H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 07:16 UTC
Mario Ancic vs Rainer Schuettler H2H: 3-0
Mario Ancic holds a 3–0 lead over Rainer Schuettler in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Mario Ancic leads 3–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Mario Ancic won the 2009 Rotterdam third round 7-5 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
CRO
Age 42
Right-Handed
196 cm / 6'5"
H2H
3
–
0
3 main draw meetings
GER
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 12, 2009* | Rotterdam | ATP 500 | R32 | Hard | Mario Ancic | 7-5 6-2 | Rainer Schuettler | Match data |
| Oct 28, 2008* | Paris Masters | Masters 1000 | R64 | Hard | Mario Ancic | 6-4 3-6 6-1 | Rainer Schuettler | Match data |
| Oct 6, 2006* | Tokyo | ATP 250 | R16 | Hard | Mario Ancic | 6-2 4-6 6-4 | Rainer Schuettler | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mario Ancic | #475 | #7 | 2,075 | 2,019 | 193 | 124 | 60.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
| Rainer Schuettler | #1,007 | #5 | 3,205 | 1,989 | 313 | 323 | 49.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 4 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Mario Ancic | Rainer Schuettler | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 2002 | 3–7 | 30.0% | #89 | 1,531 | 0 | 0 | 1995 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #446 | 1,494 | 0 | 0 |
| 2003 | 14–18 | 43.8% | #74 | 1,621 | 0 | 0 | 1997 | 5–2 | 71.4% | #117 | 1,567 | 0 | 0 |
| 2004 | 26–21 | 55.3% | #29 | 1,732 | 0 | 0 | 1998 | 12–15 | 44.4% | #124 | 1,587 | 0 | 0 |
| 2005 | 42–23 | 64.6% | #21 | 1,798 | 0 | 1 | 1999 | 23–28 | 45.1% | #48 | 1,609 | 0 | 1 |
| 2006 | 52–18 | 74.3% | #9 | 1,954 | 0 | 3 | 2000 | 20–25 | 44.4% | #45 | 1,687 | 0 | 1 |
| 2007 | 13–10 | 56.5% | #83 | 1,880 | 0 | 3 | 2001 | 33–31 | 51.6% | #43 | 1,780 | 0 | 2 |
| 2008 | 29–17 | 63.0% | #36 | 1,903 | 0 | 3 | 2002 | 38–29 | 56.7% | #33 | 1,715 | 0 | 2 |
| 2009 | 12–7 | 63.2% | #95 | 1,905 | 0 | 3 | 2003 | 70–27 | 72.2% | #6 | 1,956 | 0 | 4 |
| 2010 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #478 | 1,866 | 0 | 3 | 2004 | 25–28 | 47.2% | #42 | 1,718 | 0 | 4 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2005 | 17–24 | 41.5% | #88 | 1,675 | 0 | 4 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2006 | 10–22 | 31.2% | #97 | 1,536 | 0 | 4 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2007 | 7–13 | 35.0% | #99 | 1,650 | 0 | 4 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2008 | 20–22 | 47.6% | #33 | 1,744 | 0 | 4 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2009 | 15–26 | 36.6% | #85 | 1,641 | 0 | 4 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2010 | 13–17 | 43.3% | #84 | 1,666 | 0 | 4 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2011 | 5–13 | 27.8% | #132 | 1,648 | 0 | 4 |