H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Mario Ancic vs Paradorn Srichaphan H2H: 1-1
Mario Ancic and Paradorn Srichaphan are tied 1–1 in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Mario Ancic leads 1–0 on grass, while Paradorn Srichaphan leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Paradorn Srichaphan won the 2005 Los Angeles third round 7-6(6) 6-7(4) 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
CRO
Age 42
Right-Handed
196 cm / 6'5"
H2H
1
–
1
2 main draw meetings
THA
Age 47
Right-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 28, 2005* | Los Angeles | ATP 250 | R32 | Hard | Paradorn Srichaphan | 7-6(6) 6-7(4) 6-2 | Mario Ancic | Match data |
| Jun 12, 2003* | Queen's Club | ATP 250 | R32 | Grass | Mario Ancic | 6-3 6-3 | Paradorn Srichaphan | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mario Ancic | #475 | #7 | 2,075 | 2,019 | 193 | 124 | 60.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
| Paradorn Srichaphan | #1,149 | #9 | 1,925 | 1,997 | 219 | 182 | 54.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 5 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Mario Ancic | Paradorn Srichaphan | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | 2002 | 3–7 | 30.0% | #89 | 1,531 | 0 | 0 | 1997 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #460 | 1,496 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 2003 | 14–18 | 43.8% | #74 | 1,621 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 2004 | 26–21 | 55.3% | #29 | 1,732 | 0 | 0 | 1999 | 10–7 | 58.8% | #99 | 1,639 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2005 | 42–23 | 64.6% | #21 | 1,798 | 0 | 1 | 2000 | 8–16 | 33.3% | #109 | 1,565 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2006 | 52–18 | 74.3% | #9 | 1,954 | 0 | 3 | 2001 | 7–15 | 31.8% | #120 | 1,560 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2007 | 13–10 | 56.5% | #83 | 1,880 | 0 | 3 | 2002 | 46–23 | 66.7% | #16 | 1,962 | 0 | 2 |
| 24 | 2008 | 29–17 | 63.0% | #36 | 1,903 | 0 | 3 | 2003 | 46–27 | 63.0% | #11 | 1,823 | 0 | 4 |
| 25 | 2009 | 12–7 | 63.2% | #95 | 1,905 | 0 | 3 | 2004 | 42–28 | 60.0% | #27 | 1,774 | 0 | 5 |
| 26 | 2010 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #478 | 1,866 | 0 | 3 | 2005 | 31–29 | 51.7% | #42 | 1,794 | 0 | 5 |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2006 | 28–31 | 47.5% | #53 | 1,744 | 0 | 5 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2007 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #628 | 1,636 | 0 | 5 |