H2H data updated: 2026-09-02 00:00 UTC

Mario Ancic vs Tommy Haas H2H: 2-1

Mario Ancic holds a 2–1 lead over Tommy Haas in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Mario Ancic leads 2–1 on hard courts. Most recently, Mario Ancic won the 2007 Cincinnati Open first round 3-6 7-6(3) 6-3.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Mario Ancic
CRO Age 42 Right-Handed 196 cm / 6'5"
H2H
2 – 1
3 main draw meetings
Tommy Haas
GER Age 48 Right-Handed 188 cm / 6'2"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Mario Ancic #38 3-6 7-6(3) 6-3 Tommy Haas #9 Match data Aug 15, 2007* R64 Cincinnati Open Masters 1000 Hard
Mario Ancic #20 6-4 6-4 Tommy Haas #17 Match data Mar 24, 2005* R32 Miami Open Masters 1000 Hard
Tommy Haas #46 6-1 7-5 Mario Ancic #27 Match data Aug 17, 2004* R64 Athens Olympics Olympics Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Mario Ancic #475 #7 2,075 2,019 193 125 60.7% 0 0 0 0 3 3
Tommy Haas #616 #2 3,030 2,116 540 333 61.9% 0 1 0 4 10 15

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Mario Ancic Tommy Haas
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
18 2002 3–7 30.0% #89 1,530 0 0 1996 4–3 57.1% #170 1,588 0 0
19 2003 14–18 43.8% #74 1,621 0 0 1997 22–17 56.4% #45 1,722 0 0
20 2004 26–22 54.2% #29 1,725 0 0 1998 34–26 56.7% #34 1,820 0 0
21 2005 42–23 64.6% #21 1,799 0 1 1999 45–23 66.2% #11 1,833 0 1
22 2006 52–18 74.3% #9 1,954 0 3 2000 32–21 60.4% #23 1,813 0 1
23 2007 13–10 56.5% #83 1,881 0 3 2001 53–21 71.6% #8 2,011 0 5
24 2008 29–17 63.0% #36 1,925 0 3 2002 43–22 66.2% #11 1,863 0 5
25 2009 12–7 63.2% #95 1,917 0 3 — — — — — — —
26 2010 2–3 40.0% #478 1,876 0 3 2004 36–19 65.5% #17 1,916 0 7
27 — — — — — — — 2005 28–21 57.1% #45 1,767 0 7
28 — — — — — — — 2006 48–19 71.6% #11 1,892 0 10
29 — — — — — — — 2007 36–17 67.9% #12 1,894 0 11
30 — — — — — — — 2008 18–15 54.5% #82 1,857 0 11
31 — — — — — — — 2009 31–18 63.3% #18 1,940 0 12
32 — — — — — — — 2010 3–4 42.9% #372 1,865 0 12
33 — — — — — — — 2011 7–12 36.8% #205 1,771 0 12
34 — — — — — — — 2012 31–17 64.6% #21 1,975 0 13
35 — — — — — — — 2013 47–24 66.2% #12 2,024 0 15
36 — — — — — — — 2014 14–11 56.0% #77 1,911 0 15
37 — — — — — — — 2015 2–9 18.2% #470 1,788 0 15
39 — — — — — — — 2017 6–14 30.0% #252 1,689 0 15

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Mario Ancic Tommy Haas
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
18 2002 2 5 7 28.6% — — — — 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 1996 4 3 7 57.1% — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 2003 9 13 22 40.9% 3 2 5 60.0% 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — 1997 10 8 18 55.6% 5 3 8 62.5% 2 2 4 50.0% 5 4 9 55.6%
20 2004 6 10 16 37.5% 6 5 11 54.5% 10 3 13 76.9% 4 4 8 50.0% 1998 18 15 33 54.5% 6 6 12 50.0% 3 2 5 60.0% 7 3 10 70.0%
21 2005 24 13 37 64.9% 6 5 11 54.5% 9 2 11 81.8% 3 3 6 50.0% 1999 25 12 37 67.6% 11 6 17 64.7% 7 3 10 70.0% 2 2 4 50.0%
