 8–13 (38%) | 101.6 | -0.56 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2010 | 1854 | 142.2 | -1.47 | +0.40 | 0.958 | 49.2% | -5 | -172 | -138 | 53.2% | -0.07 | 8–5 (62%) | 14–6 (70%) | 107.8 | -0.34 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2011 | 1872 | 143.5 | +0.78 | -0.62 | 1.014 | 50.1% | +21 | -182 | -112 | 48.6% | +0.05 | 8–8 (50%) | 9–8 (53%) | 99.4 | -0.79 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2012 | 1884 | 153.7 | +0.89 | +1.57 | 1.053 | 51.0% | -17 | -159 | -45 | 58.5% | +0.32 | 6–12 (33%) | 13–11 (54%) | 95.5 | -0.52 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2013 | 1863 | 155.8 | -0.38 | +1.63 | 1.020 | 50.1% | +13 | -119 | -42 | 52.3% | +0.05 | 3–10 (23%) | 14–10 (58%) | 95.0 | -0.69 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2014 | 1895 | 157.3 | +1.28 | +0.40 | 1.026 | 50.6% | +48 | -215 | -117 | 52.1% | +0.21 | 9–9 (50%) | 6–14 (30%) | 93.2 | +1.35 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2015 | 1800 | 109.3 | -0.93 | -2.34 | 0.783 | 45.6% | +20 | — | — | 25.0% | -1.50 | — | 1–1 | — | +0.34 |
| 34 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2016 | 1806 | 142.3 | -0.03 | -1.08 | 0.950 | 48.8% | -5 | — | -45 | 39.7% | -0.60 | 3–4 (43%) | 3–6 (33%) | 97.5 | -0.94 |
| 35 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2017 | 1863 | 143.0 | +1.12 | +0.87 | 1.046 | 50.7% | +23 | — | -101 | 50.8% | +0.16 | 4–5 (44%) | 4–6 (40%) | 99.1 | -0.93 |
| 36 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2018 | 1807 | 131.6 | -2.07 | -0.63 | 0.869 | 47.5% | -15 | -176 | +4 | 45.6% | -0.58 | 1–2 (33%) | 7–4 (64%) | 101.1 | -0.81 |
| Career | — | 2019 | 150.9 | +3.80 | +0.75 | 1.125 | 51.9% | -37 | -37 | +105 | 57.8% | +0.60 | 59–40 (60%) | 72–76 (49%) | 106.1 | -0.38 | — | 1960 | 148.1 | -0.48 | +0.63 | 0.977 | 49.5% | +9 | -103 | -115 | 48.0% | -0.19 | 86–96 (47%) | 114–111 (51%) | 99.8 | -1.11 |
Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.
| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Roger Federer | 1 | 6 | 7 | Jul 3, 2008 | H2H |
| Ivan Ljubicic | 1 | 5 | 6 | Mar 15, 2009 | H2H |
| Nikolay Davydenko | 2 | 4 | 6 | May 8, 2008 | H2H |
| Dominik Hrbaty | 5 | 1 | 6 | Jan 21, 2007 | H2H |
| Rafael Nadal | 1 | 4 | 5 | Mar 16, 2010 | H2H |
| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jo-Wilfried Tsonga | 5 | 6 | 11 | Nov 2, 2017 | H2H |
| David Ferrer | 5 | 6 | 11 | Aug 16, 2016 | H2H |
| Gilles Simon | 4 | 6 | 10 | Feb 24, 2017 | H2H |
| Feliciano Lopez | 5 | 4 | 9 | Feb 9, 2017 | H2H |
| Roger Federer | 2 | 6 | 8 | Oct 11, 2014 | H2H |