Mario Ancic
all rivalries →| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Roger Federer | 1 | 6 | 7 | Jul 3, 2008 | H2H |
| Ivan Ljubicic | 1 | 5 | 6 | Mar 15, 2009 | H2H |
| Nikolay Davydenko | 2 | 4 | 6 | May 8, 2008 | H2H |
| Dominik Hrbaty | 5 | 1 | 6 | Jan 21, 2007 | H2H |
| Rafael Nadal | 1 | 4 | 5 | Mar 16, 2010 | H2H |
H2H data updated: 2026-09-01 00:00 UTC
Mario Ancic vs Nicolas Escude H2H: 0-1
Nicolas Escude holds a 1–0 lead over Mario Ancic in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Nicolas Escude leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Nicolas Escude won the 2003 Marseille round of 16 6-2 3-6 7-6(10).
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
H2H Match Log
| Player | Score | Player | Match Data | Date | Round | Tournament | Category | Surface |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nicolas Escude | 6-2 3-6 7-6(10) | Mario Ancic | Match data | Feb 14, 2003* | R16 | Marseille | ATP International Series → modern equivalent ATP 250 | Hard |
Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories | Finals | 500 including documented historical predecessor categories | 250 including documented historical predecessor categories | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mario Ancic | #475 | #7 | 2,075 | 2,019 | 193 | 125 | 60.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
| Nicolas Escude | #1,071 | #17 | 1,357 | 1,918 | 157 | 125 | 55.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 4 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Mario Ancic | Nicolas Escude | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1993 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #670 | 1,497 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 2002 | 3–7 | 30.0% | #89 | 1,530 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 2003 | 14–18 | 43.8% | #74 | 1,621 | 0 | 0 | 1995 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #189 | 1,504 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2004 | 26–22 | 54.2% | #29 | 1,725 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 2005 | 42–23 | 64.6% | #21 | 1,799 | 0 | 1 | 1997 | 6–6 | 50.0% | #93 | 1,621 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2006 | 52–18 | 74.3% | #9 | 1,954 | 0 | 3 | 1998 | 22–22 | 50.0% | #37 | 1,708 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2007 | 13–10 | 56.5% | #83 | 1,881 | 0 | 3 | 1999 | 19–15 | 55.9% | #37 | 1,821 | 0 | 1 |
| 24 | 2008 | 29–17 | 63.0% | #36 | 1,925 | 0 | 3 | 2000 | 26–23 | 53.1% | #48 | 1,703 | 0 | 1 |
| 25 | 2009 | 12–7 | 63.2% | #95 | 1,917 | 0 | 3 | 2001 | 28–23 | 54.9% | #27 | 1,722 | 0 | 2 |
| 26 | 2010 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #478 | 1,876 | 0 | 3 | 2002 | 29–15 | 65.9% | #34 | 1,846 | 0 | 3 |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2003 | 11–10 | 52.4% | #114 | 1,802 | 0 | 3 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2004 | 15–8 | 65.2% | #64 | 1,834 | 0 | 4 |
Surface Results by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.