22 2006 24 11 35 68.6% 11 4 15 73.3% 9 1 10 90.0% 8 2 10 80.0% 2000 18 9 27 66.7% 10 7 17 58.8% 2 2 4 50.0% 2 3 5 40.0%
23 2007 12 9 21 57.1% — — — — — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% 2001 41 12 53 77.4% 5 5 10 50.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 6 2 8 75.0%
24 2008 15 9 24 62.5% 6 5 11 54.5% 8 3 11 72.7% — — — — 2002 25 14 39 64.1% 17 7 24 70.8% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0%
25 2009 12 6 18 66.7% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
26 2010 2 2 4 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 2004 24 11 35 68.6% 8 5 13 61.5% 3 2 5 60.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
27 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2005 15 12 27 55.6% 7 5 12 58.3% 3 2 5 60.0% 3 2 5 60.0%
28 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2006 34 10 44 77.3% 5 5 10 50.0% 5 2 7 71.4% 4 2 6 66.7%
29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2007 31 13 44 70.5% 2 3 5 40.0% 3 1 4 75.0% — — — —
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2008 15 11 26 57.7% 0 2 2 0.0% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — —
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2009 15 14 29 51.7% 6 3 9 66.7% 10 1 11 90.9% — — — —
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2010 3 4 7 42.9% — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2011 6 8 14 42.9% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — —
34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2012 16 12 28 57.1% 10 4 14 71.4% 5 1 6 83.3% — — — —
35 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2013 28 15 43 65.1% 14 7 21 66.7% 5 2 7 71.4% — — — —
36 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2014 7 6 13 53.8% 7 5 12 58.3% — — — — — — — —
37 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2015 0 5 5 0.0% — — — — 2 4 6 33.3% — — — —
39 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2017 0 3 3 0.0% 4 8 12 33.3% 2 3 5 40.0% — — — —
Career — 106 78 184 57.6% 32 23 55 58.2% 39 14 53 73.6% 16 10 26 61.5% — 335 197 532 63.0% 117 82 199 58.8% 57 34 91 62.6% 31 20 51 60.8%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 314/318 of Mario Ancic's and 805/873 of Tommy Haas's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Mario Ancic Tommy Haas
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
18 2002 8/10 7.0 6.0 49.1% 75.0% 44.7% 54.2% 29.0% 59.8% 38.4% 1996 7/7 3.7 3.9 53.5% 70.9% 59.6% 71.3% 67.6% 65.3% 36.7%
19 2003 32/32 8.4 4.3 57.9% 72.2% 51.0% 55.3% 38.5% 63.0% 37.1% 1997 36/39 5.5 3.8 59.8% 71.0% 49.5% 55.1% 44.9% 62.5% 38.5%
20 2004 47/48 9.5 3.2 62.3% 75.9% 55.0% 45.1% 40.3% 67.8% 37.9% 1998 51/60 4.9 4.1 58.9% 71.1% 48.0% 55.1% 44.2% 61.3% 39.1%
21 2005 65/65 11.3 2.8 61.8% 79.5% 52.0% 62.9% 46.7% 68.9% 37.4% 1999 54/68 8.4 5.6 53.0% 76.3% 50.6% 62.2% 43.2% 64.2% 35.9%
22 2006 70/70 9.1 2.0 62.7% 75.5% 53.5% 64.7% 44.0% 67.2% 37.3% 2000 39/53 7.0 4.4 54.3% 74.2% 51.0% 59.5% 43.0% 63.5% 35.9%
