H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Mario Ancic vs Mariano Zabaleta H2H: 1-0
Mario Ancic holds a 1–0 lead over Mariano Zabaleta in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Mario Ancic leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Mario Ancic won the 2004 Roland Garros second round 6-3 6-4 3-6 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
CRO
Age 42
Right-Handed
196 cm / 6'5"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
ARG
Age 48
Right-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 28, 2004* | Roland Garros | Grand Slam | R64 | Clay | Mario Ancic | 6-3 6-4 3-6 6-4 | Mariano Zabaleta | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mario Ancic | #475 | #7 | 2,075 | 2,019 | 193 | 124 | 60.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
| Mariano Zabaleta | #1,009 | #21 | 1,426 | 1,878 | 199 | 206 | 49.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Mario Ancic | Mariano Zabaleta | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1995 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #381 | 1,514 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 2002 | 3–7 | 30.0% | #89 | 1,531 | 0 | 0 | 1996 | 9–8 | 52.9% | #103 | 1,598 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 2003 | 14–18 | 43.8% | #74 | 1,621 | 0 | 0 | 1997 | 0–6 | 0.0% | #257 | 1,531 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2004 | 26–21 | 55.3% | #29 | 1,732 | 0 | 0 | 1998 | 14–8 | 63.6% | #63 | 1,692 | 0 | 1 |
| 21 | 2005 | 42–23 | 64.6% | #21 | 1,798 | 0 | 1 | 1999 | 28–29 | 49.1% | #28 | 1,686 | 0 | 1 |
| 22 | 2006 | 52–18 | 74.3% | #9 | 1,954 | 0 | 3 | 2000 | 17–26 | 39.5% | #61 | 1,635 | 0 | 1 |
| 23 | 2007 | 13–10 | 56.5% | #83 | 1,880 | 0 | 3 | 2001 | 18–18 | 50.0% | #59 | 1,723 | 0 | 1 |
| 24 | 2008 | 29–17 | 63.0% | #36 | 1,903 | 0 | 3 | 2002 | 20–28 | 41.7% | #53 | 1,629 | 0 | 1 |
| 25 | 2009 | 12–7 | 63.2% | #95 | 1,905 | 0 | 3 | 2003 | 33–24 | 57.9% | #27 | 1,763 | 0 | 2 |
| 26 | 2010 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #478 | 1,866 | 0 | 3 | 2004 | 25–20 | 55.6% | #54 | 1,708 | 0 | 3 |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2005 | 20–16 | 55.6% | #83 | 1,726 | 0 | 3 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2006 | 4–8 | 33.3% | #243 | 1,596 | 0 | 3 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2007 | 9–11 | 45.0% | #104 | 1,602 | 0 | 3 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2008 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #1141 | 1,556 | 0 | 3 |