H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 19:16 UTC
Mario Ancic vs Teymuraz Gabashvili H2H: 2-0
Mario Ancic holds a 2–0 lead over Teymuraz Gabashvili in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Mario Ancic leads 2–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Mario Ancic won the 2009 Zagreb fourth round 6-1 6-1.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
CRO
Age 42
Right-Handed
196 cm / 6'5"
H2H
2
–
0
2 main draw meetings
RUS
Age 41
Right-Handed
188 cm / 6'2"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 6, 2009* | Zagreb | ATP 250 | R16 | Hard | Mario Ancic | 6-1 6-1 | Teymuraz Gabashvili | Match data |
| Feb 15, 2008* | Marseille | ATP 250 | R16 | Hard | Mario Ancic | 6-3 6-2 | Teymuraz Gabashvili | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mario Ancic | #475 | #7 | 2,075 | 2,019 | 193 | 124 | 60.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
| Teymuraz Gabashvili | #1,373 | #43 | 1,226 | 1,836 | 109 | 194 | 36.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Mario Ancic | Teymuraz Gabashvili | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | 2002 | 3–7 | 30.0% | #89 | 1,531 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 2003 | 14–18 | 43.8% | #74 | 1,621 | 0 | 0 | 2004 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #258 | 1,482 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2004 | 26–21 | 55.3% | #29 | 1,732 | 0 | 0 | 2005 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #132 | 1,459 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2005 | 42–23 | 64.6% | #21 | 1,798 | 0 | 1 | 2006 | 6–12 | 33.3% | #112 | 1,519 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2006 | 52–18 | 74.3% | #9 | 1,954 | 0 | 3 | 2007 | 10–28 | 26.3% | #125 | 1,600 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2007 | 13–10 | 56.5% | #83 | 1,880 | 0 | 3 | 2008 | 13–13 | 50.0% | #65 | 1,663 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2008 | 29–17 | 63.0% | #36 | 1,903 | 0 | 3 | 2009 | 12–24 | 33.3% | #106 | 1,557 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2009 | 12–7 | 63.2% | #95 | 1,905 | 0 | 3 | 2010 | 10–16 | 38.5% | #80 | 1,688 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2010 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #478 | 1,866 | 0 | 3 | 2011 | 10–19 | 34.5% | #138 | 1,658 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2012 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #182 | 1,581 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2013 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #76 | 1,626 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2014 | 17–25 | 40.5% | #67 | 1,732 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2015 | 16–21 | 43.2% | #50 | 1,774 | 0 | 0 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2016 | 10–21 | 32.3% | #138 | 1,640 | 0 | 0 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2017 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #237 | 1,540 | 0 | 0 |