H2H data updated: 2026-09-02 00:00 UTC

Mario Ancic vs Marcos Baghdatis H2H: 4-1

Mario Ancic holds a 4–1 lead over Marcos Baghdatis in their ATP head-to-head. Across 5 main-draw meetings, Mario Ancic leads 3–1 on hard courts and 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Mario Ancic won the 2008 Marseille semifinal 6-4 6-2.

CRO Age 42 Right-Handed 196 cm / 6'5"
H2H
4 1
5 main draw meetings
CYP Age 41 Right-Handed 183 cm / 6'0"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Mario Ancic #135 6-4 6-2 Marcos Baghdatis #17 Match data Feb 16, 2008* SF Marseille International Series modern equivalent ATP 250 Hard
Marcos Baghdatis #9 6-4 6-0 Mario Ancic #12 Match data Sep 17, 2006* F China Open ATP International Series modern equivalent ATP 250 Hard
Mario Ancic #12 7-6(4) 6-3 Marcos Baghdatis #17 Match data Jun 24, 2006* SF Libéma Open ATP International Series modern equivalent ATP 250 Grass
Mario Ancic #21 6-2 6-7(9) 6-4 Marcos Baghdatis #27 Match data Feb 16, 2006* R32 Marseille ATP International Series modern equivalent ATP 250 Hard
Mario Ancic #24 6-1 7-6(4) Marcos Baghdatis #81 Match data Oct 8, 2005* QF Japan Open ATP International Series Gold modern equivalent ATP 500 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Mario Ancic #475 #7 2,075 2,019 193 125 60.7% 0 0 0 0 3 3
Marcos Baghdatis #179 #8 2,111 1,952 327 274 54.4% 0 0 0 0 4 4

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Mario Ancic Marcos Baghdatis
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
18 2002 3–7 30.0% #89 1,530 0 0
19 2003 14–18 43.8% #74 1,621 0 0 2004 2–2 50.0% #159 1,576 0 0
20 2004 26–22 54.2% #29 1,725 0 0 2005 11–12 47.8% #55 1,699 0 0
21 2005 42–23 64.6% #21 1,799 0 1 2006 33–20 62.3% #12 1,842 0 1
22 2006 52–18 74.3% #9 1,954 0 3 2007 44–22 66.7% #16 1,938 0 2
23 2007 13–10 56.5% #83 1,881 0 3 2008 12–12 50.0% #98 1,814 0 2
24 2008 29–17 63.0% #36 1,925 0 3 2009 18–16 52.9% #42 1,784 0 3
25 2009 12–7 63.2% #95 1,917 0 3 2010 41–27 60.3% #20 1,851 0 4
26 2010 2–3 40.0% #478 1,876 0 3 2011 26–27 49.1% #44 1,844 0 4
27 2012 33–25 56.9% #36 1,908 0 4
28 2013 14–22 38.9% #87 1,806 0 4
29 2014 7–11 38.9% #85 1,704 0 4
30 2015 26–19 57.8% #46 1,870 0 4
31 2016 26–23 53.1% #36 1,884 0 4
32 2017 18–16 52.9% #102 1,839 0 4
33 2018 12–17 41.4% #124 1,728 0 4
34 2019 4–3 57.1% #179 1,743 0 4

