H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 08:25 UTC
Mark Cox vs Frew Mcmillan H2H: 1-1
Mark Cox and Frew Mcmillan are tied 1–1 in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Mark Cox leads 1–0 on carpet, while Frew Mcmillan leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Mark Cox won the 1974 Philadelphia Wct third round 6-3 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
GBR
Age 83
Left-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H
1
–
1
2 main draw meetings
RSA
Age 84
Right-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 24, 1974* | Philadelphia Wct | ATP 250 | R32 | Carpet | Mark Cox | 6-3 6-2 | Frew Mcmillan | Match data |
| Mar 29, 1970* | Johannesburg | ATP 250 | QF | Hard | Frew Mcmillan | 6-2 6-4 2-6 6-3 | Mark Cox | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mark Cox | #486 | #12 | 0 | 2,009 | 408 | 274 | 59.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 15 | 15 |
| Frew Mcmillan | #747 | #39 | 0 | 1,803 | 201 | 247 | 44.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Mark Cox | Frew Mcmillan | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 24 | 1968 | 52–23 | 69.3% | — | 1,722 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 25 | 1969 | 35–16 | 68.6% | — | 1,836 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 26 | 1970 | 39–31 | 55.7% | — | 1,796 | 0 | 5 | 1968 | 16–13 | 55.2% | — | 1,532 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 1971 | 27–31 | 46.6% | — | 1,815 | 0 | 5 | 1969 | 8–12 | 40.0% | — | 1,505 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 1972 | 43–29 | 59.7% | — | 1,871 | 0 | 7 | 1970 | 29–21 | 58.0% | — | 1,678 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 1973 | 56–28 | 66.7% | #22 | 1,890 | 0 | 10 | 1971 | 14–32 | 30.4% | — | 1,613 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | 1974 | 25–17 | 59.5% | #30 | 1,828 | 0 | 10 | 1972 | 31–26 | 54.4% | — | 1,748 | 0 | 0 |
| 31 | 1975 | 31–13 | 70.5% | #25 | 1,915 | 0 | 13 | 1973 | 25–36 | 41.0% | #78 | 1,577 | 0 | 0 |
| 32 | 1976 | 22–15 | 59.5% | #17 | 1,954 | 0 | 14 | 1974 | 20–18 | 52.6% | #46 | 1,723 | 0 | 1 |
| 33 | 1977 | 35–21 | 62.5% | #26 | 1,823 | 0 | 15 | 1975 | 13–18 | 41.9% | #59 | 1,687 | 0 | 1 |
| 34 | 1978 | 15–16 | 48.4% | #68 | 1,765 | 0 | 15 | 1976 | 13–20 | 39.4% | #86 | 1,722 | 0 | 2 |
| 35 | 1979 | 17–16 | 51.5% | #76 | 1,786 | 0 | 15 | 1977 | 18–20 | 47.4% | #61 | 1,745 | 0 | 2 |
| 36 | 1980 | 11–13 | 45.8% | #140 | 1,673 | 0 | 15 | 1978 | 10–18 | 35.7% | #124 | 1,676 | 0 | 2 |
| 37 | 1981 | 0–5 | 0.0% | #140 | 1,597 | 0 | 15 | 1979 | 4–8 | 33.3% | #226 | 1,647 | 0 | 2 |
| 38 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1980 | 0–4 | 0.0% | — | 1,579 | 0 | 2 |
| 39 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1981 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #510 | 1,558 | 0 | 2 |