H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 07:16 UTC

Mario Ancic vs Marcos Baghdatis H2H: 4-1

Mario Ancic holds a 4–1 lead over Marcos Baghdatis in their ATP head-to-head. Across 5 main-draw meetings, Mario Ancic leads 3–1 on hard courts and 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Mario Ancic won the 2008 Marseille semifinal 6-4 6-2.

CRO Age 42 Right-Handed 196 cm / 6'5"
H2H
4 1
5 main draw meetings
CYP Age 41 Right-Handed 183 cm / 6'0"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Feb 16, 2008* Marseille ATP 250 SF Hard Mario Ancic #135 6-4 6-2 Marcos Baghdatis #17 Match data
Sep 17, 2006* Beijing ATP 250 F Hard Marcos Baghdatis #9 6-4 6-0 Mario Ancic #12 Match data
Jun 24, 2006* S Hertogenbosch ATP 250 SF Grass Mario Ancic #12 7-6(4) 6-3 Marcos Baghdatis #17 Match data
Feb 16, 2006* Marseille ATP 250 R32 Hard Mario Ancic #21 6-2 6-7(9) 6-4 Marcos Baghdatis #27 Match data
Oct 8, 2005* Tokyo ATP 250 QF Hard Mario Ancic #24 6-1 7-6(4) Marcos Baghdatis #81 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Mario Ancic #475 #7 2,075 2,019 193 124 60.9% 0 0 0 0 3 3
Marcos Baghdatis #179 #8 2,111 1,952 324 272 54.4% 0 0 0 0 4 4

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Mario Ancic Marcos Baghdatis
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
18 2002 3–7 30.0% #89 1,531 0 0
19 2003 14–18 43.8% #74 1,621 0 0 2004 1–1 50.0% #159 1,559 0 0
20 2004 26–21 55.3% #29 1,732 0 0 2005 11–12 47.8% #55 1,694 0 0
21 2005 42–23 64.6% #21 1,798 0 1 2006 33–20 62.3% #12 1,842 0 1
22 2006 52–18 74.3% #9 1,954 0 3 2007 44–22 66.7% #16 1,937 0 2
23 2007 13–10 56.5% #83 1,880 0 3 2008 12–12 50.0% #98 1,815 0 2
24 2008 29–17 63.0% #36 1,903 0 3 2009 18–16 52.9% #42 1,810 0 3
25 2009 12–7 63.2% #95 1,905 0 3 2010 41–27 60.3% #20 1,852 0 4
26 2010 2–3 40.0% #478 1,866 0 3 2011 26–27 49.1% #44 1,844 0 4
27 2012 31–24 56.4% #36 1,897 0 4
28 2013 14–22 38.9% #87 1,804 0 4
29 2014 7–11 38.9% #85 1,703 0 4
30 2015 26–19 57.8% #46 1,869 0 4
31 2016 26–23 53.1% #36 1,884 0 4
32 2017 18–16 52.9% #102 1,839 0 4
33 2018 12–17 41.4% #124 1,723 0 4
34 2019 4–3 57.1% #179 1,740 0 4