H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Mark Cox vs Charlie Pasarell H2H: 2-1
Mark Cox holds a 2–1 lead over Charlie Pasarell in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on carpet, while Mark Cox leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Mark Cox won the 1979 Cincinnati second round 6-3 6-1.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
GBR
Age 83
Left-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H
2
–
1
3 main draw meetings
USA
Age 82
Right-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 22, 1979* | Cincinnati | Masters 1000 | R64 | Hard | Mark Cox | 6-3 6-1 | Charlie Pasarell | Match data |
| Mar 20, 1976* | Washington Wct | ATP 250 | QF | Carpet | Charlie Pasarell | 6-3 6-4 | Mark Cox | Match data |
| Nov 19, 1974* | London | ATP 250 | R32 | Carpet | Mark Cox | 7-6 7-6 | Charlie Pasarell | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mark Cox | #486 | #12 | 0 | 2,009 | 408 | 274 | 59.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 15 | 15 |
| Charlie Pasarell | #312 | #35 | 0 | 1,939 | 302 | 275 | 52.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 4 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Mark Cox | Charlie Pasarell | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 24 | 1968 | 52–23 | 69.3% | — | 1,722 | 0 | 2 | 1968 | 38–18 | 67.9% | — | 1,650 | 0 | 1 |
| 25 | 1969 | 35–16 | 68.6% | — | 1,836 | 0 | 4 | 1969 | 43–31 | 58.1% | — | 1,668 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | 1970 | 39–31 | 55.7% | — | 1,796 | 0 | 5 | 1970 | 27–22 | 55.1% | — | 1,749 | 0 | 1 |
| 27 | 1971 | 27–31 | 46.6% | — | 1,815 | 0 | 5 | 1971 | 26–32 | 44.8% | — | 1,801 | 0 | 1 |
| 28 | 1972 | 43–29 | 59.7% | — | 1,871 | 0 | 7 | 1972 | 35–27 | 56.5% | — | 1,840 | 0 | 2 |
| 29 | 1973 | 56–28 | 66.7% | #22 | 1,890 | 0 | 10 | 1973 | 40–31 | 56.3% | #47 | 1,834 | 0 | 3 |
| 30 | 1974 | 25–17 | 59.5% | #30 | 1,828 | 0 | 10 | 1974 | 29–26 | 52.7% | #51 | 1,768 | 0 | 4 |
| 31 | 1975 | 31–13 | 70.5% | #25 | 1,915 | 0 | 13 | 1975 | 22–25 | 46.8% | #63 | 1,715 | 0 | 4 |
| 32 | 1976 | 22–15 | 59.5% | #17 | 1,954 | 0 | 14 | 1976 | 24–25 | 49.0% | #56 | 1,815 | 0 | 4 |
| 33 | 1977 | 35–21 | 62.5% | #26 | 1,823 | 0 | 15 | 1977 | 13–21 | 38.2% | #71 | 1,650 | 0 | 4 |
| 34 | 1978 | 15–16 | 48.4% | #68 | 1,765 | 0 | 15 | 1978 | 4–10 | 28.6% | #200 | 1,607 | 0 | 4 |
| 35 | 1979 | 17–16 | 51.5% | #76 | 1,786 | 0 | 15 | 1979 | 1–7 | 12.5% | #312 | 1,563 | 0 | 4 |
| 36 | 1980 | 11–13 | 45.8% | #140 | 1,673 | 0 | 15 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 37 | 1981 | 0–5 | 0.0% | #140 | 1,597 | 0 | 15 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |