H2H data updated: 2026-09-06 00:00 UTC

Mario Ancic vs Marc Gicquel H2H: 1-0

Mario Ancic holds a 1–0 lead over Marc Gicquel in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Mario Ancic leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Mario Ancic won the 2007 Madrid Open first round 6-4 6-2.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Mario Ancic
CRO Age 42 Right-Handed 196 cm / 6'5"
H2H
1 – 0
1 main-draw meetings
Marc Gicquel
FRA Age 49 Right-Handed 188 cm / 6'2"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Mario Ancic #49 6-4 6-2 Marc Gicquel #77 Match data Oct 17, 2007* R64 Madrid Open Masters 1000 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Mario Ancic #475 #7 2,075 2,019 193 125 60.7% 0 0 0 0 3 3
Marc Gicquel #857 #37 1,448 1,787 92 113 44.9% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Mario Ancic Marc Gicquel
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
18 2002 3–7 30.0% #89 1,530 0 0 — — — — — — —
19 2003 14–18 43.8% #74 1,621 0 0 — — — — — — —
20 2004 26–22 54.2% #29 1,725 0 0 — — — — — — —
21 2005 42–23 64.6% #21 1,799 0 1 — — — — — — —
22 2006 52–18 74.3% #9 1,954 0 3 — — — — — — —
23 2007 13–10 56.5% #83 1,881 0 3 — — — — — — —
24 2008 29–17 63.0% #36 1,925 0 3 — — — — — — —
25 2009 12–7 63.2% #95 1,917 0 3 2002 1–1 50.0% #223 1,500 0 0
26 2010 2–3 40.0% #478 1,876 0 3 — — — — — — —
27 — — — — — — — 2004 1–2 33.3% #170 1,520 0 0
28 — — — — — — — 2005 3–2 60.0% #123 1,544 0 0
29 — — — — — — — 2006 17–12 58.6% #50 1,750 0 0
30 — — — — — — — 2007 21–25 45.7% #70 1,711 0 0
31 — — — — — — — 2008 21–24 46.7% #54 1,697 0 0
32 — — — — — — — 2009 21–25 45.7% #58 1,717 0 0
33 — — — — — — — 2010 5–12 29.4% #151 1,642 0 0
34 — — — — — — — 2011 0–3 0.0% #145 1,576 0 0
35 — — — — — — — 2012 0–1 0.0% #152 1,591 0 0
36 — — — — — — — 2013 0–5 0.0% #120 1,620 0 0
37 — — — — — — — 2014 2–1 66.7% #342 1,639 0 0

