H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Mark Cox vs Bob Hewitt H2H: 3-2
Mark Cox holds a 3–2 lead over Bob Hewitt in their ATP head-to-head. Across 5 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on carpet, while they are tied 1–1 on hard courts. Most recently, Mark Cox won the 1974 Johannesburg third round 7-5 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
GBR
Age 83
Left-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H
3
–
2
5 main draw meetings
RSA
Age 86
Right-Handed
190 cm / 6'3"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 27, 1974* | Johannesburg | ATP 250 | R32 | Hard | Mark Cox | 7-5 6-2 | Bob Hewitt | Match data |
| May 2, 1970* | Bournemouth | ATP 250 | F | Clay | Mark Cox | 6-1 6-2 6-3 | Bob Hewitt | Match data |
| Nov 19, 1969* | London (4) | ATP 250 | F | Carpet | Mark Cox | 4-6 9-7 6-2 | Bob Hewitt | Match data |
| Nov 16, 1968* | London 2 | ATP 250 | QF | Hard | Bob Hewitt | 6-3 8-10 7-5 4-6 6-3 | Mark Cox | Match data |
| Nov 2, 1968* | Aberavon | ATP 250 | SF | Carpet | Bob Hewitt | 3-6 6-3 7-5 | Mark Cox | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mark Cox | #486 | #12 | 0 | 2,009 | 408 | 274 | 59.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 15 | 15 |
| Bob Hewitt | #669 | #32 | 0 | 2,005 | 285 | 178 | 61.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 11 | 11 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Mark Cox | Bob Hewitt | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 24 | 1968 | 52–23 | 69.3% | — | 1,722 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 25 | 1969 | 35–16 | 68.6% | — | 1,836 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 26 | 1970 | 39–31 | 55.7% | — | 1,796 | 0 | 5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 1971 | 27–31 | 46.6% | — | 1,815 | 0 | 5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 1972 | 43–29 | 59.7% | — | 1,871 | 0 | 7 | 1968 | 51–15 | 77.3% | — | 1,820 | 0 | 2 |
| 29 | 1973 | 56–28 | 66.7% | #22 | 1,890 | 0 | 10 | 1969 | 31–11 | 73.8% | — | 1,856 | 0 | 4 |
| 30 | 1974 | 25–17 | 59.5% | #30 | 1,828 | 0 | 10 | 1970 | 41–16 | 71.9% | — | 1,822 | 0 | 5 |
| 31 | 1975 | 31–13 | 70.5% | #25 | 1,915 | 0 | 13 | 1971 | 22–10 | 68.8% | — | 1,821 | 0 | 6 |
| 32 | 1976 | 22–15 | 59.5% | #17 | 1,954 | 0 | 14 | 1972 | 52–16 | 76.5% | — | 1,902 | 0 | 11 |
| 33 | 1977 | 35–21 | 62.5% | #26 | 1,823 | 0 | 15 | 1973 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #157 | 1,855 | 0 | 11 |
| 34 | 1978 | 15–16 | 48.4% | #68 | 1,765 | 0 | 15 | 1974 | 13–17 | 43.3% | #59 | 1,715 | 0 | 11 |
| 35 | 1979 | 17–16 | 51.5% | #76 | 1,786 | 0 | 15 | 1975 | 27–16 | 62.8% | #34 | 1,847 | 0 | 11 |
| 36 | 1980 | 11–13 | 45.8% | #140 | 1,673 | 0 | 15 | 1976 | 11–22 | 33.3% | #83 | 1,666 | 0 | 11 |
| 37 | 1981 | 0–5 | 0.0% | #140 | 1,597 | 0 | 15 | 1977 | 29–25 | 53.7% | #56 | 1,725 | 0 | 11 |
| 38 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1978 | 6–21 | 22.2% | #206 | 1,596 | 0 | 11 |
| 39 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1979 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #546 | 1,547 | 0 | 11 |
| 40 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1980 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,544 | 0 | 11 |