H2H data updated: 2026-09-01 00:00 UTC

Mario Ancic vs Nathan Healey H2H: 1-0

Mario Ancic holds a 1–0 lead over Nathan Healey in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Mario Ancic leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Mario Ancic won the 2006 Roland Garros round of 128 6-3 4-6 7-6(3) 6-1.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Mario Ancic
CRO Age 42 Right-Handed 196 cm / 6'5"
H2H
1 – 0
1 main draw meetings
Nathan Healey
AUS Age 46 Right-Handed 180 cm / 5'11"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Mario Ancic #12 6-3 4-6 7-6(3) 6-1 Nathan Healey #195 Match data May 31, 2006* R128 Roland Garros Grand Slam Clay

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Mario Ancic #475 #7 2,075 2,019 193 125 60.7% 0 0 0 0 3 3
Nathan Healey #1,134 #159 268 1,579 6 13 31.6% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Mario Ancic Nathan Healey
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
18 2002 3–7 30.0% #89 1,530 0 0 — — — — — — —
19 2003 14–18 43.8% #74 1,621 0 0 — — — — — — —
20 2004 26–22 54.2% #29 1,725 0 0 — — — — — — —
21 2005 42–23 64.6% #21 1,799 0 1 — — — — — — —
22 2006 52–18 74.3% #9 1,954 0 3 — — — — — — —
23 2007 13–10 56.5% #83 1,881 0 3 — — — — — — —
24 2008 29–17 63.0% #36 1,925 0 3 2004 0–2 0.0% #344 1,467 0 0
25 2009 12–7 63.2% #95 1,917 0 3 2005 2–3 40.0% #241 1,488 0 0
26 2010 2–3 40.0% #478 1,876 0 3 2006 2–4 33.3% #162 1,506 0 0
27 — — — — — — — 2007 2–4 33.3% #259 1,514 0 0

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Mario Ancic Nathan Healey
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
18 2002 2 5 7 28.6% — — — — 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 2003 9 13 22 40.9% 3 2 5 60.0% 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 2004 6 10 16 37.5% 6 5 11 54.5% 10 3 13 76.9% 4 4 8 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
21 2005 24 13 37 64.9% 6 5 11 54.5% 9 2 11 81.8% 3 3 6 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
22 2006 24 11 35 68.6% 11 4 15 73.3% 9 1 10 90.0% 8 2 10 80.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
23 2007 12 9 21 57.1% — — — — — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
24 2008 15 9 24 62.5% 6 5 11 54.5% 8 3 11 72.7% — — — — 2004 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
25 2009 12 6 18 66.7% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 2005 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
26 2010 2 2 4 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 2006 2 3 5 40.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
27 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2007 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
Career — 106 78 184 57.6% 32 23 55 58.2% 39 14 53 73.6% 16 10 26 61.5% — 5 11 16 31.2% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 314/318 of Mario Ancic's and 19/19 of Nathan Healey's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Mario Ancic Nathan Healey
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
18 2002 8/10 7.0 6.0 49.1% 75.0% 44.7% 54.2% 29.0% 59.8% 38.4% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
19 2003 32/32 8.4 4.3 57.9% 72.2% 51.0% 55.3% 38.5% 63.0% 37.1% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
20 2004 47/48 9.5 3.2 62.3% 75.9% 55.0% 45.1% 40.3% 67.8% 37.9% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
21 2005 65/65 11.3 2.8 61.8% 79.5% 52.0% 62.9% 46.7% 68.9% 37.4% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
22 2006 70/70 9.1 2.0 62.7% 75.5% 53.5% 64.7% 44.0% 67.2% 37.3% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
23 2007 23/23 8.3 1.7 63.5% 76.8% 53.0% 56.1% 42.7% 68.0% 35.4% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
24 2008 45/46 9.2 2.3 62.9% 76.3% 53.6% 64.5% 39.8% 67.7% 37.1% 2004 2/2 12.5 8.0 46.0% 79.2% 52.6% 47.2% 68.8% 64.4% 29.4%
25 2009 19/19 7.6 1.3 60.0% 73.0% 57.8% 59.9% 30.8% 66.6% 37.2% 2005 5/5 10.8 4.6 58.0% 76.2% 46.1% 60.3% 60.8% 63.9% 36.9%
26 2010 5/5 8.0 2.6 59.8% 69.0% 42.0% 50.6% 42.4% 58.0% 31.3% 2006 6/6 7.2 5.8 59.4% 70.1% 52.2% 62.5% 31.8% 62.6% 31.5%
27 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2007 6/6 5.7 6.2 53.7% 73.7% 50.1% 61.7% 27.1% 63.0% 34.5%
Career — 314/318 9.3 2.7 61.5% 76.0% 53.0% 59.0% 41.5% 67.0% 37.2% — 19/19 8.2 5.8 55.8% 73.8% 50.0% 60.1% 41.8% 63.3% 33.7%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Mario Ancic Nathan Healey
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
18 2002 1531 113.3 -1.58 +0.50 0.955 48.9% -13 — +101 37.5% -0.50 2–2 (50%) 2–2 (50%) — +0.28 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 2003 1622 126.7 +0.21 +0.64 1.003 50.1% -36 -40 -47 46.1% -0.20 6–9 (40%) 8–12 (40%) — -0.08 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 2004 1725 141.5 +4.07 +1.16 1.178 52.4% -136 -28 +99 54.0% +0.48 6–9 (40%) 7–17 (29%) — -1.51 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
21 2005 1799 152.9 +5.24 +0.79 1.202 53.0% -15 -42 +132 64.8% +1.01 5–11 (31%) 18–11 (62%) — +2.76 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
22 2006 1954 149.4 +4.79 +0.38 1.138 52.3% -48 -50 +88 64.1% +0.94 21–2 (91%) 19–14 (58%) — +1.74 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
23 2007 1882 144.6 +3.39 -0.07 1.107 51.5% -14 — — 60.0% +0.82 2–3 (40%) 2–4 (33%) — +0.28 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
24 2008 1925 152.1 +4.71 +1.41 1.150 52.1% -36 -23 +173 58.0% +0.59 9–4 (69%) 11–11 (50%) — -4.16 2004 1467 100.2 -0.87 -3.23 0.828 48.6% — — — 33.3% -0.83 0–2 0–1 — +0.44
25 2009 1918 145.3 +2.66 +1.24 1.114 51.2% +12 — — 55.3% +0.45 6–0 (100%) 4–4 (50%) — -0.19 2005 1489 112.3 -0.58 -0.57 1.023 50.1% +13 — — 22.2% -0.89 — 0–2 — -0.16
26 2010 1877 117.6 -1.67 -1.63 0.746 45.6% +37 — — 33.3% -0.83 2–0 1–1 — -0.31 2006 1507 102.1 +1.28 -2.02 0.843 47.5% -4 — — 31.3% -1.38 — 0–3 (0%) — +0.45
27 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2007 1514 113.5 -0.22 -1.43 0.935 49.3% +8 — — 41.7% -0.08 0–1 0–1 — -0.14
28 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2008 1513 105.1 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 2019 150.9 +3.80 +0.75 1.125 51.9% -37 -37 +105 57.8% +0.60 59–40 (60%) 72–76 (49%) 106.1 -0.38 — 1579 112.0 +0.09 -1.58 0.917 48.9% +6 — — 32.6% -0.84 0–3 (0%) 0–7 (0%) 90.2 +3.11

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.