H2H data updated: 2026-09-01 00:00 UTC

Mark Cox vs Dick Crealy H2H: 2-1

Mark Cox holds a 2–1 lead over Dick Crealy in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Mark Cox leads 2–0 on clay, while Dick Crealy leads 1–0 on carpet. Most recently, Mark Cox won the 1977 Cincinnati Open round of 16 7-5 RET.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Mark Cox
GBR Age 83 Left-Handed 185 cm / 6'1"
H2H
2 – 1
3 main draw meetings
Dick Crealy
AUS Age 81 Right-Handed 191 cm / 6'3"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Mark Cox #14 7-5 (ret.) Dick Crealy #38 Match data Jul 16, 1977* R16 Cincinnati Open ATP 250 Clay
Mark Cox 6-4 1-6 6-3 Dick Crealy Match data Feb 21, 1976* R16 Rome Wct ATP 250 Clay
Dick Crealy 1-6 6-1 6-4 Mark Cox Match data Feb 3, 1974* R16 Dayton ATP 250 Carpet

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Mark Cox #486 #12 0 2,023 406 272 59.9% 0 0 0 0 13 13
Dick Crealy #509 #33 0 1,903 338 317 51.6% 0 0 0 0 2 2

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Mark Cox Dick Crealy
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
23 — — — — — — — 1968 31–16 66.0% — 1,646 0 0
24 1968 52–23 69.3% — 1,715 0 0 1969 30–23 56.6% — 1,639 0 0
25 1969 35–16 68.6% — 1,838 0 2 1970 32–21 60.4% — 1,700 0 1
26 1970 39–31 55.7% — 1,800 0 3 1971 10–23 30.3% — 1,598 0 1
27 1971 27–31 46.6% — 1,819 0 3 1972 18–14 56.2% — 1,716 0 1
28 1972 43–29 59.7% — 1,874 0 5 1973 31–33 48.4% #51 1,623 0 1
29 1973 56–28 66.7% #22 1,894 0 8 1974 41–39 51.2% #71 1,719 0 1
30 1974 24–16 60.0% #30 1,833 0 8 1975 41–37 52.6% #56 1,738 0 2
31 1975 30–12 71.4% #25 1,934 0 11 1976 49–35 58.3% #38 1,783 0 2
32 1976 22–15 59.5% #17 1,965 0 12 1977 31–30 50.8% #67 1,672 0 2
33 1977 35–21 62.5% #26 1,828 0 13 1978 19–33 36.5% #131 1,567 0 2
34 1978 15–16 48.4% #68 1,769 0 13 1979 1–10 9.1% #274 1,498 0 2
35 1979 17–16 51.5% #76 1,789 0 13 1980 3–2 60.0% #309 1,511 0 2
36 1980 11–13 45.8% #140 1,675 0 13 1981 1–1 50.0% — 1,509 0 2
37 1981 0–5 0.0% — 1,599 0 13 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Mark Cox Dick Crealy
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
23 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1968 — — — — 15 9 24 62.5% 16 7 23 69.6% — — — —
24 1968 24 11 35 68.6% 18 8 26 69.2% 6 2 8 75.0% 4 2 6 66.7% 1969 6 5 11 54.5% 15 8 23 65.2% 9 10 19 47.4% — — — —
25 1969 11 5 16 68.8% 12 6 18 66.7% 4 2 6 66.7% 8 3 11 72.7% 1970 6 6 12 50.0% 10 5 15 66.7% 16 8 24 66.7% 0 2 2 0.0%
26 1970 10 9 19 52.6% 14 6 20 70.0% 12 9 21 57.1% 3 7 10 30.0% 1971 2 4 6 33.3% 5 10 15 33.3% 3 4 7 42.9% 0 5 5 0.0%
27 1971 9 11 20 45.0% 8 7 15 53.3% 5 6 11 45.5% 5 7 12 41.7% 1972 2 2 4 50.0% 12 9 21 57.1% 4 3 7 57.1% — — — —
28 1972 14 9 23 60.9% 8 5 13 61.5% 2 1 3 66.7% 19 14 33 57.6% 1973 4 5 9 44.4% 6 10 16 37.5% 9 7 16 56.3% 12 11 23 52.2%
29 1973 11 4 15 73.3% 10 11 21 47.6% 10 2 12 83.3% 25 11 36 69.4% 1974 7 10 17 41.2% 17 17 34 50.0% 13 8 21 61.9% 4 4 8 50.0%
30 1974 8 4 12 66.7% 1 2 3 33.3% 2 2 4 50.0% 13 8 21 61.9% 1975 5 8 13 38.5% 21 15 36 58.3% 9 5 14 64.3% 6 9 15 40.0%
31 1975 3 2 5 60.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 2 1 3 66.7% 22 6 28 78.6% 1976 12 4 16 75.0% 30 20 50 60.0% 5 5 10 50.0% 2 6 8 25.0%
32 1976 9 2 11 81.8% 5 4 9 55.6% 2 2 4 50.0% 6 7 13 46.2% 1977 4 5 9 44.4% 19 16 35 54.3% 8 9 17 47.1% — — — —
