H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 07:16 UTC
Mario Ancic vs Mardy Fish H2H: 0-3
Mardy Fish holds a 3–0 lead over Mario Ancic in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Mardy Fish leads 3–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Mardy Fish won the 2007 Auckland fourth round 6-4 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
CRO
Age 42
Right-Handed
196 cm / 6'5"
H2H
0
–
3
3 main draw meetings
USA
Age 44
Right-Handed
188 cm / 6'2"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 12, 2007* | Auckland | ATP 250 | R16 | Hard | Mardy Fish | 6-4 6-4 | Mario Ancic | Match data |
| Oct 20, 2004* | Madrid Masters | Masters 1000 | R64 | Hard | Mardy Fish | 0-6 6-4 6-4 | Mario Ancic | Match data |
| Oct 25, 2003* | Stockholm | ATP 250 | QF | Hard | Mardy Fish | 6-4 6-7(7) 7-6(4) | Mario Ancic | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mario Ancic | #475 | #7 | 2,075 | 2,019 | 193 | 124 | 60.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
| Mardy Fish | #619 | #7 | 3,060 | 2,114 | 290 | 211 | 57.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 6 | 6 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Mario Ancic | Mardy Fish | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | 2002 | 3–7 | 30.0% | #89 | 1,531 | 0 | 0 | 2000 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #305 | 1,524 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 2003 | 14–18 | 43.8% | #74 | 1,621 | 0 | 0 | 2001 | 5–8 | 38.5% | #141 | 1,542 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2004 | 26–21 | 55.3% | #29 | 1,732 | 0 | 0 | 2002 | 11–11 | 50.0% | #84 | 1,630 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2005 | 42–23 | 64.6% | #21 | 1,798 | 0 | 1 | 2003 | 38–23 | 62.3% | #20 | 1,841 | 0 | 1 |
| 22 | 2006 | 52–18 | 74.3% | #9 | 1,954 | 0 | 3 | 2004 | 21–17 | 55.3% | #37 | 1,728 | 0 | 1 |
| 23 | 2007 | 13–10 | 56.5% | #83 | 1,880 | 0 | 3 | 2005 | 6–11 | 35.3% | #225 | 1,625 | 0 | 1 |
| 24 | 2008 | 29–17 | 63.0% | #36 | 1,903 | 0 | 3 | 2006 | 23–18 | 56.1% | #47 | 1,729 | 0 | 2 |
| 25 | 2009 | 12–7 | 63.2% | #95 | 1,905 | 0 | 3 | 2007 | 24–21 | 53.3% | #39 | 1,756 | 0 | 2 |
| 26 | 2010 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #478 | 1,866 | 0 | 3 | 2008 | 32–23 | 58.2% | #24 | 1,854 | 0 | 2 |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2009 | 21–17 | 55.3% | #55 | 1,789 | 0 | 3 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2010 | 38–15 | 71.7% | #16 | 2,009 | 0 | 5 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2011 | 42–22 | 65.6% | #8 | 2,012 | 0 | 6 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2012 | 20–12 | 62.5% | #27 | 2,008 | 0 | 6 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2013 | 4–5 | 44.4% | #373 | 1,932 | 0 | 6 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2015 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #423 | 1,882 | 0 | 6 |