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Mario Ancic Marc Gicquel
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
18 2002 2 5 7 28.6% — — — — 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 2003 9 13 22 40.9% 3 2 5 60.0% 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 2004 6 10 16 37.5% 6 5 11 54.5% 10 3 13 76.9% 4 4 8 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
21 2005 24 13 37 64.9% 6 5 11 54.5% 9 2 11 81.8% 3 3 6 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
22 2006 24 11 35 68.6% 11 4 15 73.3% 9 1 10 90.0% 8 2 10 80.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
23 2007 12 9 21 57.1% — — — — — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
24 2008 15 9 24 62.5% 6 5 11 54.5% 8 3 11 72.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
25 2009 12 6 18 66.7% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 2002 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
26 2010 2 2 4 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
27 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2004 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
28 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2005 — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — 2 1 3 66.7%
29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2006 9 6 15 60.0% 4 4 8 50.0% — — — — 4 2 6 66.7%
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2007 5 12 17 29.4% 8 8 16 50.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 6 2 8 75.0%
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2008 8 13 21 38.1% 7 7 14 50.0% 6 3 9 66.7% 0 1 1 0.0%
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2009 13 16 29 44.8% 6 6 12 50.0% 2 3 5 40.0% — — — —
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2010 4 5 9 44.4% 0 3 3 0.0% 1 4 5 20.0% — — — —
34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2011 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
35 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2012 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
36 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2013 0 2 2 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
37 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2014 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 106 78 184 57.6% 32 23 55 58.2% 39 14 53 73.6% 16 10 26 61.5% — 43 59 102 42.2% 26 33 59 44.1% 11 15 26 42.3% 12 6 18 66.7%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 314/318 of Mario Ancic's and 205/205 of Marc Gicquel's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Mario Ancic Marc Gicquel
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
18 2002 8/10 7.0 6.0 49.1% 75.0% 44.7% 54.2% 29.0% 59.8% 38.4% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
19 2003 32/32 8.4 4.3 57.9% 72.2% 51.0% 55.3% 38.5% 63.0% 37.1% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
20 2004 47/48 9.5 3.2 62.3% 75.9% 55.0% 45.1% 40.3% 67.8% 37.9% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
21 2005 65/65 11.3 2.8 61.8% 79.5% 52.0% 62.9% 46.7% 68.9% 37.4% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
22 2006 70/70 9.1 2.0 62.7% 75.5% 53.5% 64.7% 44.0% 67.2% 37.3% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
23 2007 23/23 8.3 1.7 63.5% 76.8% 53.0% 56.1% 42.7% 68.0% 35.4% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
24 2008 45/46 9.2 2.3 62.9% 76.3% 53.6% 64.5% 39.8% 67.7% 37.1% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
25 2009 19/19 7.6 1.3 60.0% 73.0% 57.8% 59.9% 30.8% 66.6% 37.2% 2002 2/2 9.0 1.5 52.9% 72.9% 53.5% 87.5% 50.0% 63.1% 24.8%
26 2010 5/5 8.0 2.6 59.8% 69.0% 42.0% 50.6% 42.4% 58.0% 31.3% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
27 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2004 3/3 2.0 1.7 60.1% 62.3% 54.0% 15.7% 35.2% 59.0% 36.3%
28 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2005 5/5 4.8 1.8 63.1% 72.8% 48.4% 52.4% 44.6% 64.0% 41.1%
29 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2006 29/29 6.8 1.6 54.9% 75.8% 50.6% 66.8% 37.8% 64.1% 36.7%
30 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2007 46/46 6.0 1.9 57.9% 74.2% 50.2% 59.6% 38.2% 63.8% 34.8%
31 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2008 45/45 6.8 2.2 58.5% 73.2% 49.1% 62.8% 43.5% 63.2% 36.4%
32 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2009 46/46 5.8 2.8 55.7% 73.1% 51.9% 65.3% 39.3% 63.8% 37.0%
33 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2010 17/17 5.4 2.7 54.0% 69.5% 48.9% 50.4% 46.6% 59.4% 34.6%
34 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2011 3/3 4.3 4.3 53.8% 71.8% 52.6% 40.3% 27.8% 62.6% 28.2%
35 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2012 1/1 4.0 2.0 61.4% 72.5% 50.0% 42.9% 40.0% 63.9% 42.2%
36 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2013 5/5 3.2 3.8 53.0% 61.9% 43.9% 58.1% 39.2% 52.9% 27.8%
37 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2014 3/3 7.7 1.0 64.8% 77.5% 53.7% 53.6% 41.9% 69.0% 40.0%
Career — 314/318 9.3 2.7 61.5% 76.0% 53.0% 59.0% 41.5% 67.0% 37.2% — 205/205 6.0 2.3 56.8% 73.0% 50.3% 60.8% 40.4% 63.1% 35.8%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Mario Ancic Marc Gicquel
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
18 2002 1531 113.3 -1.58 +0.50 0.955 48.9% -13 — +101 37.5% -0.50 2–2 (50%) 2–2 (50%) 102.2 +0.28 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 2003 1622 126.7 +0.21 +0.64 1.003 50.1% -36 -40 -47 46.1% -0.20 6–9 (40%) 8–12 (40%) 98.1 -0.08 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 2004 1725 141.5 +4.07 +1.16 1.178 52.4% -136 -28 +99 54.0% +0.48 6–9 (40%) 7–17 (29%) 93.6 -1.51 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
21 2005 1799 152.9 +5.24 +0.79 1.202 53.0% -15 -42 +132 64.8% +1.01 5–11 (31%) 18–11 (62%) 98.9 +2.76 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
22 2006 1954 149.4 +4.79 +0.38 1.138 52.3% -48 -50 +88 64.1% +0.94 21–2 (91%) 19–14 (58%) 115.9 +1.74 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
23 2007 1882 144.6 +3.39 -0.07 1.107 51.5% -14 — — 60.0% +0.82 2–3 (40%) 2–4 (33%) 98.7 +0.28 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
24 2008 1925 152.1 +4.71 +1.41 1.150 52.1% -36 -23 +173 58.0% +0.59 9–4 (69%) 11–11 (50%) 102.1 -4.16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
25 2009 1918 145.3 +2.66 +1.24 1.114 51.2% +12 — — 55.3% +0.45 6–0 (100%) 4–4 (50%) 104.4 -0.19 2002 1501 101.9 +0.60 -0.57 0.672 47.2% — — — 50.0% -0.25 — 0–1 — +0.17
26 2010 1877 117.6 -1.67 -1.63 0.746 45.6% +37 — — 33.3% -0.83 2–0 1–1 — -0.31 2003 1471 94.2 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
27 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2004 1520 105.8 -1.54 -0.60 0.885 47.3% — — — 33.3% -1.00 1–0 1–1 — +0.55
28 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2005 1544 107.2 +1.50 +0.12 1.141 52.0% +14 — — 54.5% +0.27 1–0 — — 0.00
29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2006 1750 135.4 +1.93 -0.94 1.024 50.4% -8 -166 — 58.9% +0.30 5–4 (56%) 8–7 (53%) 102.6 +0.08
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2007 1711 135.5 +0.72 -1.60 0.962 49.2% +21 -89 -185 45.9% -0.15 7–6 (54%) 9–6 (60%) 104.0 -0.22
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2008 1697 134.8 +0.16 -0.18 0.988 49.9% -51 -11 +5 45.9% -0.16 4–8 (33%) 10–9 (53%) 96.8 +0.69
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2009 1718 138.5 +0.34 +0.15 1.022 50.3% -16 -6 -26 49.1% -0.07 4–8 (33%) 6–7 (46%) 96.3 +0.21
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2010 1643 123.6 -2.04 -2.07 0.852 47.8% +67 -11 -42 35.0% -0.90 0–2 4–3 (57%) — -0.86
34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2011 1576 104.0 -0.75 -0.94 0.755 45.2% — — — 10.0% -1.70 — 0–1 — +0.29
35 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2012 1592 108.8 +2.93 -4.09 1.168 52.6% — — — 33.3% +0.33 0–1 — — -0.07
36 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2013 1621 111.9 -3.55 -2.25 0.591 41.8% — — — 0.0% -3.08 — 0–2 — +0.06
37 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2014 1640 117.0 +2.04 +0.21 1.292 53.2% +39 — — 71.4% +0.86 0–1 2–1 (67%) — -0.13
Career — 2019 150.9 +3.80 +0.75 1.125 51.9% -37 -37 +105 57.8% +0.60 59–40 (60%) 72–76 (49%) 106.1 -0.38 — 1787 131.8 +0.34 -0.77 0.970 49.5% -4 -57 -51 46.1% -0.22 22–30 (42%) 40–38 (51%) 99.1 +0.38

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.