H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 07:16 UTC
Mario Ancic vs Mark Philippoussis H2H: 1-2
Mark Philippoussis holds a 2–1 lead over Mario Ancic in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Mark Philippoussis leads 2–1 on hard courts. Most recently, Mario Ancic won the 2005 Scottsdale fourth round 6-1 7-6(3).
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
CRO
Age 42
Right-Handed
196 cm / 6'5"
H2H
1
–
2
3 main draw meetings
AUS
Age 49
Right-Handed
196 cm / 6'5"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 25, 2005* | Scottsdale | ATP 250 | R16 | Hard | Mario Ancic | 6-1 7-6(3) | Mark Philippoussis | Match data |
| Jan 25, 2004* | Australian Open | Grand Slam | R32 | Hard | Mark Philippoussis | 6-4 7-6(2) 6-2 | Mario Ancic | Match data |
| Oct 3, 2003* | Tokyo | ATP 250 | R16 | Hard | Mark Philippoussis | 6-4 7-5 | Mario Ancic | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mario Ancic | #475 | #7 | 2,075 | 2,019 | 193 | 124 | 60.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
| Mark Philippoussis | #1,115 | #8 | 2,296 | 2,022 | 287 | 190 | 60.2% | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 10 | 11 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Mario Ancic | Mark Philippoussis | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1994 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #274 | 1,492 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 2002 | 3–7 | 30.0% | #89 | 1,531 | 0 | 0 | 1995 | 25–17 | 59.5% | #38 | 1,764 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 2003 | 14–18 | 43.8% | #74 | 1,621 | 0 | 0 | 1996 | 31–22 | 58.5% | #30 | 1,838 | 0 | 1 |
| 20 | 2004 | 26–21 | 55.3% | #29 | 1,732 | 0 | 0 | 1997 | 43–18 | 70.5% | #18 | 1,852 | 0 | 4 |
| 21 | 2005 | 42–23 | 64.6% | #21 | 1,798 | 0 | 1 | 1998 | 31–19 | 62.0% | #15 | 1,906 | 0 | 5 |
| 22 | 2006 | 52–18 | 74.3% | #9 | 1,954 | 0 | 3 | 1999 | 30–15 | 66.7% | #19 | 1,892 | 0 | 7 |
| 23 | 2007 | 13–10 | 56.5% | #83 | 1,880 | 0 | 3 | 2000 | 40–21 | 65.6% | #11 | 1,894 | 0 | 8 |
| 24 | 2008 | 29–17 | 63.0% | #36 | 1,903 | 0 | 3 | 2001 | 10–8 | 55.6% | #104 | 1,803 | 0 | 9 |
| 25 | 2009 | 12–7 | 63.2% | #95 | 1,905 | 0 | 3 | 2002 | 14–14 | 50.0% | #80 | 1,772 | 0 | 9 |
| 26 | 2010 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #478 | 1,866 | 0 | 3 | 2003 | 34–18 | 65.4% | #9 | 1,881 | 0 | 10 |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2004 | 8–15 | 34.8% | #109 | 1,669 | 0 | 10 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2005 | 9–11 | 45.0% | #171 | 1,659 | 0 | 10 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2006 | 11–9 | 55.0% | #114 | 1,732 | 0 | 11 |