H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Mark Cox vs Jim Osborne H2H: 3-0
Mark Cox holds a 3–0 lead over Jim Osborne in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Mark Cox leads 2–0 on hard courts and 1–0 on carpet. Most recently, Mark Cox won the 1971 South Orange second round 7-6 6-7 7-6.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
GBR
Age 83
Left-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H
3
–
0
3 main draw meetings
USA
Age 81
Right-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 3, 1971* | South Orange | ATP 250 | R64 | Hard | Mark Cox | 7-6 6-7 7-6 | Jim Osborne | Match data |
| Feb 22, 1969* | Macon | ATP 250 | SF | Carpet | Mark Cox | 9-7 1-6 6-3 | Jim Osborne | Match data |
| Mar 2, 1968* | Kingston | ATP 250 | QF | Hard | Mark Cox | 6-3 6-1 | Jim Osborne | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mark Cox | #486 | #12 | 0 | 2,009 | 408 | 274 | 59.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 15 | 15 |
| Jim Osborne | #831 | #211 | 0 | 1,817 | 118 | 121 | 49.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Mark Cox | Jim Osborne | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 23 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1968 | 35–24 | 59.3% | — | 1,635 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1968 | 52–23 | 69.3% | — | 1,722 | 0 | 2 | 1969 | 29–17 | 63.0% | — | 1,745 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 1969 | 35–16 | 68.6% | — | 1,836 | 0 | 4 | 1970 | 26–29 | 47.3% | — | 1,665 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 1970 | 39–31 | 55.7% | — | 1,796 | 0 | 5 | 1971 | 15–19 | 44.1% | — | 1,699 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 1971 | 27–31 | 46.6% | — | 1,815 | 0 | 5 | 1972 | 8–20 | 28.6% | — | 1,517 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 1972 | 43–29 | 59.7% | — | 1,871 | 0 | 7 | 1973 | 0–4 | 0.0% | — | 1,494 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 1973 | 56–28 | 66.7% | #22 | 1,890 | 0 | 10 | 1974 | 3–2 | 60.0% | #228 | 1,548 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | 1974 | 25–17 | 59.5% | #30 | 1,828 | 0 | 10 | 1975 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #308 | 1,544 | 0 | 0 |
| 31 | 1975 | 31–13 | 70.5% | #25 | 1,915 | 0 | 13 | 1976 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #211 | 1,571 | 0 | 0 |
| 32 | 1976 | 22–15 | 59.5% | #17 | 1,954 | 0 | 14 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 33 | 1977 | 35–21 | 62.5% | #26 | 1,823 | 0 | 15 | 1978 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #465 | 1,569 | 0 | 0 |
| 34 | 1978 | 15–16 | 48.4% | #68 | 1,765 | 0 | 15 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 35 | 1979 | 17–16 | 51.5% | #76 | 1,786 | 0 | 15 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 36 | 1980 | 11–13 | 45.8% | #140 | 1,673 | 0 | 15 | 1981 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,551 | 0 | 0 |
| 37 | 1981 | 0–5 | 0.0% | #140 | 1,597 | 0 | 15 | 1982 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,538 | 0 | 0 |