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Mario Ancic Marcos Baghdatis
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
18 2002 2 5 7 28.6% 1 2 3 33.3%
19 2003 9 13 22 40.9% 3 2 5 60.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 2004 2 2 4 50.0%
20 2004 6 10 16 37.5% 6 5 11 54.5% 10 3 13 76.9% 4 4 8 50.0% 2005 7 7 14 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 4 1 5 80.0%
21 2005 24 13 37 64.9% 6 5 11 54.5% 9 2 11 81.8% 3 3 6 50.0% 2006 22 12 34 64.7% 3 4 7 42.9% 8 3 11 72.7% 0 1 1 0.0%
22 2006 24 11 35 68.6% 11 4 15 73.3% 9 1 10 90.0% 8 2 10 80.0% 2007 23 15 38 60.5% 8 5 13 61.5% 8 2 10 80.0% 5 0 5 100.0%
23 2007 12 9 21 57.1% 1 1 2 50.0% 2008 7 9 16 43.8% 0 1 1 0.0% 5 2 7 71.4%
24 2008 15 9 24 62.5% 6 5 11 54.5% 8 3 11 72.7% 2009 16 12 28 57.1% 0 2 2 0.0% 2 2 4 50.0%
25 2009 12 6 18 66.7% 0 1 1 0.0% 2010 33 18 51 64.7% 8 6 14 57.1% 0 3 3 0.0%
26 2010 2 2 4 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 2011 18 18 36 50.0% 3 7 10 30.0% 5 2 7 71.4%
27 2012 24 16 40 60.0% 3 5 8 37.5% 6 4 10 60.0%
28 2013 14 15 29 48.3% 0 4 4 0.0% 0 3 3 0.0%
29 2014 5 8 13 38.5% 0 1 1 0.0% 2 2 4 50.0%
30 2015 17 13 30 56.7% 2 3 5 40.0% 7 3 10 70.0%
31 2016 17 14 31 54.8% 3 4 7 42.9% 6 5 11 54.5%
32 2017 14 10 24 58.3% 0 3 3 0.0% 4 3 7 57.1%
33 2018 11 11 22 50.0% 0 3 3 0.0% 1 3 4 25.0%
34 2019 3 2 5 60.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
Career 106 78 184 57.6% 32 23 55 58.2% 39 14 53 73.6% 16 10 26 61.5% 233 182 415 56.1% 30 50 80 37.5% 55 40 95 57.9% 9 2 11 81.8%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 314/318 of Mario Ancic's and 594/601 of Marcos Baghdatis's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Mario Ancic Marcos Baghdatis
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
18 2002 8/10 7.0 6.0 49.1% 75.0% 44.7% 54.2% 29.0% 59.8% 38.4% —/—
19 2003 32/32 8.4 4.3 57.9% 72.2% 51.0% 55.3% 38.5% 63.0% 37.1% 2004 2/4 11.5 7.5 51.4% 71.0% 41.1% 18.3% 61.4% 56.3% 38.1%
20 2004 47/48 9.5 3.2 62.3% 75.9% 55.0% 45.1% 40.3% 67.8% 37.9% 2005 23/23 7.5 2.6 56.7% 73.2% 52.6% 55.8% 51.8% 64.3% 37.5%
21 2005 65/65 11.3 2.8 61.8% 79.5% 52.0% 62.9% 46.7% 68.9% 37.4% 2006 53/53 7.4 3.3 52.5% 74.5% 50.5% 54.0% 44.4% 62.8% 40.2%
22 2006 70/70 9.1 2.0 62.7% 75.5% 53.5% 64.7% 44.0% 67.2% 37.3% 2007 66/66 6.8 2.7 52.6% 75.1% 54.2% 61.3% 46.5% 65.0% 39.2%
23 2007 23/23 8.3 1.7 63.5% 76.8% 53.0% 56.1% 42.7% 68.0% 35.4% 2008 24/24 8.2 3.8 54.0% 77.5% 53.3% 57.0% 35.8% 66.3% 35.2%
24 2008 45/46 9.2 2.3 62.9% 76.3% 53.6% 64.5% 39.8% 67.7% 37.1% 2009 33/34 7.2 3.0 52.8% 75.2% 51.2% 56.2% 43.9% 63.7% 39.4%
25 2009 19/19 7.6 1.3 60.0% 73.0% 57.8% 59.9% 30.8% 66.6% 37.2% 2010 68/68 7.3 2.9 51.3% 75.9% 52.1% 57.6% 43.5% 64.5% 38.6%
26 2010 5/5 8.0 2.6 59.8% 69.0% 42.0% 50.6% 42.4% 58.0% 31.3% 2011 53/53 7.5 2.9 51.3% 76.4% 51.0% 59.2% 46.0% 63.9% 36.7%
27 —/— 2012 55/58 6.3 3.1 54.7% 73.6% 52.4% 54.6% 43.1% 64.2% 37.9%
28 —/— 2013 36/36 7.6 4.3 53.0% 75.3% 51.9% 64.0% 39.1% 64.1% 34.4%
29 —/— 2014 18/18 6.4 4.6 52.0% 74.5% 50.3% 45.3% 45.3% 63.0% 35.2%
