H2H data updated: 2026-09-02 00:00 UTC

Mario Ancic vs Steve Darcis H2H: 2-0

Mario Ancic holds a 2–0 lead over Steve Darcis in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Mario Ancic leads 1–0 on grass and 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Mario Ancic won the 2008 Stockholm Open second round 7-6(4) 6-4.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Mario Ancic
CRO Age 42 Right-Handed 196 cm / 6'5"
H2H
2 – 0
2 main draw meetings
Steve Darcis
BEL Age 42 Right-Handed 178 cm / 5'10"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Mario Ancic #31 7-6(4) 6-4 Steve Darcis #58 Match data Oct 10, 2008* R16 Stockholm Open International Series → modern equivalent ATP 250 Hard
Mario Ancic #43 6-2 6-4 Steve Darcis #52 Match data Jun 20, 2008* R16 Libéma Open International Series → modern equivalent ATP 250 Grass

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Mario Ancic #475 #7 2,075 2,019 193 125 60.7% 0 0 0 0 3 3
Steve Darcis #756 #38 1,362 1,852 94 124 43.1% 0 0 0 1 1 2

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Mario Ancic Steve Darcis
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
18 2002 3–7 30.0% #89 1,530 0 0 — — — — — — —
19 2003 14–18 43.8% #74 1,621 0 0 — — — — — — —
20 2004 26–22 54.2% #29 1,725 0 0 — — — — — — —
21 2005 42–23 64.6% #21 1,799 0 1 — — — — — — —
22 2006 52–18 74.3% #9 1,954 0 3 2006 0–1 0.0% #483 1,472 0 0
23 2007 13–10 56.5% #83 1,881 0 3 2007 6–2 75.0% #86 1,667 0 1
24 2008 29–17 63.0% #36 1,925 0 3 2008 20–20 50.0% #61 1,761 0 2
25 2009 12–7 63.2% #95 1,917 0 3 2009 5–18 21.7% #122 1,544 0 2
26 2010 2–3 40.0% #478 1,876 0 3 2010 4–6 40.0% #109 1,678 0 2
27 — — — — — — — 2011 7–6 53.8% #88 1,794 0 2
28 — — — — — — — 2012 19–18 51.4% #93 1,785 0 2
29 — — — — — — — 2013 2–7 22.2% #164 1,717 0 2
30 — — — — — — — 2014 0–1 0.0% #160 1,706 0 2
31 — — — — — — — 2015 8–11 42.1% #86 1,738 0 2
32 — — — — — — — 2016 3–5 37.5% #86 1,773 0 2
33 — — — — — — — 2017 16–18 47.1% #77 1,807 0 2
35 — — — — — — — 2019 4–11 26.7% #157 1,668 0 2

