H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC

Mario Ancic vs Nikolay Davydenko H2H: 2-4

Nikolay Davydenko holds a 4–2 lead over Mario Ancic in their ATP head-to-head. Across 6 main-draw meetings, Nikolay Davydenko leads 2–1 on clay, while they are tied 1–1 on hard courts. Most recently, Nikolay Davydenko won the 2008 Rome Masters third round 6-2 6-2.

CRO Age 42 Right-Handed 196 cm / 6'5"
H2H
2 4
6 main draw meetings
RUS Age 45 Right-Handed 178 cm / 5'10"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
May 8, 2008* Rome Masters Masters 1000 R32 Clay Nikolay Davydenko #4 6-2 6-2 Mario Ancic #51 Match data
Apr 3, 2008* Miami Masters Masters 1000 R16 Hard Nikolay Davydenko #4 4-6 6-3 7-5 Mario Ancic #63 Match data
Nov 5, 2006* Paris Masters Masters 1000 QF Carpet Nikolay Davydenko #5 6-3 6-3 Mario Ancic #11 Match data
May 21, 2006* Hamburg Masters Masters 1000 QF Clay Mario Ancic #13 5-7 7-6(4) 6-3 Nikolay Davydenko #6 Match data
Mar 25, 2006* Miami Masters Masters 1000 R16 Hard Mario Ancic #23 7-5 6-4 Nikolay Davydenko #5 Match data
May 21, 2004* St. Poelten ATP 250 R16 Clay Nikolay Davydenko #50 6-4 7-5 Mario Ancic #69 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Mario Ancic #475 #7 2,075 2,019 193 124 60.9% 0 0 0 0 3 3
Nikolay Davydenko #248 #3 5,335 2,213 467 324 59.0% 0 3 1 1 16 21

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Mario Ancic Nikolay Davydenko
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
18 2002 3–7 30.0% #89 1,531 0 0
19 2003 14–18 43.8% #74 1,621 0 0 2000 3–1 75.0% #133 1,544 0 0
20 2004 26–21 55.3% #29 1,732 0 0 2001 6–15 28.6% #79 1,568 0 0
21 2005 42–23 64.6% #21 1,798 0 1 2002 12–24 33.3% #81 1,601 0 0
22 2006 52–18 74.3% #9 1,954 0 3 2003 29–30 49.2% #44 1,595 0 2
23 2007 13–10 56.5% #83 1,880 0 3 2004 32–28 53.3% #28 1,758 0 4
24 2008 29–17 63.0% #36 1,903 0 3 2005 52–29 64.2% #5 1,868 0 5
25 2009 12–7 63.2% #95 1,905 0 3 2006 67–28 70.5% #3 1,971 0 10
26 2010 2–3 40.0% #478 1,866 0 3 2007 53–30 63.9% #4 1,935 0 11
27 2008 51–20 71.8% #5 1,974 0 14
28 2009 57–19 75.0% #6 2,142 0 19
29 2010 29–19 60.4% #22 1,897 0 20
30 2011 26–25 51.0% #41 1,848 0 21
31 2012 23–24 48.9% #44 1,824 0 21
32 2013 22–22 50.0% #53 1,824 0 21
33 2014 5–10 33.3% #250 1,730 0 21