H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 01:16 UTC
Mario Ancic vs Raemon Sluiter H2H: 4-0
Mario Ancic holds a 4–0 lead over Raemon Sluiter in their ATP head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Mario Ancic leads 2–0 on hard courts and 1–0 on carpet. Most recently, Mario Ancic won the 2006 St. Petersburg fourth round 6-3 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
CRO
Age 42
Right-Handed
196 cm / 6'5"
H2H
4
–
0
4 main draw meetings
NED
Age 48
Right-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 27, 2006* | St. Petersburg | ATP 250 | R16 | Carpet | Mario Ancic | 6-3 6-4 | Raemon Sluiter | Match data |
| Jun 23, 2006* | S Hertogenbosch | ATP 250 | R16 | Grass | Mario Ancic | 6-7(7) 7-5 6-2 | Raemon Sluiter | Match data |
| Jan 21, 2004* | Australian Open | Grand Slam | R128 | Hard | Mario Ancic | 6-7(4) 6-4 3-6 6-4 6-3 | Raemon Sluiter | Match data |
| Oct 24, 2003* | Stockholm | ATP 250 | R16 | Hard | Mario Ancic | 6-7(7) 6-4 7-6(3) | Raemon Sluiter | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mario Ancic | #475 | #7 | 2,075 | 2,019 | 193 | 124 | 60.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
| Raemon Sluiter | #1,007 | #46 | 742 | 1,749 | 84 | 121 | 41.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Mario Ancic | Raemon Sluiter | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | 2002 | 3–7 | 30.0% | #89 | 1,531 | 0 | 0 | 1996 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #716 | 1,492 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 2003 | 14–18 | 43.8% | #74 | 1,621 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 2004 | 26–21 | 55.3% | #29 | 1,732 | 0 | 0 | 1998 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #241 | 1,484 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2005 | 42–23 | 64.6% | #21 | 1,798 | 0 | 1 | 1999 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #162 | 1,474 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2006 | 52–18 | 74.3% | #9 | 1,954 | 0 | 3 | 2000 | 8–7 | 53.3% | #95 | 1,623 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2007 | 13–10 | 56.5% | #83 | 1,880 | 0 | 3 | 2001 | 7–12 | 36.8% | #131 | 1,617 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2008 | 29–17 | 63.0% | #36 | 1,903 | 0 | 3 | 2002 | 10–14 | 41.7% | #71 | 1,660 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2009 | 12–7 | 63.2% | #95 | 1,905 | 0 | 3 | 2003 | 19–24 | 44.2% | #59 | 1,630 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2010 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #478 | 1,866 | 0 | 3 | 2004 | 19–22 | 46.3% | #82 | 1,624 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2005 | 5–14 | 26.3% | #106 | 1,540 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2006 | 8–15 | 34.8% | #119 | 1,574 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2007 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #169 | 1,597 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2008 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #1040 | 1,587 | 0 | 0 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2009 | 4–1 | 80.0% | #197 | 1,650 | 0 | 0 |