H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 17:48 UTC
Mark Cox vs Francois Jauffret H2H: 2-0
Mark Cox holds a 2–0 lead over Francois Jauffret in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Mark Cox leads 2–0 on clay. Most recently, Mark Cox won the 1971 Bournemouth third round 6-2 2-6 8-6 4-6 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
GBR
Age 83
Left-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H
2
–
0
2 main draw meetings
FRA
Age 84
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 25, 1971* | Bournemouth | ATP 250 | R32 | Clay | Mark Cox | 6-2 2-6 8-6 4-6 6-2 | Francois Jauffret | Match data |
| May 19, 1970* | Rome | Masters 1000 | R32 | Clay | Mark Cox | 6-4 2-6 8-6 6-3 | Francois Jauffret | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mark Cox | #486 | #12 | 0 | 2,009 | 408 | 274 | 59.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 15 | 15 |
| Francois Jauffret | #662 | #20 | 0 | 1,889 | 194 | 131 | 59.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Mark Cox | Francois Jauffret | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 24 | 1968 | 52–23 | 69.3% | — | 1,722 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 25 | 1969 | 35–16 | 68.6% | — | 1,836 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 26 | 1970 | 39–31 | 55.7% | — | 1,796 | 0 | 5 | 1968 | 14–5 | 73.7% | — | 1,662 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 1971 | 27–31 | 46.6% | — | 1,815 | 0 | 5 | 1969 | 19–8 | 70.4% | — | 1,806 | 0 | 1 |
| 28 | 1972 | 43–29 | 59.7% | — | 1,871 | 0 | 7 | 1970 | 13–11 | 54.2% | — | 1,731 | 0 | 1 |
| 29 | 1973 | 56–28 | 66.7% | #22 | 1,890 | 0 | 10 | 1971 | 14–12 | 53.8% | — | 1,666 | 0 | 1 |
| 30 | 1974 | 25–17 | 59.5% | #30 | 1,828 | 0 | 10 | 1972 | 12–8 | 60.0% | — | 1,732 | 0 | 1 |
| 31 | 1975 | 31–13 | 70.5% | #25 | 1,915 | 0 | 13 | 1973 | 24–17 | 58.5% | #45 | 1,769 | 0 | 1 |
| 32 | 1976 | 22–15 | 59.5% | #17 | 1,954 | 0 | 14 | 1974 | 25–15 | 62.5% | #20 | 1,769 | 0 | 1 |
| 33 | 1977 | 35–21 | 62.5% | #26 | 1,823 | 0 | 15 | 1975 | 22–14 | 61.1% | #39 | 1,797 | 0 | 1 |
| 34 | 1978 | 15–16 | 48.4% | #68 | 1,765 | 0 | 15 | 1976 | 24–13 | 64.9% | #26 | 1,831 | 0 | 1 |
| 35 | 1979 | 17–16 | 51.5% | #76 | 1,786 | 0 | 15 | 1977 | 20–12 | 62.5% | #58 | 1,748 | 0 | 2 |
| 36 | 1980 | 11–13 | 45.8% | #140 | 1,673 | 0 | 15 | 1978 | 6–11 | 35.3% | #180 | 1,611 | 0 | 2 |
| 37 | 1981 | 0–5 | 0.0% | #140 | 1,597 | 0 | 15 | 1979 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #284 | 1,581 | 0 | 2 |
| 38 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1980 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #423 | 1,565 | 0 | 2 |