23 2007 23/23 8.3 1.7 63.5% 76.8% 53.0% 56.1% 42.7% 68.0% 35.4% 2001 62/74 7.7 3.9 56.4% 76.7% 52.4% 64.4% 42.5% 66.0% 39.7%
24 2008 45/46 9.2 2.3 62.9% 76.3% 53.6% 64.5% 39.8% 67.7% 37.1% 2002 58/65 8.8 4.8 56.0% 75.4% 52.7% 61.9% 39.6% 65.5% 37.1%
25 2009 19/19 7.6 1.3 60.0% 73.0% 57.8% 59.9% 30.8% 66.6% 37.2% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
26 2010 5/5 8.0 2.6 59.8% 69.0% 42.0% 50.6% 42.4% 58.0% 31.3% 2004 53/55 5.9 3.4 57.9% 75.9% 52.0% 57.3% 46.4% 65.7% 39.2%
27 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2005 49/49 6.7 3.6 57.8% 74.3% 52.7% 52.9% 43.6% 65.2% 37.8%
28 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2006 67/67 7.1 3.2 61.0% 76.4% 54.5% 60.1% 40.2% 67.9% 38.3%
29 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2007 52/53 8.0 3.0 60.6% 78.1% 55.6% 61.9% 43.3% 69.0% 38.7%
30 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2008 32/33 7.3 3.8 59.4% 72.6% 52.0% 62.8% 40.9% 64.3% 38.1%
31 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2009 48/49 9.1 4.9 60.2% 77.6% 53.0% 65.4% 44.8% 67.7% 35.3%
32 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2010 7/7 9.9 4.6 60.9% 72.3% 50.5% 65.2% 38.4% 63.4% 35.1%
33 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2011 19/19 7.8 4.3 59.9% 70.7% 51.7% 60.5% 43.6% 62.9% 34.9%
34 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2012 47/48 6.2 3.4 59.6% 75.7% 53.9% 65.6% 43.9% 66.9% 39.1%
35 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2013 68/71 6.1 3.3 61.3% 74.8% 54.0% 63.0% 41.1% 66.6% 37.8%
36 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2014 25/25 4.6 2.0 63.7% 72.2% 53.8% 56.5% 49.5% 65.3% 36.9%
37 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2015 11/11 4.0 4.7 62.5% 70.1% 50.4% 52.3% 31.9% 62.8% 31.0%
39 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2017 20/20 4.8 4.1 61.9% 68.9% 54.0% 61.4% 29.9% 63.1% 31.7%
Career — 314/318 9.3 2.7 61.5% 76.0% 53.0% 59.0% 41.5% 67.0% 37.2% — 805/873 6.9 3.9 58.7% 74.7% 52.5% 60.6% 42.7% 65.5% 37.5%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Mario Ancic Tommy Haas
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
18 2002 1531 113.3 -1.58 +0.50 0.955 48.9% -13 — +101 37.5% -0.50 2–2 (50%) 2–2 (50%) — +0.28 1996 1588 144.9 +0.04 +2.74 1.057 51.8% +30 — — 58.8% +0.77 0–1 2–0 — -0.78
19 2003 1622 126.7 +0.21 +0.64 1.003 50.1% -36 -40 -47 46.1% -0.20 6–9 (40%) 8–12 (40%) — -0.08 1997 1723 139.6 +1.11 +0.51 1.027 50.7% -2 -80 -102 54.9% +0.37 9–8 (53%) 4–2 (67%) — +0.37
20 2004 1725 141.5 +4.07 +1.16 1.178 52.4% -136 -28 +99 54.0% +0.48 6–9 (40%) 7–17 (29%) — -1.51 1998 1821 150.9 +0.55 +1.94 1.010 50.5% -13 -133 -149 51.4% +0.19 10–6 (63%) 10–9 (53%) — -2.69
21 2005 1799 152.9 +5.24 +0.79 1.202 53.0% -15 -42 +132 64.8% +1.01 5–11 (31%) 18–11 (62%) — +2.76 1999 1833 148.8 +1.86 -1.09 1.003 50.2% +21 -62 -115 60.7% +0.62 13–7 (65%) 20–19 (51%) — +0.33