| Age | Mario Ancic | Nicolas Escude | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | Carpet | Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | Carpet | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | |||
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1993 | — | — | — | — | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 2002 | 2 | 5 | 7 | 28.6% | — | — | — | — | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 2003 | 9 | 13 | 22 | 40.9% | 3 | 2 | 5 | 60.0% | 2 | 3 | 5 | 40.0% | — | — | — | — | 1995 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% |
| 20 | 2004 | 6 | 10 | 16 | 37.5% | 6 | 5 | 11 | 54.5% | 10 | 3 | 13 | 76.9% | 4 | 4 | 8 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 2005 | 24 | 13 | 37 | 64.9% | 6 | 5 | 11 | 54.5% | 9 | 2 | 11 | 81.8% | 3 | 3 | 6 | 50.0% | 1997 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | 2 | 1 | 3 | 66.7% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | 2 | 2 | 4 | 50.0% |
| 22 | 2006 | 24 | 11 | 35 | 68.6% | 11 | 4 | 15 | 73.3% | 9 | 1 | 10 | 90.0% | 8 | 2 | 10 | 80.0% | 1998 | 13 | 11 | 24 | 54.2% | 5 | 6 | 11 | 45.5% | 2 | 2 | 4 | 50.0% | 2 | 3 | 5 | 40.0% |
| 23 | 2007 | 12 | 9 | 21 | 57.1% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | 1999 | 12 | 9 | 21 | 57.1% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 6 | 4 | 10 | 60.0% |
| 24 | 2008 | 15 | 9 | 24 | 62.5% | 6 | 5 | 11 | 54.5% | 8 | 3 | 11 | 72.7% | — | — | — | — | 2000 | 16 | 11 | 27 | 59.3% | 3 | 6 | 9 | 33.3% | 7 | 3 | 10 | 70.0% | 0 | 3 | 3 | 0.0% |
| 25 | 2009 | 12 | 6 | 18 | 66.7% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2001 | 18 | 12 | 30 | 60.0% | 3 | 5 | 8 | 37.5% | 7 | 3 | 10 | 70.0% | 0 | 3 | 3 | 0.0% |
| 26 | 2010 | 2 | 2 | 4 | 50.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2002 | 15 | 5 | 20 | 75.0% | 0 | 3 | 3 | 0.0% | 3 | 2 | 5 | 60.0% | 11 | 5 | 16 | 68.8% |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2003 | 10 | 5 | 15 | 66.7% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2004 | 10 | 5 | 15 | 66.7% | 4 | 2 | 6 | 66.7% | — | — | — | — | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% |
| Career | — | 106 | 78 | 184 | 57.6% | 32 | 23 | 55 | 58.2% | 39 | 14 | 53 | 73.6% | 16 | 10 | 26 | 61.5% | — | 96 | 61 | 157 | 61.1% | 18 | 27 | 45 | 40.0% | 21 | 14 | 35 | 60.0% | 22 | 23 | 45 | 48.9% |
Performance Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 314/318 of Mario Ancic's and 238/282 of Nicolas Escude's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.
| Age | Mario Ancic | Nicolas Escude | ||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Sample | Aces/M | DFs/M | 1st Sv% | 1st Pts% | 2nd Pts% | BP Saved% | BP Conv% | Svc Pts% | Ret Pts% | Yr | Sample | Aces/M | DFs/M | 1st Sv% | 1st Pts% | 2nd Pts% | BP Saved% | BP Conv% | Svc Pts% | Ret Pts% | |
