H2H data updated: 2026-09-03 00:00 UTC

Mark Cox vs Bob Lutz H2H: 7-3

Mark Cox holds a 7–3 lead over Bob Lutz in their ATP head-to-head. Across 10 main-draw meetings, Mark Cox leads 4–2 on hard courts and 2–0 on carpet. Most recently, Bob Lutz won the 1980 South African Open round of 32 4-6 6-1 6-3.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Mark Cox
GBR Age 83 Left-Handed 185 cm / 6'1"
H2H
7 – 3
10 main draw meetings
Bob Lutz
USA Age 79 Right-Handed 180 cm / 5'11"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Bob Lutz 4-6 6-1 6-3 Mark Cox Match data Nov 28, 1980* R32 South African Open ATP 250 Hard
Mark Cox 6-4 6-4 Bob Lutz Match data Feb 20, 1975* R32 Fort Worth Wct ATP 250 Hard
Mark Cox 6-3 6-1 Bob Lutz Match data Jan 25, 1974* R16 Philadelphia Wct ATP 250 Carpet
Bob Lutz 6-2 3-6 7-5 Mark Cox Match data Aug 25, 1971* R32 Fort Worth Wct ATP 250 Hard
Mark Cox 6-2 6-1 Bob Lutz Match data Aug 13, 1971* R32 Canadian Open ATP 250 Clay
Bob Lutz 6-2 6-1 6-2 Mark Cox Match data Mar 18, 1971* QF Australian Open Grand Slam Grass
Mark Cox 6-3 6-7 6-4 Bob Lutz Match data Aug 12, 1970* R32 U.S. Pro Tennis Championships ATP 250 Hard
Mark Cox 4-6 6-4 6-4 Bob Lutz Match data Feb 14, 1969* R16 Salisbury ATP 250 Hard
Mark Cox 6-4 6-4 Bob Lutz Match data Nov 26, 1968* SF London 3 ATP 250 Hard
Mark Cox 6-4 2-6 7-5 Bob Lutz Match data Feb 16, 1968* F Pittsburgh Indoors ATP 250 Carpet

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Mark Cox #486 #12 0 2,023 406 272 59.9% 0 0 0 0 13 13
Bob Lutz — — — 2,053 388 272 58.8% 0 0 0 0 11 11

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Mark Cox Bob Lutz
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
20 — — — — — — — 1968 23–15 60.5% — 1,707 0 0
21 — — — — — — — 1969 24–16 60.0% — 1,845 0 0
22 — — — — — — — 1970 23–18 56.1% — 1,855 0 2
23 — — — — — — — 1971 45–25 64.3% — 1,992 0 4
24 1968 52–23 69.3% — 1,715 0 0 1972 36–29 55.4% — 1,912 0 5
25 1969 35–16 68.6% — 1,838 0 2 1973 16–14 53.3% — 1,841 0 5
26 1970 39–31 55.7% — 1,800 0 3 1974 15–18 45.5% — 1,745 0 5
27 1971 27–31 46.6% — 1,819 0 3 1975 36–19 65.5% — 1,875 0 6
28 1972 43–29 59.7% — 1,874 0 5 1976 27–17 61.4% — 1,926 0 6
29 1973 56–28 66.7% #22 1,894 0 8 1977 36–22 62.1% — 1,833 0 6
30 1974 24–16 60.0% #30 1,833 0 8 1978 28–16 63.6% — 1,917 0 7
31 1975 30–12 71.4% #25 1,934 0 11 1979 23–13 63.9% — 1,889 0 8
32 1976 22–15 59.5% #17 1,965 0 12 1980 33–17 66.0% — 1,952 0 11
33 1977 35–21 62.5% #26 1,828 0 13 1981 10–13 43.5% — 1,788 0 11
34 1978 15–16 48.4% #68 1,769 0 13 1982 6–15 28.6% — 1,698 0 11
35 1979 17–16 51.5% #76 1,789 0 13 1983 3–3 50.0% — 1,698 0 11
36 1980 11–13 45.8% #140 1,675 0 13 1984 3–1 75.0% — 1,740 0 11
37 1981 0–5 0.0% — 1,599 0 13 1985 1–1 50.0% — 1,742 0 11

