Mario Ancic
all rivalries →| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Roger Federer | 1 | 6 | 7 | Jul 3, 2008 | H2H |
| Ivan Ljubicic | 1 | 5 | 6 | Mar 15, 2009 | H2H |
| Nikolay Davydenko | 2 | 4 | 6 | May 8, 2008 | H2H |
| Dominik Hrbaty | 5 | 1 | 6 | Jan 21, 2007 | H2H |
| Rafael Nadal | 1 | 4 | 5 | Mar 16, 2010 | H2H |
H2H data updated: 2026-09-04 00:00 UTC
Mario Ancic holds a 1–0 lead over Yevgeny Kafelnikov in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Mario Ancic leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Mario Ancic won the 2002 Indianapolis round of 32 4-6 6-2 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
| Player | Score | Player | Match Data | Date | Round | Tournament | Category | Surface |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mario Ancic | 4-6 6-2 6-4 | Yevgeny Kafelnikov | Match data | Aug 15, 2002* | R32 | Indianapolis | ATP International Series Gold → modern equivalent ATP 500 | Hard |
Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | Olympics | 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories | Finals | 500 including documented historical predecessor categories | 250 including documented historical predecessor categories | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mario Ancic | #475 | #7 | 2,075 | 2,019 | 193 | 125 | 60.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
| Yevgeny Kafelnikov | #636 | #1 | 3,917 | 2,066 | 574 | 281 | 67.1% | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 19 | 26 |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Mario Ancic | Yevgeny Kafelnikov | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | 2002 | 3–7 | 30.0% | #89 | 1,530 | 0 | 0 | 1992 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #275 | 1,478 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 2003 | 14–18 | 43.8% | #74 | 1,621 | 0 | 0 | 1993 | 10–10 | 50.0% | #102 | 1,588 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2004 | 26–22 | 54.2% | #29 | 1,725 | 0 | 0 | 1994 | 60–27 | 69.0% | #11 | 1,892 | 0 | 3 |
| 21 | 2005 | 42–23 | 64.6% | #21 | 1,799 | 0 | 1 | 1995 | 69–27 | 71.9% | #6 | 1,875 | 0 | 7 |
| 22 | 2006 | 52–18 | 74.3% | #9 | 1,954 | 0 | 3 | 1996 | 73–25 | 74.5% | #3 | 1,973 | 1 | 11 |
| 23 | 2007 | 13–10 | 56.5% | #83 | 1,881 | 0 | 3 | 1997 | 54–26 | 67.5% | #5 | 1,955 | 1 | 14 |
| 24 | 2008 | 29–17 | 63.0% | #36 | 1,925 | 0 | 3 | 1998 | 55–29 | 65.5% | #11 | 1,940 | 1 | 17 |
| 25 | 2009 | 12–7 | 63.2% | #95 | 1,917 | 0 | 3 | 1999 | 59–29 | 67.0% | #2 | 1,918 | 2 | 20 |
| 26 | 2010 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #478 | 1,876 | 0 | 3 | 2000 | 64–31 | 67.4% | #5 | 1,878 | 2 | 22 |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2001 | 64–26 | 71.1% | #4 | 1,979 | 2 | 24 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2002 | 36–23 | 61.0% | #27 | 1,809 | 2 | 26 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2003 | 29–24 | 54.7% | #41 | 1,708 | 2 | 26 |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.
