H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Mark Cox vs Buster C Mottram H2H: 1-0
Mark Cox holds a 1–0 lead over Buster C Mottram in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Mark Cox leads 1–0 on carpet. Most recently, Mark Cox won the 1976 Wembley third round 6-4 7-6.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
GBR
Age 83
Left-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
GBR
Right-Handed
193 cm / 6'4"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 18, 1976* | Wembley | ATP 250 | R32 | Carpet | Mark Cox | 6-4 7-6 | Buster C Mottram | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mark Cox | #486 | #12 | 0 | 2,009 | 408 | 274 | 59.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 15 | 15 |
| Buster C Mottram | #735 | #15 | 0 | 1,952 | 270 | 177 | 60.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Mark Cox | Buster C Mottram | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 1968 | 52–23 | 69.3% | — | 1,722 | 0 | 2 | 1970 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,497 | 0 | 0 |
| 1969 | 35–16 | 68.6% | — | 1,836 | 0 | 4 | 1971 | 2–1 | 66.7% | — | 1,536 | 0 | 0 |
| 1970 | 39–31 | 55.7% | — | 1,796 | 0 | 5 | 1972 | 1–2 | 33.3% | — | 1,548 | 0 | 0 |
| 1971 | 27–31 | 46.6% | — | 1,815 | 0 | 5 | 1973 | 14–11 | 56.0% | #33 | 1,658 | 0 | 0 |
| 1972 | 43–29 | 59.7% | — | 1,871 | 0 | 7 | 1974 | 14–13 | 51.9% | #55 | 1,767 | 0 | 0 |
| 1973 | 56–28 | 66.7% | #22 | 1,890 | 0 | 10 | 1975 | 26–15 | 63.4% | #34 | 1,897 | 0 | 2 |
| 1974 | 25–17 | 59.5% | #30 | 1,828 | 0 | 10 | 1976 | 33–16 | 67.3% | #41 | 1,852 | 0 | 3 |
| 1975 | 31–13 | 70.5% | #25 | 1,915 | 0 | 13 | 1977 | 46–22 | 67.6% | #20 | 1,909 | 0 | 3 |
| 1976 | 22–15 | 59.5% | #17 | 1,954 | 0 | 14 | 1978 | 29–18 | 61.7% | #28 | 1,812 | 0 | 3 |
| 1977 | 35–21 | 62.5% | #26 | 1,823 | 0 | 15 | 1979 | 34–21 | 61.8% | #32 | 1,873 | 0 | 3 |
| 1978 | 15–16 | 48.4% | #68 | 1,765 | 0 | 15 | 1980 | 25–18 | 58.1% | #43 | 1,824 | 0 | 3 |
| 1979 | 17–16 | 51.5% | #76 | 1,786 | 0 | 15 | 1981 | 13–13 | 50.0% | #72 | 1,773 | 0 | 3 |
| 1980 | 11–13 | 45.8% | #140 | 1,673 | 0 | 15 | 1982 | 28–16 | 63.6% | #20 | 1,840 | 0 | 3 |
| 1981 | 0–5 | 0.0% | #140 | 1,597 | 0 | 15 | 1983 | 5–10 | 33.3% | #91 | 1,703 | 0 | 3 |