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Mario Ancic Steve Darcis
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
18 2002 2 5 7 28.6% — — — — 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 2003 9 13 22 40.9% 3 2 5 60.0% 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 2004 6 10 16 37.5% 6 5 11 54.5% 10 3 13 76.9% 4 4 8 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
21 2005 24 13 37 64.9% 6 5 11 54.5% 9 2 11 81.8% 3 3 6 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
22 2006 24 11 35 68.6% 11 4 15 73.3% 9 1 10 90.0% 8 2 10 80.0% 2006 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
23 2007 12 9 21 57.1% — — — — — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% 2007 0 1 1 0.0% 6 1 7 85.7% — — — — — — — —
24 2008 15 9 24 62.5% 6 5 11 54.5% 8 3 11 72.7% — — — — 2008 10 9 19 52.6% 6 7 13 46.2% 2 3 5 40.0% 2 1 3 66.7%
25 2009 12 6 18 66.7% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 2009 1 10 11 9.1% 0 5 5 0.0% 4 3 7 57.1% — — — —
26 2010 2 2 4 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 2010 3 3 6 50.0% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — — — — —
27 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2011 5 3 8 62.5% 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — — — — —
28 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2012 9 9 18 50.0% 4 5 9 44.4% 6 4 10 60.0% — — — —
29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2013 1 3 4 25.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — —
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2014 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2015 6 6 12 50.0% 2 4 6 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2016 2 4 6 33.3% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — —
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2017 12 10 22 54.5% 2 4 6 33.3% 2 4 6 33.3% — — — —
35 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2019 3 7 10 30.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — —
Career — 106 78 184 57.6% 32 23 55 58.2% 39 14 53 73.6% 16 10 26 61.5% — 52 66 118 44.1% 24 38 62 38.7% 16 19 35 45.7% 2 1 3 66.7%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 314/318 of Mario Ancic's and 209/218 of Steve Darcis's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Mario Ancic Steve Darcis
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
18 2002 8/10 7.0 6.0 49.1% 75.0% 44.7% 54.2% 29.0% 59.8% 38.4% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
19 2003 32/32 8.4 4.3 57.9% 72.2% 51.0% 55.3% 38.5% 63.0% 37.1% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
20 2004 47/48 9.5 3.2 62.3% 75.9% 55.0% 45.1% 40.3% 67.8% 37.9% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
21 2005 65/65 11.3 2.8 61.8% 79.5% 52.0% 62.9% 46.7% 68.9% 37.4% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
22 2006 70/70 9.1 2.0 62.7% 75.5% 53.5% 64.7% 44.0% 67.2% 37.3% 2006 1/1 2.0 3.0 53.8% 60.5% 59.5% 75.0% — 60.0% 24.5%
23 2007 23/23 8.3 1.7 63.5% 76.8% 53.0% 56.1% 42.7% 68.0% 35.4% 2007 8/8 4.4 1.9 56.6% 74.9% 49.9% 48.9% 42.3% 64.3% 41.9%
24 2008 45/46 9.2 2.3 62.9% 76.3% 53.6% 64.5% 39.8% 67.7% 37.1% 2008 39/40 4.9 1.9 60.0% 69.3% 51.1% 57.2% 42.3% 61.6% 36.0%
25 2009 19/19 7.6 1.3 60.0% 73.0% 57.8% 59.9% 30.8% 66.6% 37.2% 2009 22/23 4.5 2.3 57.6% 71.8% 50.5% 57.3% 37.5% 62.8% 34.1%
26 2010 5/5 8.0 2.6 59.8% 69.0% 42.0% 50.6% 42.4% 58.0% 31.3% 2010 10/10 3.2 1.9 60.1% 66.2% 50.4% 55.2% 46.3% 59.9% 35.6%
27 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2011 13/13 5.2 3.8 58.6% 68.5% 48.8% 53.9% 44.7% 60.0% 37.3%
28 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2012 33/37 4.1 1.3 63.4% 69.0% 51.7% 56.0% 41.1% 62.7% 37.1%
29 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2013 8/9 4.0 2.6 62.5% 69.4% 52.7% 51.2% 30.6% 62.7% 33.5%