22 2006 1954 149.4 +4.79 +0.38 1.138 52.3% -48 -50 +88 64.1% +0.94 21–2 (91%) 19–14 (58%) — +1.74 2000 1814 145.1 +1.31 -0.68 0.983 49.9% +30 -33 -96 53.0% +0.31 14–3 (82%) 9–10 (47%) — -0.61
23 2007 1882 144.6 +3.39 -0.07 1.107 51.5% -14 — — 60.0% +0.82 2–3 (40%) 2–4 (33%) — +0.28 2001 2012 160.6 +4.03 +2.88 1.170 52.7% +26 -246 -364 67.6% +1.30 17–3 (85%) 13–18 (42%) — -1.10
24 2008 1925 152.1 +4.71 +1.41 1.150 52.1% -36 -23 +173 58.0% +0.59 9–4 (69%) 11–11 (50%) — -4.16 2002 1863 149.4 +3.04 +0.31 1.074 51.4% +35 +17 — 62.0% +0.66 19–7 (73%) 17–11 (61%) — +1.60
25 2009 1918 145.3 +2.66 +1.24 1.114 51.2% +12 — — 55.3% +0.45 6–0 (100%) 4–4 (50%) — -0.19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
26 2010 1877 117.6 -1.67 -1.63 0.746 45.6% +37 — — 33.3% -0.83 2–0 1–1 — -0.31 2004 1917 153.9 +3.05 +2.94 1.143 52.4% +36 -67 -248 60.3% +0.68 10–5 (67%) 9–10 (47%) — -2.50
27 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2005 1767 138.3 +1.76 +0.90 1.088 51.1% +34 +44 -63 58.6% +0.48 4–8 (33%) 14–5 (74%) — +0.64
28 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2006 1892 153.4 +4.99 +1.83 1.194 52.7% +57 -145 -124 69.5% +1.12 13–8 (62%) 17–10 (63%) — +0.81
29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2007 1894 152.7 +4.56 +2.83 1.249 53.6% +31 -196 -35 65.2% +1.02 8–6 (57%) 11–6 (65%) — +2.11
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2008 1858 140.5 +1.47 +1.79 1.068 51.1% +30 — +20 54.8% +0.26 8–7 (53%) 6–7 (46%) — -0.96
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2009 1941 151.0 +3.54 -0.13 1.093 51.7% -108 -141 +173 61.2% +0.76 10–6 (63%) 15–13 (54%) — -1.53
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2010 1866 115.9 -0.81 -0.45 0.960 49.6% -85 — — 45.5% -0.05 1–1 1–3 (25%) — +0.43
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2011 1772 128.1 -0.01 -0.99 0.941 48.9% +11 — +215 45.1% -0.23 2–4 (33%) 8–6 (57%) — +1.11
34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2012 1975 163.7 +4.25 +2.56 1.182 52.7% -70 -48 +106 61.9% +0.71 7–7 (50%) 11–5 (69%) — -1.93
35 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2013 2024 167.7 +3.58 +2.30 1.133 52.1% -25 +9 +118 65.3% +0.87 13–8 (62%) 16–10 (62%) — -1.12
36 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2014 1911 147.8 +1.08 +0.76 1.066 51.1% +26 +47 — 58.8% +0.77 7–2 (78%) 5–2 (71%) — +1.30
37 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2015 1788 121.7 -0.85 -1.47 0.835 47.3% +57 — +212 32.3% -1.23 0–3 (0%) 4–3 (57%) — -0.82
39 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2017 1689 129.1 -1.47 -2.29 0.859 47.7% +75 +108 +206 36.0% -0.80 5–5 (50%) 6–3 (67%) — -0.60
Career — 2019 150.9 +3.80 +0.75 1.125 51.9% -37 -37 +105 57.8% +0.60 59–40 (60%) 72–76 (49%) 106.1 -0.38 — 2117 158.2 +2.62 +1.22 1.087 51.5% +10 -44 +3 59.5% +0.62 170–105 (62%) 198–152 (57%) 109.2 -0.69

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.