| Age | Mario Ancic | Yevgeny Kafelnikov | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | Carpet | Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | Carpet | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | |||
| 18 | 2002 | 2 | 5 | 7 | 28.6% | — | — | — | — | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | — | — | — | — | 1992 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% |
| 19 | 2003 | 9 | 13 | 22 | 40.9% | 3 | 2 | 5 | 60.0% | 2 | 3 | 5 | 40.0% | — | — | — | — | 1993 | 3 | 3 | 6 | 50.0% | 4 | 4 | 8 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | 3 | 3 | 6 | 50.0% |
| 20 | 2004 | 6 | 10 | 16 | 37.5% | 6 | 5 | 11 | 54.5% | 10 | 3 | 13 | 76.9% | 4 | 4 | 8 | 50.0% | 1994 | 20 | 8 | 28 | 71.4% | 17 | 9 | 26 | 65.4% | 5 | 2 | 7 | 71.4% | 18 | 8 | 26 | 69.2% |
| 21 | 2005 | 24 | 13 | 37 | 64.9% | 6 | 5 | 11 | 54.5% | 9 | 2 | 11 | 81.8% | 3 | 3 | 6 | 50.0% | 1995 | 19 | 7 | 26 | 73.1% | 18 | 7 | 25 | 72.0% | 6 | 2 | 8 | 75.0% | 26 | 11 | 37 | 70.3% |
| 22 | 2006 | 24 | 11 | 35 | 68.6% | 11 | 4 | 15 | 73.3% | 9 | 1 | 10 | 90.0% | 8 | 2 | 10 | 80.0% | 1996 | 16 | 5 | 21 | 76.2% | 24 | 7 | 31 | 77.4% | 4 | 2 | 6 | 66.7% | 29 | 11 | 40 | 72.5% |
| 23 | 2007 | 12 | 9 | 21 | 57.1% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | 1997 | 17 | 8 | 25 | 68.0% | 14 | 11 | 25 | 56.0% | 8 | 1 | 9 | 88.9% | 15 | 6 | 21 | 71.4% |
| 24 | 2008 | 15 | 9 | 24 | 62.5% | 6 | 5 | 11 | 54.5% | 8 | 3 | 11 | 72.7% | — | — | — | — | 1998 | 28 | 14 | 42 | 66.7% | 8 | 9 | 17 | 47.1% | 5 | 2 | 7 | 71.4% | 14 | 4 | 18 | 77.8% |
| 25 | 2009 | 12 | 6 | 18 | 66.7% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1999 | 32 | 15 | 47 | 68.1% | 9 | 8 | 17 | 52.9% | 2 | 2 | 4 | 50.0% | 16 | 4 | 20 | 80.0% |
| 26 | 2010 | 2 | 2 | 4 | 50.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2000 | 44 | 19 | 63 | 69.8% | 10 | 9 | 19 | 52.6% | 4 | 2 | 6 | 66.7% | 6 | 1 | 7 | 85.7% |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2001 | 39 | 15 | 54 | 72.2% | 8 | 7 | 15 | 53.3% | 5 | 2 | 7 | 71.4% | 12 | 2 | 14 | 85.7% |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2002 | 22 | 13 | 35 | 62.9% | 2 | 6 | 8 | 25.0% | 7 | 1 | 8 | 87.5% | 5 | 3 | 8 | 62.5% |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2003 | 13 | 14 | 27 | 48.1% | 11 | 5 | 16 | 68.8% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | 5 | 3 | 8 | 62.5% |
| Career | — | 106 | 78 | 184 | 57.6% | 32 | 23 | 55 | 58.2% | 39 | 14 | 53 | 73.6% | 16 | 10 | 26 | 61.5% | — | 253 | 123 | 376 | 67.3% | 125 | 83 | 208 | 60.1% | 46 | 18 | 64 | 71.9% | 150 | 57 | 207 | 72.5% |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 314/318 of Mario Ancic's and 719/855 of Yevgeny Kafelnikov's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.
| Age | Mario Ancic | Yevgeny Kafelnikov | ||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Sample | Aces/M | DFs/M | 1st Sv% | 1st Pts% | 2nd Pts% | BP Saved% | BP Conv% | Svc Pts% | Ret Pts% | Yr | Sample | Aces/M | DFs/M | 1st Sv% | 1st Pts% | 2nd Pts% | BP Saved% | BP Conv% | Svc Pts% | Ret Pts% | |
