H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 14:16 UTC
Mark Cox vs Hans Joachim Ploetz H2H: 1-1
Mark Cox and Hans Joachim Ploetz are tied 1–1 in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Hans Joachim Ploetz leads 1–0 on clay, while Mark Cox leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Hans Joachim Ploetz won the 1969 St. Petersburg third round 6-1 2-6 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
GBR
Age 83
Left-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H
1
–
1
2 main draw meetings
GER
Right-Handed
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 20, 1969* | St. Petersburg | ATP 250 | R32 | Clay | Hans Joachim Ploetz | 6-1 2-6 6-4 | Mark Cox | Match data |
| Jan 6, 1968* | Cape Town | ATP 250 | QF | Hard | Mark Cox | 6-2 6-1 | Hans Joachim Ploetz | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mark Cox | #486 | #12 | 0 | 2,009 | 408 | 274 | 59.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 15 | 15 |
| Hans Joachim Ploetz | #281 | #65 | 0 | 1,661 | 70 | 94 | 42.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Mark Cox | Hans Joachim Ploetz | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 1968 | 52–23 | 69.3% | — | 1,722 | 0 | 2 | 1968 | 14–11 | 56.0% | — | 1,549 | 0 | 0 |
| 1969 | 35–16 | 68.6% | — | 1,836 | 0 | 4 | 1969 | 18–16 | 52.9% | — | 1,605 | 0 | 0 |
| 1970 | 39–31 | 55.7% | — | 1,796 | 0 | 5 | 1970 | 12–17 | 41.4% | — | 1,628 | 0 | 0 |
| 1971 | 27–31 | 46.6% | — | 1,815 | 0 | 5 | 1971 | 2–5 | 28.6% | — | 1,578 | 0 | 0 |
| 1972 | 43–29 | 59.7% | — | 1,871 | 0 | 7 | 1972 | 2–5 | 28.6% | — | 1,540 | 0 | 0 |
| 1973 | 56–28 | 66.7% | #22 | 1,890 | 0 | 10 | 1973 | 2–5 | 28.6% | — | 1,531 | 0 | 0 |
| 1974 | 25–17 | 59.5% | #30 | 1,828 | 0 | 10 | 1974 | 5–9 | 35.7% | #95 | 1,572 | 0 | 0 |
| 1975 | 31–13 | 70.5% | #25 | 1,915 | 0 | 13 | 1975 | 13–16 | 44.8% | #76 | 1,610 | 0 | 0 |
| 1976 | 22–15 | 59.5% | #17 | 1,954 | 0 | 14 | 1976 | 2–10 | 16.7% | #185 | 1,514 | 0 | 0 |
| 1977 | 35–21 | 62.5% | #26 | 1,823 | 0 | 15 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1978 | 15–16 | 48.4% | #68 | 1,765 | 0 | 15 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1979 | 17–16 | 51.5% | #76 | 1,786 | 0 | 15 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1980 | 11–13 | 45.8% | #140 | 1,673 | 0 | 15 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1981 | 0–5 | 0.0% | #140 | 1,597 | 0 | 15 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |