H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 07:16 UTC
Mario Ancic vs Todd Martin H2H: 1-0
Mario Ancic holds a 1–0 lead over Todd Martin in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Mario Ancic leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Mario Ancic won the 2004 Queen's Club third round 7-6(5) 4-6 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
CRO
Age 42
Right-Handed
196 cm / 6'5"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
USA
Age 56
Right-Handed
198 cm / 6'6"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 10, 2004* | Queen's Club | ATP 250 | R32 | Grass | Mario Ancic | 7-6(5) 4-6 6-2 | Todd Martin | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mario Ancic | #475 | #7 | 2,075 | 2,019 | 193 | 124 | 60.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
| Todd Martin | #145 | #4 | 2,969 | 2,063 | 398 | 222 | 64.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 8 | 8 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Mario Ancic | Todd Martin | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | 2002 | 3–7 | 30.0% | #89 | 1,531 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 2003 | 14–18 | 43.8% | #74 | 1,621 | 0 | 0 | 1990 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #269 | 1,508 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2004 | 26–21 | 55.3% | #29 | 1,732 | 0 | 0 | 1991 | 10–8 | 55.6% | #134 | 1,648 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2005 | 42–23 | 64.6% | #21 | 1,798 | 0 | 1 | 1992 | 22–19 | 53.7% | #87 | 1,724 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2006 | 52–18 | 74.3% | #9 | 1,954 | 0 | 3 | 1993 | 45–23 | 66.2% | #13 | 1,886 | 0 | 1 |
| 23 | 2007 | 13–10 | 56.5% | #83 | 1,880 | 0 | 3 | 1994 | 50–19 | 72.5% | #10 | 1,943 | 0 | 3 |
| 24 | 2008 | 29–17 | 63.0% | #36 | 1,903 | 0 | 3 | 1995 | 45–21 | 68.2% | #18 | 1,912 | 0 | 4 |
| 25 | 2009 | 12–7 | 63.2% | #95 | 1,905 | 0 | 3 | 1996 | 49–20 | 71.0% | #12 | 1,926 | 0 | 5 |
| 26 | 2010 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #478 | 1,866 | 0 | 3 | 1997 | 13–7 | 65.0% | #81 | 1,914 | 0 | 5 |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1998 | 43–20 | 68.3% | #16 | 1,998 | 0 | 7 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1999 | 42–17 | 71.2% | #7 | 1,914 | 0 | 8 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2000 | 14–11 | 56.0% | #55 | 1,887 | 0 | 8 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2001 | 13–11 | 54.2% | #57 | 1,823 | 0 | 8 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2002 | 24–16 | 60.0% | #47 | 1,788 | 0 | 8 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2003 | 15–11 | 57.7% | #68 | 1,828 | 0 | 8 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2004 | 10–15 | 40.0% | #145 | 1,684 | 0 | 8 |