| 18 | 2002 | 8/10 | 7.0 | 6.0 | 49.1% | 75.0% | 44.7% | 54.2% | 29.0% | 59.8% | 38.4% | 1992 | 3/5 | 3.7 | 3.0 | 59.4% | 71.1% | 58.1% | 73.7% | 53.3% | 64.4% | 30.9% |
| 19 | 2003 | 32/32 | 8.4 | 4.3 | 57.9% | 72.2% | 51.0% | 55.3% | 38.5% | 63.0% | 37.1% | 1993 | 18/20 | 2.8 | 3.6 | 56.1% | 69.4% | 49.2% | 54.1% | 54.0% | 60.2% | 39.1% |
| 20 | 2004 | 47/48 | 9.5 | 3.2 | 62.3% | 75.9% | 55.0% | 45.1% | 40.3% | 67.8% | 37.9% | 1994 | 76/87 | 3.8 | 3.2 | 57.2% | 71.2% | 51.7% | 57.9% | 46.3% | 62.5% | 41.7% |
| 21 | 2005 | 65/65 | 11.3 | 2.8 | 61.8% | 79.5% | 52.0% | 62.9% | 46.7% | 68.9% | 37.4% | 1995 | 81/96 | 5.6 | 3.5 | 54.9% | 75.0% | 51.8% | 62.4% | 47.8% | 64.5% | 41.4% |
| 22 | 2006 | 70/70 | 9.1 | 2.0 | 62.7% | 75.5% | 53.5% | 64.7% | 44.0% | 67.2% | 37.3% | 1996 | 88/98 | 6.4 | 3.6 | 56.7% | 75.7% | 52.7% | 59.4% | 48.0% | 65.8% | 40.6% |
| 23 | 2007 | 23/23 | 8.3 | 1.7 | 63.5% | 76.8% | 53.0% | 56.1% | 42.7% | 68.0% | 35.4% | 1997 | 67/80 | 5.3 | 4.2 | 55.4% | 72.2% | 51.1% | 54.6% | 42.3% | 62.8% | 40.4% |
| 24 | 2008 | 45/46 | 9.2 | 2.3 | 62.9% | 76.3% | 53.6% | 64.5% | 39.8% | 67.7% | 37.1% | 1998 | 62/84 | 5.7 | 4.3 | 54.3% | 75.2% | 50.3% | 60.0% | 48.9% | 63.9% | 39.4% |
| 25 | 2009 | 19/19 | 7.6 | 1.3 | 60.0% | 73.0% | 57.8% | 59.9% | 30.8% | 66.6% | 37.2% | 1999 | 69/88 | 6.2 | 4.3 | 56.4% | 73.2% | 51.5% | 60.1% | 46.3% | 63.6% | 39.8% |
| 26 | 2010 | 5/5 | 8.0 | 2.6 | 59.8% | 69.0% | 42.0% | 50.6% | 42.4% | 58.0% | 31.3% | 2000 | 75/95 | 5.1 | 4.2 | 54.8% | 73.1% | 50.2% | 62.7% | 47.1% | 62.7% | 40.3% |
| 27 | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2001 | 74/90 | 6.9 | 5.1 | 51.5% | 75.6% | 51.5% | 57.7% | 44.7% | 63.9% | 39.6% |
| 28 | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2002 | 54/59 | 6.9 | 4.9 | 53.5% | 75.1% | 50.8% | 61.4% | 49.3% | 63.5% | 38.0% |
| 29 | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2003 | 52/53 | 4.0 | 3.3 | 58.9% | 70.3% | 50.2% | 50.1% | 43.0% | 61.8% | 41.9% |
| Career | — | 314/318 | 9.3 | 2.7 | 61.5% | 76.0% | 53.0% | 59.0% | 41.5% | 67.0% | 37.2% | — | 719/855 | 5.5 | 4.0 | 55.4% | 73.7% | 51.3% | 58.8% | 46.6% | 63.5% | 40.3% |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.
| Age | Mario Ancic | Yevgeny Kafelnikov | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | |
| 18 | 2002 | 1531 | 113.3 | -1.58 | +0.50 | 0.955 | 48.9% | -13 | — | +101 | 37.5% | -0.50 | 2–2 (50%) | 2–2 (50%) | 102.2 | +0.28 | 1992 | 1479 | 99.3 | +0.60 | -2.03 | 0.869 | 48.8% | +51 | — | — | 27.3% | -2.00 | 0–1 | 2–1 (67%) | — | +0.33 |
| 19 | 2003 | 1622 | 126.7 | +0.21 | +0.64 | 1.003 | 50.1% | -36 | -40 | -47 | 46.1% | -0.20 | 6–9 (40%) | 8–12 (40%) | 98.1 | -0.08 | 1993 | 1589 | 133.8 | +0.39 | +0.53 | 0.982 | 49.7% | +14 | -35 | — | 48.9% | -0.16 | 2–3 (40%) | 4–4 (50%) | 102.5 | +0.26 |
| 20 | 2004 | 1725 | 141.5 | +4.07 | +1.16 | 1.178 | 52.4% | -136 | -28 | +99 | 54.0% | +0.48 | 6–9 (40%) | 7–17 (29%) | 93.6 | -1.51 | 1994 | 1892 | 156.2 | +1.00 | +3.73 | 1.111 | 51.9% | -7 | -63 | -215 | 63.0% | +0.80 | 21–10 (68%) | 21–16 (57%) | 111.8 | -1.63 |
