H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Mark Cox vs Herb Fitzgibbon H2H: 2-0
Mark Cox holds a 2–0 lead over Herb Fitzgibbon in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Mark Cox leads 1–0 on grass and 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Mark Cox won the 1968 Wimbledon second round 4-6 6-3 7-9 9-7 12-10.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
GBR
Age 83
Left-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H
2
–
0
2 main draw meetings
USA
Age 84
Right-Handed
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 28, 1968* | Wimbledon | Grand Slam | R64 | Grass | Mark Cox | 4-6 6-3 7-9 9-7 12-10 | Herb Fitzgibbon | Match data |
| Apr 5, 1968* | San Juan | ATP 250 | R16 | Hard | Mark Cox | 12-10 8-6 | Herb Fitzgibbon | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mark Cox | #486 | #12 | 0 | 2,009 | 408 | 274 | 59.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 15 | 15 |
| Herb Fitzgibbon | #291 | #128 | 0 | 1,693 | 46 | 38 | 54.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Mark Cox | Herb Fitzgibbon | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 24 | 1968 | 52–23 | 69.3% | — | 1,722 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 25 | 1969 | 35–16 | 68.6% | — | 1,836 | 0 | 4 | 1968 | 29–17 | 63.0% | — | 1,661 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | 1970 | 39–31 | 55.7% | — | 1,796 | 0 | 5 | 1969 | 4–6 | 40.0% | — | 1,595 | 0 | 1 |
| 27 | 1971 | 27–31 | 46.6% | — | 1,815 | 0 | 5 | 1970 | 1–4 | 20.0% | — | 1,547 | 0 | 1 |
| 28 | 1972 | 43–29 | 59.7% | — | 1,871 | 0 | 7 | 1971 | 6–3 | 66.7% | — | 1,611 | 0 | 1 |
| 29 | 1973 | 56–28 | 66.7% | #22 | 1,890 | 0 | 10 | 1972 | 1–3 | 25.0% | — | 1,611 | 0 | 1 |
| 30 | 1974 | 25–17 | 59.5% | #30 | 1,828 | 0 | 10 | 1973 | 5–5 | 50.0% | #167 | 1,624 | 0 | 1 |
| 31 | 1975 | 31–13 | 70.5% | #25 | 1,915 | 0 | 13 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 1976 | 22–15 | 59.5% | #17 | 1,954 | 0 | 14 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 33 | 1977 | 35–21 | 62.5% | #26 | 1,823 | 0 | 15 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 34 | 1978 | 15–16 | 48.4% | #68 | 1,765 | 0 | 15 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 35 | 1979 | 17–16 | 51.5% | #76 | 1,786 | 0 | 15 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 36 | 1980 | 11–13 | 45.8% | #140 | 1,673 | 0 | 15 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 37 | 1981 | 0–5 | 0.0% | #140 | 1,597 | 0 | 15 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |