H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Mario Ancic vs Max Mirnyi H2H: 1-2
Max Mirnyi holds a 2–1 lead over Mario Ancic in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on carpet, while Max Mirnyi leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Mario Ancic won the 2006 St. Petersburg quarterfinal 6-4 7-5.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
CRO
Age 42
Right-Handed
196 cm / 6'5"
H2H
1
–
2
3 main draw meetings
BLR
Age 49
Right-Handed
196 cm / 6'5"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 28, 2006* | St. Petersburg | ATP 250 | QF | Carpet | Mario Ancic | 6-4 7-5 | Max Mirnyi | Match data |
| Oct 7, 2004* | Lyon | ATP 250 | R32 | Carpet | Max Mirnyi | 6-3 3-1 (ret.) | Mario Ancic | Match data |
| Feb 20, 2003* | Rotterdam | ATP 250 | R32 | Hard | Max Mirnyi | 6-7(5) 7-6(5) 6-4 | Mario Ancic | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mario Ancic | #475 | #7 | 2,075 | 2,019 | 193 | 124 | 60.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
| Max Mirnyi | #1,155 | #18 | 1,320 | 1,913 | 216 | 222 | 49.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Mario Ancic | Max Mirnyi | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | 2002 | 3–7 | 30.0% | #89 | 1,531 | 0 | 0 | 1996 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #314 | 1,481 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 2003 | 14–18 | 43.8% | #74 | 1,621 | 0 | 0 | 1997 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #340 | 1,443 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2004 | 26–21 | 55.3% | #29 | 1,732 | 0 | 0 | 1998 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #274 | 1,443 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2005 | 42–23 | 64.6% | #21 | 1,798 | 0 | 1 | 1999 | 14–13 | 51.9% | #74 | 1,613 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2006 | 52–18 | 74.3% | #9 | 1,954 | 0 | 3 | 2000 | 27–25 | 51.9% | #40 | 1,716 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2007 | 13–10 | 56.5% | #83 | 1,880 | 0 | 3 | 2001 | 29–26 | 52.7% | #35 | 1,865 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2008 | 29–17 | 63.0% | #36 | 1,903 | 0 | 3 | 2002 | 24–27 | 47.1% | #43 | 1,717 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2009 | 12–7 | 63.2% | #95 | 1,905 | 0 | 3 | 2003 | 37–28 | 56.9% | #23 | 1,785 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | 2010 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #478 | 1,866 | 0 | 3 | 2004 | 20–25 | 44.4% | #47 | 1,719 | 0 | 1 |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2005 | 32–24 | 57.1% | #34 | 1,735 | 0 | 1 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2006 | 21–24 | 46.7% | #59 | 1,723 | 0 | 1 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2007 | 9–18 | 33.3% | #152 | 1,593 | 0 | 1 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2008 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #523 | 1,563 | 0 | 1 |