| 17 | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1993 | 1/1 | 0.0 | 3.0 | 53.8% | 51.4% | 30.0% | 41.7% | 0.0% | 41.5% | 27.1% |
| 18 | 2002 | 8/10 | 7.0 | 6.0 | 49.1% | 75.0% | 44.7% | 54.2% | 29.0% | 59.8% | 38.4% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 2003 | 32/32 | 8.4 | 4.3 | 57.9% | 72.2% | 51.0% | 55.3% | 38.5% | 63.0% | 37.1% | 1995 | 3/3 | 0.7 | 2.3 | 61.4% | 64.7% | 50.6% | 56.7% | 23.6% | 59.2% | 33.3% |
| 20 | 2004 | 47/48 | 9.5 | 3.2 | 62.3% | 75.9% | 55.0% | 45.1% | 40.3% | 67.8% | 37.9% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 2005 | 65/65 | 11.3 | 2.8 | 61.8% | 79.5% | 52.0% | 62.9% | 46.7% | 68.9% | 37.4% | 1997 | 9/12 | 4.7 | 3.1 | 56.8% | 70.9% | 53.7% | 71.4% | 37.5% | 63.3% | 36.1% |
| 22 | 2006 | 70/70 | 9.1 | 2.0 | 62.7% | 75.5% | 53.5% | 64.7% | 44.0% | 67.2% | 37.3% | 1998 | 32/44 | 6.4 | 3.4 | 57.0% | 70.0% | 47.6% | 61.1% | 39.2% | 60.1% | 37.9% |
| 23 | 2007 | 23/23 | 8.3 | 1.7 | 63.5% | 76.8% | 53.0% | 56.1% | 42.7% | 68.0% | 35.4% | 1999 | 28/34 | 6.3 | 2.6 | 57.0% | 71.3% | 54.2% | 62.4% | 45.9% | 63.7% | 39.3% |
| 24 | 2008 | 45/46 | 9.2 | 2.3 | 62.9% | 76.3% | 53.6% | 64.5% | 39.8% | 67.7% | 37.1% | 2000 | 43/49 | 6.5 | 3.6 | 51.7% | 75.2% | 51.3% | 52.4% | 36.7% | 63.8% | 39.1% |
| 25 | 2009 | 19/19 | 7.6 | 1.3 | 60.0% | 73.0% | 57.8% | 59.9% | 30.8% | 66.6% | 37.2% | 2001 | 41/51 | 6.0 | 3.8 | 54.4% | 71.8% | 50.6% | 59.5% | 46.5% | 62.2% | 37.8% |
| 26 | 2010 | 5/5 | 8.0 | 2.6 | 59.8% | 69.0% | 42.0% | 50.6% | 42.4% | 58.0% | 31.3% | 2002 | 38/44 | 7.7 | 4.5 | 58.9% | 76.4% | 51.3% | 60.5% | 43.6% | 66.0% | 39.5% |
| 27 | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2003 | 20/21 | 8.2 | 4.0 | 57.7% | 75.1% | 49.2% | 59.8% | 46.6% | 64.1% | 38.4% |
| 28 | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2004 | 23/23 | 7.3 | 2.4 | 59.7% | 75.5% | 53.2% | 62.6% | 42.2% | 66.4% | 38.8% |
| Career | — | 314/318 | 9.3 | 2.7 | 61.5% | 76.0% | 53.0% | 59.0% | 41.5% | 67.0% | 37.2% | — | 238/282 | 6.6 | 3.5 | 56.2% | 73.3% | 51.0% | 59.6% | 42.0% | 63.5% | 38.5% |
Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.
| Age | Mario Ancic | Nicolas Escude | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1993 | 1498 | 100.2 | -2.06 | +3.59 | 0.464 | 34.1% | — | — | — | 0.0% | -5.00 | — | — | — | -0.22 |
| 18 | 2002 | 1531 | 113.3 | -1.58 | +0.50 | 0.955 | 48.9% | -13 | — | +101 | 37.5% | -0.50 | 2–2 (50%) | 2–2 (50%) | — | +0.28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 2003 | 1622 | 126.7 | +0.21 | +0.64 | 1.003 | 50.1% | -36 | -40 | -47 | 46.1% | -0.20 | 6–9 (40%) | 8–12 (40%) | — | -0.08 | 1995 | 1505 | 108.2 | -1.55 | -1.30 | 0.817 | 47.2% | +30 | — | — | 33.3% | -0.83 | — | 1–1 | — | -0.09 |
