H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Mario Ancic vs Julien Benneteau H2H: 3-0
Mario Ancic holds a 3–0 lead over Julien Benneteau in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Mario Ancic leads 1–0 on carpet and 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Mario Ancic won the 2010 Indian Wells Masters second round 4-6 7-6(5) 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
CRO
Age 42
Right-Handed
196 cm / 6'5"
H2H
3
–
0
3 main draw meetings
FRA
Age 44
Right-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 14, 2010* | Indian Wells Masters | Masters 1000 | R64 | Hard | Mario Ancic | 4-6 7-6(5) 6-3 | Julien Benneteau | Match data |
| Nov 4, 2006* | Paris Masters | Masters 1000 | R16 | Carpet | Mario Ancic | 6-3 6-1 | Julien Benneteau | Match data |
| Jun 25, 2004* | Wimbledon | Grand Slam | R64 | Grass | Mario Ancic | 4-6 7-6(8) 6-2 5-7 6-4 | Julien Benneteau | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mario Ancic | #475 | #7 | 2,075 | 2,019 | 193 | 124 | 60.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
| Julien Benneteau | #140 | #25 | 1,608 | 1,955 | 269 | 292 | 48.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Mario Ancic | Julien Benneteau | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | 2002 | 3–7 | 30.0% | #89 | 1,531 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 2003 | 14–18 | 43.8% | #74 | 1,621 | 0 | 0 | 2001 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #271 | 1,495 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2004 | 26–21 | 55.3% | #29 | 1,732 | 0 | 0 | 2002 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #253 | 1,452 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2005 | 42–23 | 64.6% | #21 | 1,798 | 0 | 1 | 2003 | 3–7 | 30.0% | #138 | 1,547 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2006 | 52–18 | 74.3% | #9 | 1,954 | 0 | 3 | 2004 | 14–15 | 48.3% | #65 | 1,637 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2007 | 13–10 | 56.5% | #83 | 1,880 | 0 | 3 | 2005 | 5–18 | 21.7% | #165 | 1,533 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2008 | 29–17 | 63.0% | #36 | 1,903 | 0 | 3 | 2006 | 24–22 | 52.2% | #40 | 1,706 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2009 | 12–7 | 63.2% | #95 | 1,905 | 0 | 3 | 2007 | 22–28 | 44.0% | #68 | 1,672 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2010 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #478 | 1,866 | 0 | 3 | 2008 | 22–20 | 52.4% | #43 | 1,786 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2009 | 26–28 | 48.1% | #46 | 1,793 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2010 | 24–19 | 55.8% | #44 | 1,853 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2011 | 21–21 | 50.0% | #52 | 1,871 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2012 | 26–21 | 55.3% | #35 | 1,874 | 0 | 0 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2013 | 27–25 | 51.9% | #35 | 1,861 | 0 | 0 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2014 | 25–22 | 53.2% | #25 | 1,895 | 0 | 0 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2015 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #527 | 1,801 | 0 | 0 |
| 34 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2016 | 7–14 | 33.3% | #130 | 1,807 | 0 | 0 |
| 35 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2017 | 13–13 | 50.0% | #56 | 1,862 | 0 | 0 |
| 36 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2018 | 8–11 | 42.1% | #140 | 1,806 | 0 | 0 |