H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 07:16 UTC
Mario Ancic vs Luis Horna H2H: 2-0
Mario Ancic holds a 2–0 lead over Luis Horna in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Mario Ancic leads 1–0 on clay and 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Mario Ancic won the 2006 Rome Masters second round 6-4 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
CRO
Age 42
Right-Handed
196 cm / 6'5"
H2H
2
–
0
2 main draw meetings
PER
Age 45
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 10, 2006* | Rome Masters | Masters 1000 | R64 | Clay | Mario Ancic | 6-4 6-4 | Luis Horna | Match data |
| Jun 23, 2004* | Wimbledon | Grand Slam | R128 | Grass | Mario Ancic | 6-7(5) 6-4 6-3 6-4 | Luis Horna | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mario Ancic | #475 | #7 | 2,075 | 2,019 | 193 | 124 | 60.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
| Luis Horna | #1,009 | #33 | 945 | 1,789 | 113 | 139 | 44.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Mario Ancic | Luis Horna | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1998 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #299 | 1,493 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 2002 | 3–7 | 30.0% | #89 | 1,531 | 0 | 0 | 1999 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #180 | 1,482 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 2003 | 14–18 | 43.8% | #74 | 1,621 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 2004 | 26–21 | 55.3% | #29 | 1,732 | 0 | 0 | 2001 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #138 | 1,464 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2005 | 42–23 | 64.6% | #21 | 1,798 | 0 | 1 | 2002 | 6–8 | 42.9% | #85 | 1,511 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2006 | 52–18 | 74.3% | #9 | 1,954 | 0 | 3 | 2003 | 18–20 | 47.4% | #64 | 1,662 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2007 | 13–10 | 56.5% | #83 | 1,880 | 0 | 3 | 2004 | 30–27 | 52.6% | #38 | 1,736 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2008 | 29–17 | 63.0% | #36 | 1,903 | 0 | 3 | 2005 | 16–24 | 40.0% | #84 | 1,625 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2009 | 12–7 | 63.2% | #95 | 1,905 | 0 | 3 | 2006 | 17–22 | 43.6% | #63 | 1,603 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | 2010 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #478 | 1,866 | 0 | 3 | 2007 | 17–16 | 51.5% | #73 | 1,654 | 0 | 2 |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2008 | 8–16 | 33.3% | #108 | 1,592 | 0 | 2 |