H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Mark Cox vs Douglas Palm H2H: 2-1
Mark Cox holds a 2–1 lead over Douglas Palm in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on hard courts, while Mark Cox leads 1–0 on carpet. Most recently, Douglas Palm won the 1978 Stockholm second round 2-6 7-5 6-1.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
GBR
Age 83
Left-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H
2
–
1
3 main draw meetings
SWE
Age 71
Right-Handed
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 8, 1978* | Stockholm | ATP 250 | R64 | Hard | Douglas Palm | 2-6 7-5 6-1 | Mark Cox | Match data |
| Mar 17, 1977* | Helsinki | ATP 250 | R32 | Carpet | Mark Cox | 3-6 6-4 6-3 | Douglas Palm | Match data |
| Nov 10, 1976* | Stockholm | ATP 250 | R32 | Hard | Mark Cox | 2-6 7-6 6-2 | Douglas Palm | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mark Cox | #486 | #12 | 0 | 2,009 | 408 | 274 | 59.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 15 | 15 |
| Douglas Palm | #276 | #159 | 0 | 1,541 | 17 | 46 | 27.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Mark Cox | Douglas Palm | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1972 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,480 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1973 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,468 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1974 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #228 | 1,479 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1975 | 4–5 | 44.4% | #168 | 1,511 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1976 | 4–9 | 30.8% | #166 | 1,523 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1977 | 4–16 | 20.0% | #173 | 1,435 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1978 | 3–9 | 25.0% | #236 | 1,462 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1968 | 52–23 | 69.3% | — | 1,722 | 0 | 2 | 1979 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #276 | 1,455 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 1969 | 35–16 | 68.6% | — | 1,836 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 26 | 1970 | 39–31 | 55.7% | — | 1,796 | 0 | 5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 1971 | 27–31 | 46.6% | — | 1,815 | 0 | 5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 1972 | 43–29 | 59.7% | — | 1,871 | 0 | 7 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 1973 | 56–28 | 66.7% | #22 | 1,890 | 0 | 10 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 1974 | 25–17 | 59.5% | #30 | 1,828 | 0 | 10 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 1975 | 31–13 | 70.5% | #25 | 1,915 | 0 | 13 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 1976 | 22–15 | 59.5% | #17 | 1,954 | 0 | 14 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 33 | 1977 | 35–21 | 62.5% | #26 | 1,823 | 0 | 15 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 34 | 1978 | 15–16 | 48.4% | #68 | 1,765 | 0 | 15 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 35 | 1979 | 17–16 | 51.5% | #76 | 1,786 | 0 | 15 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 36 | 1980 | 11–13 | 45.8% | #140 | 1,673 | 0 | 15 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 37 | 1981 | 0–5 | 0.0% | #140 | 1,597 | 0 | 15 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |