H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 07:16 UTC
Mario Ancic vs Paul Goldstein H2H: 1-0
Mario Ancic holds a 1–0 lead over Paul Goldstein in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Mario Ancic leads 1–0 on carpet. Most recently, Mario Ancic won the 2006 St. Petersburg third round 7-5 6-1.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
CRO
Age 42
Right-Handed
196 cm / 6'5"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
USA
Age 49
Right-Handed
178 cm / 5'10"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 26, 2006* | St. Petersburg | ATP 250 | R32 | Carpet | Mario Ancic | 7-5 6-1 | Paul Goldstein | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mario Ancic | #475 | #7 | 2,075 | 2,019 | 193 | 124 | 60.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
| Paul Goldstein | #1,120 | #58 | 668 | 1,746 | 85 | 115 | 42.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Mario Ancic | Paul Goldstein | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1993 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #781 | 1,480 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1994 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #1219 | 1,465 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 2002 | 3–7 | 30.0% | #89 | 1,531 | 0 | 0 | 1995 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #1011 | 1,453 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 2003 | 14–18 | 43.8% | #74 | 1,621 | 0 | 0 | 1996 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #432 | 1,437 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2004 | 26–21 | 55.3% | #29 | 1,732 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 2005 | 42–23 | 64.6% | #21 | 1,798 | 0 | 1 | 1998 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #189 | 1,464 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2006 | 52–18 | 74.3% | #9 | 1,954 | 0 | 3 | 1999 | 12–15 | 44.4% | #89 | 1,615 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2007 | 13–10 | 56.5% | #83 | 1,880 | 0 | 3 | 2000 | 20–23 | 46.5% | #81 | 1,634 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2008 | 29–17 | 63.0% | #36 | 1,903 | 0 | 3 | 2001 | 5–10 | 33.3% | #143 | 1,582 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2009 | 12–7 | 63.2% | #95 | 1,905 | 0 | 3 | 2002 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #182 | 1,561 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2010 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #478 | 1,866 | 0 | 3 | 2003 | 4–5 | 44.4% | #107 | 1,539 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2004 | 4–6 | 40.0% | #190 | 1,585 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2005 | 13–12 | 52.0% | #67 | 1,627 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2006 | 16–21 | 43.2% | #70 | 1,593 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2007 | 9–13 | 40.9% | #166 | 1,575 | 0 | 0 |