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Mark Cox Bob Lutz
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
20 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1968 9 8 17 52.9% 3 2 5 60.0% 10 4 14 71.4% 1 1 2 50.0%
21 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1969 9 5 14 64.3% 2 4 6 33.3% 13 6 19 68.4% 0 1 1 0.0%
22 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1970 12 11 23 52.2% — — — — 10 5 15 66.7% 1 2 3 33.3%
23 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1971 13 7 20 65.0% 9 6 15 60.0% 10 5 15 66.7% 13 7 20 65.0%
24 1968 24 11 35 68.6% 18 8 26 69.2% 6 2 8 75.0% 4 2 6 66.7% 1972 6 7 13 46.2% 5 5 10 50.0% 3 1 4 75.0% 22 16 38 57.9%
25 1969 11 5 16 68.8% 12 6 18 66.7% 4 2 6 66.7% 8 3 11 72.7% 1973 6 4 10 60.0% 0 3 3 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 10 6 16 62.5%
26 1970 10 9 19 52.6% 14 6 20 70.0% 12 9 21 57.1% 3 7 10 30.0% 1974 5 5 10 50.0% 5 7 12 41.7% 1 3 4 25.0% 4 3 7 57.1%
27 1971 9 11 20 45.0% 8 7 15 53.3% 5 6 11 45.5% 5 7 12 41.7% 1975 15 8 23 65.2% 4 4 8 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 17 6 23 73.9%
28 1972 14 9 23 60.9% 8 5 13 61.5% 2 1 3 66.7% 19 14 33 57.6% 1976 5 3 8 62.5% 8 5 13 61.5% 3 2 5 60.0% 11 7 18 61.1%
29 1973 11 4 15 73.3% 10 11 21 47.6% 10 2 12 83.3% 25 11 36 69.4% 1977 9 9 18 50.0% 11 7 18 61.1% 7 2 9 77.8% 9 4 13 69.2%
30 1974 8 4 12 66.7% 1 2 3 33.3% 2 2 4 50.0% 13 8 21 61.9% 1978 14 5 19 73.7% 4 1 5 80.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 10 8 18 55.6%
31 1975 3 2 5 60.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 2 1 3 66.7% 22 6 28 78.6% 1979 5 4 9 55.6% 1 1 2 50.0% 8 3 11 72.7% 9 5 14 64.3%
32 1976 9 2 11 81.8% 5 4 9 55.6% 2 2 4 50.0% 6 7 13 46.2% 1980 22 8 30 73.3% 1 0 1 100.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 9 6 15 60.0%
33 1977 8 8 16 50.0% 5 5 10 50.0% 8 2 10 80.0% 14 6 20 70.0% 1981 7 8 15 46.7% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% 2 4 6 33.3%
34 1978 5 4 9 55.6% 2 1 3 66.7% 1 2 3 33.3% 7 9 16 43.8% 1982 3 7 10 30.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 1 1 2 50.0% 1 5 6 16.7%
35 1979 9 8 17 52.9% 1 2 3 33.3% 4 3 7 57.1% 3 3 6 50.0% 1983 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — 2 1 3 66.7%
36 1980 5 5 10 50.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 1984 3 1 4 75.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
37 1981 0 1 1 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 1985 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 126 83 209 60.3% 89 65 154 57.8% 60 38 98 61.2% 131 86 217 60.4% — 145 103 248 58.5% 54 47 101 53.5% 68 40 108 63.0% 121 82 203 59.6%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Mark Cox Bob Lutz
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