30 —/— 2015 45/45 7.8 3.6 54.5% 74.1% 51.1% 58.0% 45.4% 63.6% 37.6%
31 —/— 2016 49/49 6.0 3.3 52.3% 73.9% 53.6% 58.4% 43.5% 64.0% 36.9%
32 —/— 2017 34/34 7.6 3.5 52.0% 76.6% 49.9% 62.7% 39.9% 64.1% 36.3%
33 —/— 2018 28/29 9.6 3.5 56.0% 74.9% 50.9% 56.9% 37.7% 64.0% 38.1%
34 —/— 2019 7/7 5.7 4.1 55.2% 77.5% 46.0% 56.1% 43.2% 63.4% 37.0%
Career 314/318 9.3 2.7 61.5% 76.0% 53.0% 59.0% 41.5% 67.0% 37.2% 594/601 7.3 3.3 53.0% 75.0% 51.8% 57.6% 43.6% 64.1% 37.7%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Mario Ancic Marcos Baghdatis
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
18 2002 1531 113.3 -1.58 +0.50 0.955 48.9% -13 +101 37.5% -0.50 2–2 (50%) 2–2 (50%) +0.28 2003 1485 100.2
19 2003 1622 126.7 +0.21 +0.64 1.003 50.1% -36 -40 -47 46.1% -0.20 6–9 (40%) 8–12 (40%) -0.08 2004 1576 118.7 -0.69 +1.61 0.871 47.4% +16 50.0% -0.50 1–1 2–0 -0.09
20 2004 1725 141.5 +4.07 +1.16 1.178 52.4% -136 -28 +99 54.0% +0.48 6–9 (40%) 7–17 (29%) -1.51 2005 1700 138.3 +1.75 +0.83 1.048 50.7% +36 49.3% +0.13 4–5 (44%) 8–8 (50%) -0.74
21 2005 1799 152.9 +5.24 +0.79 1.202 53.0% -15 -42 +132 64.8% +1.01 5–11 (31%) 18–11 (62%) +2.76 2006 1843 151.4 +0.96 +3.30 1.081 51.5% +9 -291 -70 59.3% +0.45 11–9 (55%) 17–7 (71%) -1.44
22 2006 1954 149.4 +4.79 +0.38 1.138 52.3% -48 -50 +88 64.1% +0.94 21–2 (91%) 19–14 (58%) +1.74 2007 1938 150.2 +2.29 +2.86 1.121 52.1% -36 -250 -59 61.7% +0.72 13–6 (68%) 18–16 (53%) -0.34
23 2007 1882 144.6 +3.39 -0.07 1.107 51.5% -14 60.0% +0.82 2–3 (40%) 2–4 (33%) +0.28 2008 1814 141.8 +1.75 -0.01 1.045 50.5% +1 +137 56.3% +0.06 2–5 (29%) 7–3 (70%) -0.74
24 2008 1925 152.1 +4.71 +1.41 1.150 52.1% -36 -23 +173 58.0% +0.59 9–4 (69%) 11–11 (50%) -4.16 2009 1785 147.9 +0.73 +2.59 1.086 51.4% +42 +151 56.4% +0.42 1–6 (14%) 5–7 (42%) -0.90
25 2009 1918 145.3 +2.66 +1.24 1.114 51.2% +12 55.3% +0.45 6–0 (100%) 4–4 (50%) -0.19 2010 1852 156.2 +1.70 +2.21 1.087 51.3% +40 -122 -46 59.2% +0.51 12–11 (52%) 16–8 (67%) -0.06
26 2010 1877 117.6 -1.67 -1.63 0.746 45.6% +37 33.3% -0.83 2–0 1–1 -0.31 2011 1844 157.1 +1.07 +0.51 1.016 50.4% +32 -159 +46 52.2% +0.26 8–11 (42%) 13–14 (48%) -0.79
27 2012 1908 155.9 +1.50 +1.16 1.059 50.9% +21 -225 +14 56.4% +0.32 9–6 (60%) 13–10 (57%) -1.33
28 2013 1806 154.0 +1.07 -0.98 0.959 49.3% +63 -182 +5 43.6% -0.19 3–9 (25%) 6–13 (32%) -2.69
29 2014 1705 123.0 -0.60 -0.13 0.951 48.8% +34 +84 46.8% -0.34 4–6 (40%) 5–3 (63%) +0.23
30 2015 1870 152.8 -0.76 +2.30 1.033 50.6% -3 -251 -6 56.9% +0.42 10–7 (59%) 11–9 (55%) -0.74
31 2016 1884 158.0 +0.22 +1.50 1.027 50.2% +24 -227 -33 52.5% +0.08 6–7 (46%) 12–10 (55%) -2.18
32 2017 1839 144.1 +0.48 -0.05 1.011 50.1% +31 -215 -34 52.1% +0.15 6–1 (86%) 6–6 (50%) -0.55
33 2018 1728 136.9 +0.05 +0.78 1.058 50.5% +55 -175 +46 43.8% -0.13 3–4 (43%) 7–8 (47%) +0.39
34 2019 1743 122.7 -0.99 +0.40 1.010 49.8% +39 50.0% -0.11 2–0 1–3 (25%) +0.56
Career 2019 150.9 +3.80 +0.75 1.125 51.9% -37 -37 +105 57.8% +0.60 59–40 (60%) 72–76 (49%) 106.1 -0.38 1953 157.5 +0.97 +1.47 1.049 50.7% +23 -204 +4 54.6% +0.27 95–94 (50%) 147–125 (54%) 100.7 -1.90

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.