H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 19:16 UTC
Mario Ancic vs Steve Darcis H2H: 2-0
Mario Ancic holds a 2–0 lead over Steve Darcis in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Mario Ancic leads 1–0 on grass and 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Mario Ancic won the 2008 Stockholm fourth round 7-6(4) 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
CRO
Age 42
Right-Handed
196 cm / 6'5"
H2H
2
–
0
2 main draw meetings
BEL
Age 42
Right-Handed
178 cm / 5'10"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 10, 2008* | Stockholm | ATP 250 | R16 | Hard | Mario Ancic | 7-6(4) 6-4 | Steve Darcis | Match data |
| Jun 20, 2008* | S Hertogenbosch | ATP 250 | R16 | Grass | Mario Ancic | 6-2 6-4 | Steve Darcis | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mario Ancic | #475 | #7 | 2,075 | 2,019 | 193 | 124 | 60.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
| Steve Darcis | #756 | #38 | 1,362 | 1,832 | 92 | 122 | 43.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Mario Ancic | Steve Darcis | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | 2002 | 3–7 | 30.0% | #89 | 1,531 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 2003 | 14–18 | 43.8% | #74 | 1,621 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 2004 | 26–21 | 55.3% | #29 | 1,732 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 2005 | 42–23 | 64.6% | #21 | 1,798 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 2006 | 52–18 | 74.3% | #9 | 1,954 | 0 | 3 | 2006 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #483 | 1,472 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2007 | 13–10 | 56.5% | #83 | 1,880 | 0 | 3 | 2007 | 6–2 | 75.0% | #86 | 1,667 | 0 | 1 |
| 24 | 2008 | 29–17 | 63.0% | #36 | 1,903 | 0 | 3 | 2008 | 20–19 | 51.3% | #61 | 1,772 | 0 | 2 |
| 25 | 2009 | 12–7 | 63.2% | #95 | 1,905 | 0 | 3 | 2009 | 5–18 | 21.7% | #122 | 1,564 | 0 | 2 |
| 26 | 2010 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #478 | 1,866 | 0 | 3 | 2010 | 4–6 | 40.0% | #109 | 1,685 | 0 | 2 |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2011 | 7–6 | 53.8% | #88 | 1,796 | 0 | 2 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2012 | 17–17 | 50.0% | #93 | 1,756 | 0 | 2 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2013 | 2–7 | 22.2% | #164 | 1,678 | 0 | 2 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2014 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #160 | 1,676 | 0 | 2 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2015 | 8–11 | 42.1% | #86 | 1,729 | 0 | 2 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2016 | 3–5 | 37.5% | #86 | 1,761 | 0 | 2 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2017 | 16–18 | 47.1% | #77 | 1,799 | 0 | 2 |
| 35 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2019 | 4–11 | 26.7% | #157 | 1,664 | 0 | 2 |