| 21 | 2005 | 1799 | 152.9 | +5.24 | +0.79 | 1.202 | 53.0% | -15 | -42 | +132 | 64.8% | +1.01 | 5–11 (31%) | 18–11 (62%) | 98.9 | +2.76 | 1995 | 1875 | 159.1 | +2.58 | +3.80 | 1.168 | 53.0% | -9 | +119 | -106 | 66.1% | +1.26 | 17–7 (71%) | 12–19 (39%) | 98.7 | -1.60 |
| 22 | 2006 | 1954 | 149.4 | +4.79 | +0.38 | 1.138 | 52.3% | -48 | -50 | +88 | 64.1% | +0.94 | 21–2 (91%) | 19–14 (58%) | 115.9 | +1.74 | 1996 | 1974 | 160.3 | +3.62 | +3.09 | 1.188 | 52.9% | +5 | +107 | -186 | 67.1% | +0.96 | 27–12 (69%) | 26–14 (65%) | 109.5 | -0.87 |
| 23 | 2007 | 1882 | 144.6 | +3.39 | -0.07 | 1.107 | 51.5% | -14 | — | — | 60.0% | +0.82 | 2–3 (40%) | 2–4 (33%) | 98.7 | +0.28 | 1997 | 1955 | 155.4 | +0.99 | +3.11 | 1.085 | 51.5% | +30 | -25 | -49 | 63.0% | +0.72 | 15–8 (65%) | 25–12 (68%) | 106.6 | -0.15 |
| 24 | 2008 | 1925 | 152.1 | +4.71 | +1.41 | 1.150 | 52.1% | -36 | -23 | +173 | 58.0% | +0.59 | 9–4 (69%) | 11–11 (50%) | 102.1 | -4.16 | 1998 | 1941 | 155.9 | +1.92 | +2.31 | 1.089 | 51.6% | +25 | -133 | -57 | 58.7% | +0.51 | 21–8 (72%) | 17–12 (59%) | 105.2 | -0.64 |
| 25 | 2009 | 1918 | 145.3 | +2.66 | +1.24 | 1.114 | 51.2% | +12 | — | — | 55.3% | +0.45 | 6–0 (100%) | 4–4 (50%) | 104.4 | -0.19 | 1999 | 1919 | 158.7 | +1.95 | +2.68 | 1.093 | 51.7% | +38 | -109 | -76 | 62.4% | +0.68 | 19–14 (58%) | 25–18 (58%) | 98.7 | -0.99 |
| 26 | 2010 | 1877 | 117.6 | -1.67 | -1.63 | 0.746 | 45.6% | +37 | — | — | 33.3% | -0.83 | 2–0 | 1–1 | — | -0.31 | 2000 | 1879 | 149.9 | +0.67 | +2.46 | 1.080 | 51.7% | +34 | -58 | -45 | 61.0% | +0.64 | 20–8 (71%) | 21–16 (57%) | 105.6 | +2.19 |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2001 | 1979 | 154.8 | +2.10 | +1.93 | 1.098 | 52.0% | +21 | -174 | -153 | 64.8% | +0.86 | 18–10 (64%) | 26–18 (59%) | 100.8 | +1.22 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2002 | 1809 | 140.7 | +1.24 | +0.76 | 1.042 | 51.0% | +44 | -93 | +62 | 56.6% | +0.27 | 11–6 (65%) | 18–16 (53%) | 98.7 | +2.29 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2003 | 1708 | 143.0 | -0.71 | +4.01 | 1.099 | 51.7% | +33 | +98 | — | 56.3% | +0.48 | 10–11 (48%) | 9–8 (53%) | 98.9 | +1.32 |
| Career | — | 2019 | 150.9 | +3.80 | +0.75 | 1.125 | 51.9% | -37 | -37 | +105 | 57.8% | +0.60 | 59–40 (60%) | 72–76 (49%) | 106.1 | -0.38 | — | 2066 | 158.0 | +1.62 | +2.75 | 1.105 | 51.9% | +21 | -16 | -88 | 62.0% | +0.72 | 181–98 (65%) | 206–154 (57%) | 107.5 | +0.20 |
Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.
| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Roger Federer | 1 | 6 | 7 | Jul 3, 2008 | H2H |
| Ivan Ljubicic | 1 | 5 | 6 | Mar 15, 2009 | H2H |
| Nikolay Davydenko | 2 | 4 | 6 | May 8, 2008 | H2H |
| Dominik Hrbaty | 5 | 1 | 6 | Jan 21, 2007 | H2H |
| Rafael Nadal | 1 | 4 | 5 | Mar 16, 2010 | H2H |
| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Daniel Vacek | 15 | 4 | 19 | Jan 3, 2002 | H2H |
| Marc Rosset | 5 | 10 | 15 | Feb 16, 2002 | H2H |
| Nicolas Kiefer | 8 | 6 | 14 | Oct 23, 2003 | H2H |
| Goran Ivanisevic | 5 | 9 | 14 | Nov 12, 2001 | H2H |
| Thomas Enqvist | 7 | 6 | 13 | Oct 15, 2003 | H2H |