H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC

Mark Cox vs Cliff Richey H2H: 2-7

Cliff Richey holds a 7–2 lead over Mark Cox in their ATP head-to-head. Across 9 main-draw meetings, Cliff Richey leads 5–0 on hard courts, while they are tied 1–1 on carpet. Most recently, Mark Cox won the 1975 Atlanta Wct semifinal 6-2 6-2.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Mark Cox
GBR Age 83 Left-Handed 185 cm / 6'1"
H2H
2 – 7
9 main draw meetings
Cliff Richey
USA Age 79 Right-Handed 175 cm / 5'9"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Mar 29, 1975* Atlanta Wct ATP 250 SF Carpet Mark Cox #51 6-2 6-2 Cliff Richey #20 Match data
Feb 14, 1975* Toronto Indoor Wct ATP 250 R16 Carpet Cliff Richey #25 7-5 4-6 7-6(6) Mark Cox #32 Match data
Jan 19, 1974* Lakeway ATP 250 QF Hard Cliff Richey #19 3-6 6-1 6-4 Mark Cox #22 Match data
Aug 2, 1972* Louisville Wct ATP 250 R16 Clay Mark Cox 6-7 6-3 6-3 Cliff Richey Match data
Apr 28, 1972* Charlotte Wct ATP 250 QF Clay Cliff Richey 1-6 6-3 6-1 Mark Cox Match data
Apr 23, 1971* Charlotte ATP 250 QF Hard Cliff Richey 6-4 6-2 Mark Cox Match data
Mar 2, 1969* Curacao ATP 250 F Hard Cliff Richey 6-4 6-3 6-3 Mark Cox Match data
Jan 31, 1969* Omaha ATP 250 SF Hard Cliff Richey 6-4 6-4 Mark Cox Match data
Feb 16, 1968* Salisbury ATP 250 R16 Hard Cliff Richey 6-4 6-4 Mark Cox Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Mark Cox #486 #12 0 2,009 408 274 59.8% 0 0 0 0 15 15
Cliff Richey #662 #16 0 2,112 488 224 68.5% 0 2 0 0 21 23

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Mark Cox Cliff Richey
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
21 — — — — — — — 1968 46–15 75.4% — 1,750 0 3
22 — — — — — — — 1969 64–18 78.0% — 1,946 0 9
23 — — — — — — — 1970 88–24 78.6% — 2,047 0 14
24 1968 52–23 69.3% — 1,722 0 2 1971 67–23 74.4% — 1,906 0 17
25 1969 35–16 68.6% — 1,836 0 4 1972 54–24 69.2% — 1,956 0 20
26 1970 39–31 55.7% — 1,796 0 5 1973 47–26 64.4% #19 1,848 0 20
27 1971 27–31 46.6% — 1,815 0 5 1974 25–16 61.0% #23 1,891 0 21
28 1972 43–29 59.7% — 1,871 0 7 1975 37–24 60.7% #32 1,855 0 21
29 1973 56–28 66.7% #22 1,890 0 10 1976 33–24 57.9% #28 1,848 0 22
30 1974 25–17 59.5% #30 1,828 0 10 1977 14–17 45.2% #97 1,714 0 22
31 1975 31–13 70.5% #25 1,915 0 13 1978 13–12 52.0% #57 1,705 0 23
32 1976 22–15 59.5% #17 1,954 0 14 1979 0–1 0.0% #662 1,693 0 23
33 1977 35–21 62.5% #26 1,823 0 15 — — — — — — —
34 1978 15–16 48.4% #68 1,765 0 15 — — — — — — —
35 1979 17–16 51.5% #76 1,786 0 15 — — — — — — —
36 1980 11–13 45.8% #140 1,673 0 15 — — — — — — —
37 1981 0–5 0.0% #140 1,597 0 15 — — — — — — —