33 1977 8 8 16 50.0% 5 5 10 50.0% 8 2 10 80.0% 14 6 20 70.0% 1978 2 5 7 28.6% 6 12 18 33.3% 3 6 9 33.3% 8 10 18 44.4%
34 1978 5 4 9 55.6% 2 1 3 66.7% 1 2 3 33.3% 7 9 16 43.8% 1979 0 2 2 0.0% 0 3 3 0.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 0 2 2 0.0%
35 1979 9 8 17 52.9% 1 2 3 33.3% 4 3 7 57.1% 3 3 6 50.0% 1980 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
36 1980 5 5 10 50.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 1981 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
37 1981 0 1 1 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 126 83 209 60.3% 89 65 154 57.8% 60 38 98 61.2% 131 86 217 60.4% — 53 58 111 47.7% 156 134 290 53.8% 97 76 173 56.1% 32 49 81 39.5%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Mark Cox Dick Crealy
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
23 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1968 1647 121.1 — — — — — -10 +56 61.9% +0.86 8–4 (67%) — — +0.41
24 1968 1715 125.1 — — — — +101 -20 -76 64.9% +1.14 9–9 (50%) — — +2.87 1969 1640 118.3 — — — — +10 +67 +26 55.6% +0.27 5–8 (38%) — — +1.20
25 1969 1839 129.2 — — — — +75 -68 -126 60.3% +0.67 12–5 (71%) — — +4.09 1970 1700 134.6 — — — — -75 +134 +67 59.1% +0.64 8–7 (53%) 6–4 (60%) — +0.35
26 1970 1800 135.6 — — — — -58 +55 +20 55.8% +0.34 9–10 (47%) 2–6 (25%) — -1.59 1971 1598 133.0 — — — — -33 +84 +121 29.9% -1.06 5–0 (100%) 2–3 (40%) — -4.26
27 1971 1819 144.9 — — — — -45 +46 -3 47.1% -0.09 6–6 (50%) 13–13 (50%) — -7.37 1972 1717 124.1 — — — — -157 +50 +30 55.6% +0.02 2–5 (29%) 4–1 (80%) — +1.63
28 1972 1874 146.7 — — — — -12 +65 -36 56.3% +0.44 18–12 (60%) 15–11 (58%) — -2.93 1973 1624 127.7 — — — — +8 +31 +65 48.6% +0.01 7–8 (47%) 8–10 (44%) — +0.24
29 1973 1894 146.3 — — — — +68 -87 +21 61.9% +0.79 18–9 (67%) 14–12 (54%) — -0.98 1974 1719 137.0 — — — — -67 -18 +78 51.5% +0.05 14–12 (54%) 14–17 (45%) — -0.63
30 1974 1833 142.2 — — — — +74 -51 +60 60.8% +0.62 3–7 (30%) 14–9 (61%) — -0.76 1975 1738 138.0 — — — — -69 +20 +95 50.8% +0.12 16–8 (67%) 15–9 (63%) — -1.44
31 1975 1934 154.1 — — — — +99 -157 -28 66.7% +1.39 6–3 (67%) 4–6 (40%) — -0.83 1976 1783 142.6 — — — — -2 -8 +8 58.4% +0.68 14–16 (47%) 12–17 (41%) — +2.69
32 1976 1965 146.6 — — — — +85 -198 -95 52.6% -0.01 12–4 (75%) 8–6 (57%) — -3.40 1977 1673 127.5 — — — — +57 +18 +45 49.7% -0.07 10–12 (45%) 10–7 (59%) — +1.90
33 1977 1828 146.3 — — — — +95 -114 +115 57.0% +0.45 11–3 (79%) 7–11 (39%) — -0.20 1978 1567 129.0 — — — — +98 +15 +91 40.5% -0.56 11–14 (44%) 3–13 (19%) — -0.07
34 1978 1770 142.4 — — — — +56 -48 +123 50.0% +0.15 3–5 (38%) 5–1 (83%) — -1.06 1979 1499 117.0 — — — — +99 +43 +128 22.2% -1.18 0–3 (0%) 1–5 (17%) — -0.27
35 1979 1790 141.2 — — — — +18 -86 +110 53.0% +0.22 3–6 (33%) 6–6 (50%) — -1.30 1980 1512 105.5 — — — — +100 — — 50.0% +0.60 1–1 0–1 — +1.27
36 1980 1676 120.6 — — — — +49 -18 +194 46.8% -0.26 4–4 (50%) 7–6 (54%) — +1.71 1981 1510 100.0 — — — — — — — 50.0% -0.25 — 1–1 — +0.51
37 1981 1599 106.1 — — — — — — — 21.4% -1.79 0–2 1–1 — -0.05 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 2023 146.1 — — — — +46 -36 +21 57.2% +0.50 114–85 (57%) 96–88 (52%) 101.1 -1.75 — 1904 135.4 — — — — -9 +24 +62 51.7% +0.15 101–98 (51%) 76–88 (46%) 95.7 +0.54

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.