H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC
Mario Ancic vs Magnus Larsson H2H: 0-1
Magnus Larsson holds a 1–0 lead over Mario Ancic in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Magnus Larsson leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Magnus Larsson won the 2002 Tokyo second round 7-6(4) 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
CRO
Age 42
Right-Handed
196 cm / 6'5"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
SWE
Age 56
Right-Handed
193 cm / 6'4"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 2, 2002* | Tokyo | ATP 250 | R64 | Hard | Magnus Larsson | 7-6(4) 6-2 | Mario Ancic | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mario Ancic | #475 | #7 | 2,075 | 2,019 | 193 | 124 | 60.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
| Magnus Larsson | #1,422 | #10 | 2,222 | 2,040 | 293 | 217 | 57.5% | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 6 | 7 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Mario Ancic | Magnus Larsson | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | 2002 | 3–7 | 30.0% | #89 | 1,531 | 0 | 0 | 1988 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #381 | 1,518 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 2003 | 14–18 | 43.8% | #74 | 1,621 | 0 | 0 | 1989 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #145 | 1,469 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2004 | 26–21 | 55.3% | #29 | 1,732 | 0 | 0 | 1990 | 15–9 | 62.5% | #56 | 1,680 | 0 | 1 |
| 21 | 2005 | 42–23 | 64.6% | #21 | 1,798 | 0 | 1 | 1991 | 21–21 | 50.0% | #61 | 1,718 | 0 | 1 |
| 22 | 2006 | 52–18 | 74.3% | #9 | 1,954 | 0 | 3 | 1992 | 27–19 | 58.7% | #34 | 1,802 | 0 | 3 |
| 23 | 2007 | 13–10 | 56.5% | #83 | 1,880 | 0 | 3 | 1993 | 29–25 | 53.7% | #39 | 1,820 | 0 | 3 |
| 24 | 2008 | 29–17 | 63.0% | #36 | 1,903 | 0 | 3 | 1994 | 36–21 | 63.2% | #19 | 2,004 | 0 | 6 |
| 25 | 2009 | 12–7 | 63.2% | #95 | 1,905 | 0 | 3 | 1995 | 32–13 | 71.1% | #17 | 1,932 | 0 | 6 |
| 26 | 2010 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #478 | 1,866 | 0 | 3 | 1996 | 26–23 | 53.1% | #46 | 1,765 | 0 | 6 |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1997 | 38–21 | 64.4% | #25 | 1,891 | 0 | 6 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1998 | 19–16 | 54.3% | #43 | 1,828 | 0 | 6 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1999 | 16–18 | 47.1% | #95 | 1,729 | 0 | 6 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2000 | 13–6 | 68.4% | #75 | 1,770 | 0 | 7 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2001 | 10–10 | 50.0% | #136 | 1,728 | 0 | 7 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2002 | 8–8 | 50.0% | #152 | 1,673 | 0 | 7 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2003 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #507 | 1,689 | 0 | 7 |