H2H data updated: 2026-09-03 00:00 UTC

Mario Ancic vs Nicolas Almagro H2H: 1-1

Mario Ancic and Nicolas Almagro are tied 1–1 in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Nicolas Almagro leads 1–0 on clay, while Mario Ancic leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Nicolas Almagro won the 2008 Barcelona Open third round 7-6(5) 6-2.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Mario Ancic
CRO Age 42 Right-Handed 196 cm / 6'5"
H2H
1 – 1
2 main draw meetings
Nicolas Almagro
ESP Age 41 Right-Handed 183 cm / 6'0"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Nicolas Almagro #22 7-6(5) 6-2 Mario Ancic #51 Match data May 2, 2008* R16 Barcelona Open International Series Gold → modern equivalent ATP 500 Clay
Mario Ancic #10 7-6(2) 7-5 7-6(4) Nicolas Almagro #47 Match data Jun 28, 2006* R128 Wimbledon Grand Slam Grass

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Mario Ancic #475 #7 2,075 2,019 193 125 60.7% 0 0 0 0 3 3
Nicolas Almagro #846 #9 2,735 2,079 388 274 58.6% 0 0 0 2 11 13

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Mario Ancic Nicolas Almagro
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
17 — — — — — — — 2003 1–1 50.0% #156 1,511 0 0
18 2002 3–7 30.0% #89 1,530 0 0 2004 2–7 22.2% #103 1,539 0 0
19 2003 14–18 43.8% #74 1,621 0 0 2005 13–22 37.1% #114 1,551 0 0
20 2004 26–22 54.2% #29 1,725 0 0 2006 27–20 57.4% #32 1,721 0 1
21 2005 42–23 64.6% #21 1,799 0 1 2007 32–27 54.2% #28 1,723 0 2
22 2006 52–18 74.3% #9 1,954 0 3 2008 34–17 66.7% #18 1,771 0 4
23 2007 13–10 56.5% #83 1,881 0 3 2009 30–24 55.6% #26 1,829 0 5
24 2008 29–17 63.0% #36 1,925 0 3 2010 41–23 64.1% #15 1,884 0 7
25 2009 12–7 63.2% #95 1,917 0 3 2011 47–23 67.1% #10 1,876 0 10
26 2010 2–3 40.0% #478 1,876 0 3 2012 54–22 71.1% #11 2,013 0 12
27 — — — — — — — 2013 42–23 64.6% #13 1,962 0 12
28 — — — — — — — 2014 15–10 60.0% #71 1,924 0 12
29 — — — — — — — 2015 18–20 47.4% #73 1,795 0 12
30 — — — — — — — 2016 22–22 50.0% #44 1,792 0 13
31 — — — — — — — 2017 10–12 45.5% #151 1,835 0 13
32 — — — — — — — 2018 0–1 0.0% #846 1,780 0 13