| 20 | 2004 | 1725 | 141.5 | +4.07 | +1.16 | 1.178 | 52.4% | -136 | -28 | +99 | 54.0% | +0.48 | 6–9 (40%) | 7–17 (29%) | — | -1.51 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 2005 | 1799 | 152.9 | +5.24 | +0.79 | 1.202 | 53.0% | -15 | -42 | +132 | 64.8% | +1.01 | 5–11 (31%) | 18–11 (62%) | — | +2.76 | 1997 | 1621 | 125.8 | +0.79 | +0.26 | 0.983 | 49.9% | -43 | -32 | — | 48.4% | -0.03 | — | 4–3 (57%) | — | -0.37 |
| 22 | 2006 | 1954 | 149.4 | +4.79 | +0.38 | 1.138 | 52.3% | -48 | -50 | +88 | 64.1% | +0.94 | 21–2 (91%) | 19–14 (58%) | — | +1.74 | 1998 | 1708 | 143.8 | -0.82 | +1.23 | 0.950 | 49.2% | +9 | -93 | -49 | 50.0% | -0.08 | 9–6 (60%) | 8–4 (67%) | — | -1.77 |
| 23 | 2007 | 1882 | 144.6 | +3.39 | -0.07 | 1.107 | 51.5% | -14 | — | — | 60.0% | +0.82 | 2–3 (40%) | 2–4 (33%) | — | +0.28 | 1999 | 1822 | 146.6 | +1.88 | +1.67 | 1.082 | 51.3% | +16 | — | — | 55.3% | +0.26 | 7–6 (54%) | 11–6 (65%) | — | -1.08 |
| 24 | 2008 | 1925 | 152.1 | +4.71 | +1.41 | 1.150 | 52.1% | -36 | -23 | +173 | 58.0% | +0.59 | 9–4 (69%) | 11–11 (50%) | — | -4.16 | 2000 | 1704 | 140.2 | +1.39 | +1.93 | 1.082 | 51.3% | +56 | -130 | -10 | 53.7% | +0.40 | 6–9 (40%) | 7–14 (33%) | — | +1.03 |
| 25 | 2009 | 1918 | 145.3 | +2.66 | +1.24 | 1.114 | 51.2% | +12 | — | — | 55.3% | +0.45 | 6–0 (100%) | 4–4 (50%) | — | -0.19 | 2001 | 1723 | 146.5 | +0.67 | +0.71 | 1.001 | 49.9% | -9 | -144 | +98 | 55.0% | +0.43 | 9–8 (53%) | 10–12 (45%) | — | -0.53 |
| 26 | 2010 | 1877 | 117.6 | -1.67 | -1.63 | 0.746 | 45.6% | +37 | — | — | 33.3% | -0.83 | 2–0 | 1–1 | — | -0.31 | 2002 | 1847 | 151.5 | +3.07 | +1.82 | 1.161 | 52.3% | +54 | -306 | -51 | 63.1% | +0.66 | 8–7 (53%) | 14–2 (88%) | — | -0.81 |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2003 | 1803 | 136.0 | +1.80 | +1.45 | 1.069 | 51.5% | +113 | — | -32 | 59.6% | +0.55 | 3–1 (75%) | 6–4 (60%) | — | -1.00 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2004 | 1835 | 138.5 | +1.43 | +2.19 | 1.155 | 52.1% | +25 | -193 | — | 67.3% | +1.00 | 2–2 (50%) | 7–4 (64%) | — | -0.24 |
| Career | — | 2019 | 150.9 | +3.80 | +0.75 | 1.125 | 51.9% | -37 | -37 | +105 | 57.8% | +0.60 | 59–40 (60%) | 72–76 (49%) | 106.1 | -0.38 | — | 1918 | 150.4 | +1.26 | +1.47 | 1.054 | 50.8% | +30 | -138 | +10 | 55.8% | +0.35 | 44–39 (53%) | 68–50 (58%) | 104.7 | -1.82 |
Career Rivalries
Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.
Nicolas Escude
all rivalries →| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tim Henman | 6 | 4 | 10 | Mar 19, 2003 | H2H |
| Yevgeny Kafelnikov | 2 | 5 | 7 | Oct 11, 2002 | H2H |
| Cedric Pioline | 4 | 3 | 7 | Jun 21, 2002 | H2H |
| Younes El Aynaoui | 4 | 1 | 5 | Jan 8, 2004 | H2H |
| Dominik Hrbaty | 3 | 2 | 5 | Mar 18, 2003 | H2H |