H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 07:16 UTC
Mario Ancic vs Marc Gicquel H2H: 1-0
Mario Ancic holds a 1–0 lead over Marc Gicquel in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Mario Ancic leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Mario Ancic won the 2007 Madrid Masters second round 6-4 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
CRO
Age 42
Right-Handed
196 cm / 6'5"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
FRA
Age 49
Right-Handed
188 cm / 6'2"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 17, 2007* | Madrid Masters | Masters 1000 | R64 | Hard | Mario Ancic | 6-4 6-2 | Marc Gicquel | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mario Ancic | #475 | #7 | 2,075 | 2,019 | 193 | 124 | 60.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
| Marc Gicquel | #857 | #37 | 1,448 | 1,785 | 92 | 113 | 44.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Mario Ancic | Marc Gicquel | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | 2002 | 3–7 | 30.0% | #89 | 1,531 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 2003 | 14–18 | 43.8% | #74 | 1,621 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 2004 | 26–21 | 55.3% | #29 | 1,732 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 2005 | 42–23 | 64.6% | #21 | 1,798 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 2006 | 52–18 | 74.3% | #9 | 1,954 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 2007 | 13–10 | 56.5% | #83 | 1,880 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | 2008 | 29–17 | 63.0% | #36 | 1,903 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 25 | 2009 | 12–7 | 63.2% | #95 | 1,905 | 0 | 3 | 2002 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #223 | 1,500 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2010 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #478 | 1,866 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2004 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #170 | 1,519 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2005 | 3–2 | 60.0% | #123 | 1,544 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2006 | 17–12 | 58.6% | #50 | 1,750 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2007 | 21–25 | 45.7% | #70 | 1,710 | 0 | 0 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2008 | 21–24 | 46.7% | #54 | 1,696 | 0 | 0 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2009 | 21–25 | 45.7% | #58 | 1,717 | 0 | 0 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2010 | 5–12 | 29.4% | #151 | 1,642 | 0 | 0 |
| 34 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2011 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #145 | 1,576 | 0 | 0 |
| 35 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2012 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #152 | 1,591 | 0 | 0 |
| 36 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2013 | 0–5 | 0.0% | #120 | 1,621 | 0 | 0 |
| 37 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2014 | 2–1 | 66.7% | #342 | 1,639 | 0 | 0 |