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Mario Ancic Nicolas Almagro
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2003 — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — —
18 2002 2 5 7 28.6% — — — — 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 2004 — — — — 2 7 9 22.2% — — — — — — — —
19 2003 9 13 22 40.9% 3 2 5 60.0% 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — 2005 1 4 5 20.0% 12 17 29 41.4% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
20 2004 6 10 16 37.5% 6 5 11 54.5% 10 3 13 76.9% 4 4 8 50.0% 2006 1 6 7 14.3% 23 10 33 69.7% 0 2 2 0.0% 3 2 5 60.0%
21 2005 24 13 37 64.9% 6 5 11 54.5% 9 2 11 81.8% 3 3 6 50.0% 2007 9 12 21 42.9% 23 13 36 63.9% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
22 2006 24 11 35 68.6% 11 4 15 73.3% 9 1 10 90.0% 8 2 10 80.0% 2008 4 8 12 33.3% 29 8 37 78.4% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
23 2007 12 9 21 57.1% — — — — — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% 2009 10 11 21 47.6% 18 12 30 60.0% 2 1 3 66.7% — — — —
24 2008 15 9 24 62.5% 6 5 11 54.5% 8 3 11 72.7% — — — — 2010 15 12 27 55.6% 25 9 34 73.5% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — —
25 2009 12 6 18 66.7% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 2011 13 12 25 52.0% 32 9 41 78.0% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — —
26 2010 2 2 4 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 2012 19 11 30 63.3% 30 9 39 76.9% 5 2 7 71.4% — — — —
27 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2013 17 11 28 60.7% 23 11 34 67.6% 2 1 3 66.7% — — — —
28 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2014 1 1 2 50.0% 14 9 23 60.9% — — — — — — — —
29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2015 2 6 8 25.0% 16 12 28 57.1% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — —
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2016 7 11 18 38.9% 14 10 24 58.3% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2017 3 5 8 37.5% 7 7 14 50.0% — — — — — — — —
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2018 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
Career — 106 78 184 57.6% 32 23 55 58.2% 39 14 53 73.6% 16 10 26 61.5% — 102 110 212 48.1% 269 145 414 65.0% 14 16 30 46.7% 3 3 6 50.0%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 314/318 of Mario Ancic's and 651/662 of Nicolas Almagro's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Mario Ancic Nicolas Almagro
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
17 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2003 1/2 0.0 0.0 36.4% 100.0% 57.1% — 33.3% 72.7% 56.3%
18 2002 8/10 7.0 6.0 49.1% 75.0% 44.7% 54.2% 29.0% 59.8% 38.4% 2004 9/9 6.7 4.2 56.5% 69.8% 45.4% 51.5% 37.1% 59.5% 37.8%
19 2003 32/32 8.4 4.3 57.9% 72.2% 51.0% 55.3% 38.5% 63.0% 37.1% 2005 35/35 6.1 2.9 62.4% 69.2% 50.2% 66.5% 46.5% 62.0% 36.6%
20 2004 47/48 9.5 3.2 62.3% 75.9% 55.0% 45.1% 40.3% 67.8% 37.9% 2006 47/47 6.7 2.3 60.8% 73.9% 54.5% 68.1% 42.4% 65.8% 38.7%
21 2005 65/65 11.3 2.8 61.8% 79.5% 52.0% 62.9% 46.7% 68.9% 37.4% 2007 59/59 7.8 2.4 61.1% 74.4% 52.1% 58.9% 43.7% 65.7% 37.7%
22 2006 70/70 9.1 2.0 62.7% 75.5% 53.5% 64.7% 44.0% 67.2% 37.3% 2008 49/51 9.1 2.4 59.0% 75.4% 55.1% 62.6% 43.0% 67.0% 40.0%
23 2007 23/23 8.3 1.7 63.5% 76.8% 53.0% 56.1% 42.7% 68.0% 35.4% 2009 53/54 10.4 2.6 59.1% 75.5% 52.2% 55.1% 42.3% 66.0% 36.3%
24 2008 45/46 9.2 2.3 62.9% 76.3% 53.6% 64.5% 39.8% 67.7% 37.1% 2010 64/64 8.2 1.9 59.7% 75.1% 53.6% 55.5% 40.6% 66.4% 37.2%
25 2009 19/19 7.6 1.3 60.0% 73.0% 57.8% 59.9% 30.8% 66.6% 37.2% 2011 70/70 7.8 2.6 55.9% 76.0% 53.9% 57.1% 40.5% 66.0% 37.5%
26 2010 5/5 8.0 2.6 59.8% 69.0% 42.0% 50.6% 42.4% 58.0% 31.3% 2012 71/76 8.7 1.9 56.8% 77.1% 55.4% 60.5% 38.8% 67.8% 37.8%
