H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 07:16 UTC

Mario Ancic vs Paul-Henri Mathieu H2H: 3-1

Mario Ancic holds a 3–1 lead over Paul-Henri Mathieu in their ATP head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Mario Ancic leads 3–1 on hard courts. Most recently, Mario Ancic won the 2007 Paris Masters second round 4-6 6-2 6-3.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Mario Ancic
CRO Age 42 Right-Handed 196 cm / 6'5"
H2H
3 – 1
4 main draw meetings
Paul-Henri Mathieu
FRA Age 44 Right-Handed 185 cm / 6'1"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Oct 30, 2007* Paris Masters Masters 1000 R64 Hard Mario Ancic #67 4-6 6-2 6-3 Paul-Henri Mathieu #19 Match data
Oct 19, 2007* Madrid Masters Masters 1000 R16 Hard Mario Ancic #49 6-4 6-3 Paul-Henri Mathieu #21 Match data
Aug 8, 2007* Canada Masters Masters 1000 R32 Hard Paul-Henri Mathieu #23 6-3 6-2 Mario Ancic #38 Match data
Mar 9, 2006* Indian Wells Masters Masters 1000 R32 Hard Mario Ancic #23 7-6(5) 6-3 Paul-Henri Mathieu #35 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Mario Ancic #475 #7 2,075 2,019 193 124 60.9% 0 0 0 0 3 3
Paul-Henri Mathieu #914 #12 2,000 1,961 268 297 47.4% 0 0 0 0 4 4

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Mario Ancic Paul-Henri Mathieu
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
18 2002 3–7 30.0% #89 1,531 0 0 2000 2–3 40.0% #275 1,487 0 0
19 2003 14–18 43.8% #74 1,621 0 0 2001 0–2 0.0% #150 1,468 0 0
20 2004 26–21 55.3% #29 1,732 0 0 2002 23–14 62.2% #36 1,838 0 2
21 2005 42–23 64.6% #21 1,798 0 1 2003 16–23 41.0% #83 1,683 0 2
22 2006 52–18 74.3% #9 1,954 0 3 2004 9–10 47.4% #123 1,661 0 2
23 2007 13–10 56.5% #83 1,880 0 3 2005 26–27 49.1% #46 1,720 0 2
24 2008 29–17 63.0% #36 1,903 0 3 2006 23–28 45.1% #55 1,668 0 2
25 2009 12–7 63.2% #95 1,905 0 3 2007 45–23 66.2% #25 1,870 0 4
26 2010 2–3 40.0% #478 1,866 0 3 2008 29–25 53.7% #31 1,746 0 4
27 — — — — — — — 2009 28–29 49.1% #33 1,748 0 4
28 — — — — — — — 2010 10–19 34.5% #97 1,731 0 4
30 — — — — — — — 2012 14–17 45.2% #58 1,822 0 4
31 — — — — — — — 2013 6–19 24.0% #129 1,720 0 4
32 — — — — — — — 2014 11–17 39.3% #96 1,759 0 4
33 — — — — — — — 2015 7–12 36.8% #95 1,761 0 4
34 — — — — — — — 2016 18–20 47.4% #73 1,679 0 4
35 — — — — — — — 2017 1–9 10.0% #249 1,574 0 4