30 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2014 1/1 9.0 6.0 61.3% 67.0% 58.5% 68.8% 46.2% 63.7% 37.9%
31 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2015 18/19 2.6 2.3 62.3% 64.5% 50.0% 64.6% 38.6% 59.5% 35.3%
32 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2016 8/8 4.5 4.3 54.5% 71.3% 52.0% 52.8% 38.9% 62.4% 36.9%
33 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2017 33/34 3.3 1.5 61.7% 67.8% 46.8% 54.4% 44.9% 58.8% 36.9%
35 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2019 15/15 3.6 1.9 62.3% 66.1% 47.3% 62.1% 36.9% 58.5% 31.7%
Career — 314/318 9.3 2.7 61.5% 76.0% 53.0% 59.0% 41.5% 67.0% 37.2% — 209/218 4.1 2.1 60.6% 68.7% 50.0% 56.7% 40.9% 61.1% 35.9%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Mario Ancic Steve Darcis
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
18 2002 1531 113.3 -1.58 +0.50 0.955 48.9% -13 — +101 37.5% -0.50 2–2 (50%) 2–2 (50%) — +0.28 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 2003 1622 126.7 +0.21 +0.64 1.003 50.1% -36 -40 -47 46.1% -0.20 6–9 (40%) 8–12 (40%) — -0.08 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 2004 1725 141.5 +4.07 +1.16 1.178 52.4% -136 -28 +99 54.0% +0.48 6–9 (40%) 7–17 (29%) — -1.51 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
21 2005 1799 152.9 +5.24 +0.79 1.202 53.0% -15 -42 +132 64.8% +1.01 5–11 (31%) 18–11 (62%) — +2.76 2005 1487 100.0 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
22 2006 1954 149.4 +4.79 +0.38 1.138 52.3% -48 -50 +88 64.1% +0.94 21–2 (91%) 19–14 (58%) — +1.74 2006 1472 94.9 -4.72 -4.47 0.613 45.9% — — — 0.0% -2.50 — — — +0.17
23 2007 1882 144.6 +3.39 -0.07 1.107 51.5% -14 — — 60.0% +0.82 2–3 (40%) 2–4 (33%) — +0.28 2007 1667 133.9 +1.36 +2.37 1.174 53.0% — +39 — 66.7% +1.00 2–1 (67%) 4–1 (80%) — -0.67
24 2008 1925 152.1 +4.71 +1.41 1.150 52.1% -36 -23 +173 58.0% +0.59 9–4 (69%) 11–11 (50%) — -4.16 2008 1761 135.5 -1.36 -0.31 0.939 49.3% -35 -44 -175 50.0% -0.07 6–4 (60%) 12–5 (71%) — -0.16
25 2009 1918 145.3 +2.66 +1.24 1.114 51.2% +12 — — 55.3% +0.45 6–0 (100%) 4–4 (50%) — -0.19 2009 1545 116.6 -1.07 -1.53 0.918 48.7% +10 +55 +98 24.1% -1.26 1–4 (20%) 2–8 (20%) — +0.42
26 2010 1877 117.6 -1.67 -1.63 0.746 45.6% +37 — — 33.3% -0.83 2–0 1–1 — -0.31 2010 1678 128.9 -1.59 -0.51 0.889 48.2% +4 -43 — 52.6% +0.26 0–1 — — -0.11
27 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2011 1795 125.8 -2.07 -0.57 0.934 48.6% -43 -55 — 47.4% -0.03 4–1 (80%) 2–2 (50%) — -0.14
28 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2012 1786 143.8 -0.59 +0.30 0.994 50.0% -43 -40 -50 54.4% -0.01 7–8 (47%) 16–3 (84%) — -2.70
29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2013 1717 114.5 -0.61 -0.45 0.898 48.1% -62 — +57 33.3% -1.05 0–1 3–3 (50%) — -0.52
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2014 1706 110.7 +1.34 +0.22 1.043 51.1% — — — 40.0% +0.40 0–1 0–1 — -0.14
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2015 1739 139.6 -2.44 0.00 0.871 47.8% +50 -47 — 43.2% -0.60 2–2 (50%) 2–2 (50%) — -1.13
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2016 1773 129.3 -0.69 +1.36 0.982 49.4% -2 — — 40.7% -0.33 2–1 (67%) 2–2 (50%) — +0.32
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2017 1807 136.2 -3.10 +0.27 0.897 47.9% +17 -72 -137 48.1% -0.27 4–3 (57%) 2–7 (22%) — -1.06
35 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2019 1669 114.6 -4.04 -3.13 0.764 45.3% +41 — +47 32.4% -1.27 1–2 (33%) 1–1 — +0.76
36 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2020 1648 99.0 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 2019 150.9 +3.80 +0.75 1.125 51.9% -37 -37 +105 57.8% +0.60 59–40 (60%) 72–76 (49%) 106.1 -0.38 — 1852 137.3 -1.67 -0.31 0.923 48.7% -5 -28 -35 45.2% -0.33 29–29 (50%) 46–35 (57%) 105.6 -2.32

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.