20 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1968 1708 127.8 — — — — -52 -164 +67 59.8% +0.80 4–5 (44%) — — -2.16
21 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1969 1846 130.9 — — — — -50 -320 +54 53.3% +0.29 10–3 (77%) — — -1.31
22 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1970 1855 135.8 — — — — -25 — +52 56.6% +0.49 4–8 (33%) 2–1 (67%) — -0.30
23 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1971 1992 148.4 — — — — +23 -288 -66 59.7% +0.74 12–8 (60%) 9–10 (47%) — -4.07
24 1968 1715 125.1 — — — — +101 -20 -76 64.9% +1.14 9–9 (50%) — — +2.87 1972 1913 151.7 — — — — +8 -156 +37 56.2% +0.37 12–14 (46%) 10–10 (50%) — -4.12
25 1969 1839 129.2 — — — — +75 -68 -126 60.3% +0.67 12–5 (71%) — — +4.09 1973 1841 135.1 — — — — +30 — — 57.1% +0.44 6–6 (50%) 4–5 (44%) — -1.03
26 1970 1800 135.6 — — — — -58 +55 +20 55.8% +0.34 9–10 (47%) 2–6 (25%) — -1.59 1974 1745 137.0 — — — — +68 -31 +144 42.5% -0.23 3–4 (43%) 7–9 (44%) — -2.71
27 1971 1819 144.9 — — — — -45 +46 -3 47.1% -0.09 6–6 (50%) 13–13 (50%) — -7.37 1975 1875 152.4 — — — — +83 -147 — 63.6% +1.08 7–4 (64%) 4–6 (40%) — -0.90
28 1972 1874 146.7 — — — — -12 +65 -36 56.3% +0.44 18–12 (60%) 15–11 (58%) — -2.93 1976 1926 158.4 — — — — +60 -149 -54 56.3% +0.54 11–7 (61%) 6–7 (46%) — -4.63
29 1973 1894 146.3 — — — — +68 -87 +21 61.9% +0.79 18–9 (67%) 14–12 (54%) — -0.98 1977 1833 152.1 — — — — +43 -24 +83 58.8% +0.77 11–5 (69%) 7–10 (41%) — -3.05
30 1974 1833 142.2 — — — — +74 -51 +60 60.8% +0.62 3–7 (30%) 14–9 (61%) — -0.76 1978 1917 150.2 — — — — +30 -70 — 61.5% +0.80 8–5 (62%) 7–7 (50%) — -2.30
31 1975 1934 154.1 — — — — +99 -157 -28 66.7% +1.39 6–3 (67%) 4–6 (40%) — -0.83 1979 1890 140.1 — — — — +29 — -26 63.9% +1.27 3–4 (43%) 4–6 (40%) — +0.36
32 1976 1965 146.6 — — — — +85 -198 -95 52.6% -0.01 12–4 (75%) 8–6 (57%) — -3.40 1980 1952 152.7 — — — — +46 — -133 61.7% +0.71 9–7 (56%) 8–6 (57%) — -2.36
33 1977 1828 146.3 — — — — +95 -114 +115 57.0% +0.45 11–3 (79%) 7–11 (39%) — -0.20 1981 1789 132.9 — — — — +6 — — 47.3% -0.27 3–5 (38%) 4–3 (57%) — -1.03
34 1978 1770 142.4 — — — — +56 -48 +123 50.0% +0.15 3–5 (38%) 5–1 (83%) — -1.06 1982 1698 127.1 — — — — +10 +75 — 31.4% -1.04 1–2 (33%) 1–5 (17%) — -1.57
35 1979 1790 141.2 — — — — +18 -86 +110 53.0% +0.22 3–6 (33%) 6–6 (50%) — -1.30 1983 1698 117.4 — — — — +8 — — 53.8% +0.46 1–0 0–1 — +0.55
36 1980 1676 120.6 — — — — +49 -18 +194 46.8% -0.26 4–4 (50%) 7–6 (54%) — +1.71 1984 1740 119.9 — — — — +6 — — 66.7% +0.44 1–0 1–0 — -0.67
37 1981 1599 106.1 — — — — — — — 21.4% -1.79 0–2 1–1 — -0.05 1985 1742 103.0 — — — — — — — 50.0% -1.25 — 1–0 — -0.35
Career — 2023 146.1 — — — — +46 -36 +21 57.2% +0.50 114–85 (57%) 96–88 (52%) 101.1 -1.75 — 2053 152.2 — — — — +26 -133 +21 56.9% +0.55 106–87 (55%) 75–86 (47%) 96.1 -4.86

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.