27 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2013 65/65 9.6 2.5 57.1% 78.6% 55.4% 58.4% 47.2% 68.7% 39.0%
28 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2014 23/25 7.0 2.0 55.7% 76.6% 55.0% 58.0% 40.7% 66.8% 37.5%
29 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2015 38/38 7.6 3.0 56.6% 74.3% 51.8% 56.1% 29.3% 64.7% 35.5%
30 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2016 44/44 10.0 4.0 54.0% 74.8% 51.9% 53.8% 38.2% 64.3% 36.1%
31 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2017 22/22 7.0 2.3 55.0% 73.1% 48.6% 42.2% 43.1% 61.8% 35.5%
32 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2018 1/1 11.0 2.0 56.8% 85.7% 54.2% 83.3% 0.0% 72.1% 21.4%
Career — 314/318 9.3 2.7 61.5% 76.0% 53.0% 59.0% 41.5% 67.0% 37.2% — 651/662 8.3 2.5 58.0% 75.3% 53.3% 58.3% 41.2% 66.0% 37.5%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Mario Ancic Nicolas Almagro
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2003 1511 102.5 +0.97 -0.39 2.063 63.0% — — — 33.3% -0.33 0–1 0–1 — +0.01
18 2002 1531 113.3 -1.58 +0.50 0.955 48.9% -13 — +101 37.5% -0.50 2–2 (50%) 2–2 (50%) — +0.28 2004 1540 123.5 -0.44 -0.86 0.934 48.1% — +48 — 33.3% -0.96 1–3 (25%) 1–2 (33%) — -0.67
19 2003 1622 126.7 +0.21 +0.64 1.003 50.1% -36 -40 -47 46.1% -0.20 6–9 (40%) 8–12 (40%) — -0.08 2005 1552 131.3 -0.66 -0.28 0.962 49.6% -60 +64 — 42.7% -0.29 3–8 (27%) 5–14 (26%) — +0.44
20 2004 1725 141.5 +4.07 +1.16 1.178 52.4% -136 -28 +99 54.0% +0.48 6–9 (40%) 7–17 (29%) — -1.51 2006 1721 147.3 +3.48 +0.92 1.130 52.0% -200 +123 — 56.6% +0.53 6–8 (43%) 9–12 (43%) — -2.25
21 2005 1799 152.9 +5.24 +0.79 1.202 53.0% -15 -42 +132 64.8% +1.01 5–11 (31%) 18–11 (62%) — +2.76 2007 1724 151.2 +2.51 +0.51 1.100 51.6% -85 +74 — 55.1% +0.46 8–9 (47%) 9–13 (41%) — +1.58
22 2006 1954 149.4 +4.79 +0.38 1.138 52.3% -48 -50 +88 64.1% +0.94 21–2 (91%) 19–14 (58%) — +1.74 2008 1771 147.2 +3.48 +1.81 1.213 53.3% -180 +206 — 66.4% +0.97 6–8 (43%) 10–12 (45%) — +1.82
23 2007 1882 144.6 +3.39 -0.07 1.107 51.5% -14 — — 60.0% +0.82 2–3 (40%) 2–4 (33%) — +0.28 2009 1830 149.5 +2.70 -0.46 1.067 51.0% -100 +75 -243 50.7% +0.31 11–7 (61%) 12–22 (35%) — +0.28
24 2008 1925 152.1 +4.71 +1.41 1.150 52.1% -36 -23 +173 58.0% +0.59 9–4 (69%) 11–11 (50%) — -4.16 2010 1885 153.6 +2.97 +1.08 1.108 51.5% -104 +208 -336 59.1% +0.57 18–9 (67%) 19–15 (56%) — +0.21
25 2009 1918 145.3 +2.66 +1.24 1.114 51.2% +12 — — 55.3% +0.45 6–0 (100%) 4–4 (50%) — -0.19 2011 1877 158.8 +3.24 +0.58 1.103 51.5% -72 +241 -277 63.1% +0.58 11–10 (52%) 26–14 (65%) — +2.38
26 2010 1877 117.6 -1.67 -1.63 0.746 45.6% +37 — — 33.3% -0.83 2–0 1–1 — -0.31 2012 2013 163.5 +4.96 +1.63 1.175 52.2% -64 +142 -248 62.9% +0.81 18–5 (78%) 18–23 (44%) — +1.39
27 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2013 1963 162.6 +5.10 +1.96 1.247 53.4% +6 +111 -176 61.9% +0.92 8–8 (50%) 17–17 (50%) — +3.89
28 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2014 1924 150.9 +2.23 +1.75 1.132 51.4% — +77 — 61.5% +0.54 4–4 (50%) 5–3 (63%) — -0.08
29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2015 1796 152.1 +1.64 -0.54 1.007 50.2% +54 +182 — 45.6% -0.48 5–6 (45%) 10–9 (53%) — -3.74
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2016 1793 148.9 +0.66 -0.29 1.010 49.9% -21 +144 — 50.4% +0.07 9–10 (47%) 10–11 (48%) — +0.05
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2017 1835 150.4 -0.33 -0.08 0.929 49.1% -81 +97 — 51.1% +0.19 3–3 (50%) 6–6 (50%) — -1.98
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2018 1780 96.9 -0.24 -0.55 0.765 47.7% — — — 33.3% -1.00 0–1 1–1 — +0.20
Career — 2019 150.9 +3.80 +0.75 1.125 51.9% -37 -37 +105 57.8% +0.60 59–40 (60%) 72–76 (49%) 106.1 -0.38 — 2079 159.4 +2.82 +0.73 1.102 51.5% -73 +138 -255 56.7% +0.45 111–100 (53%) 158–175 (47%) 96.3 +0.54

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.