H2H data updated: 2026-09-02 00:00 UTC

Mark Cox vs Jim Osborne H2H: 3-0

Mark Cox holds a 3–0 lead over Jim Osborne in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Mark Cox leads 2–0 on hard courts and 1–0 on carpet. Most recently, Mark Cox won the 1971 South Orange round of 64 7-6 6-7 7-6.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Mark Cox
GBR Age 83 Left-Handed 185 cm / 6'1"
H2H
3 – 0
3 main draw meetings
Jim Osborne
USA Age 81 Right-Handed 185 cm / 6'1"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Mark Cox 7-6 6-7 7-6 Jim Osborne Match data Sep 3, 1971* R64 South Orange ATP 250 Hard
Mark Cox 9-7 1-6 6-3 Jim Osborne Match data Feb 22, 1969* SF Macon ATP 250 Carpet
Mark Cox 6-3 6-1 Jim Osborne Match data Mar 2, 1968* QF Kingston ATP 250 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Mark Cox #486 #12 0 2,023 406 272 59.9% 0 0 0 0 13 13
Jim Osborne #831 #211 0 1,811 118 121 49.4% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Mark Cox Jim Osborne
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
23 — — — — — — — 1968 35–24 59.3% — 1,634 0 0
24 1968 52–23 69.3% — 1,715 0 0 1969 29–17 63.0% — 1,743 0 0
25 1969 35–16 68.6% — 1,838 0 2 1970 26–29 47.3% — 1,665 0 0
26 1970 39–31 55.7% — 1,800 0 3 1971 15–19 44.1% — 1,717 0 0
27 1971 27–31 46.6% — 1,819 0 3 1972 8–20 28.6% — 1,525 0 0
28 1972 43–29 59.7% — 1,874 0 5 1973 0–4 0.0% — 1,500 0 0
29 1973 56–28 66.7% #22 1,894 0 8 1974 3–2 60.0% #228 1,553 0 0
30 1974 24–16 60.0% #30 1,833 0 8 1975 0–1 0.0% #308 1,550 0 0
31 1975 30–12 71.4% #25 1,934 0 11 1976 2–2 50.0% #211 1,575 0 0
32 1976 22–15 59.5% #17 1,965 0 12 — — — — — — —
33 1977 35–21 62.5% #26 1,828 0 13 1978 0–1 0.0% #465 1,573 0 0
34 1978 15–16 48.4% #68 1,769 0 13 — — — — — — —
35 1979 17–16 51.5% #76 1,789 0 13 — — — — — — —
36 1980 11–13 45.8% #140 1,675 0 13 1981 0–1 0.0% — 1,555 0 0
37 1981 0–5 0.0% — 1,599 0 13 1982 0–1 0.0% — 1,542 0 0

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Mark Cox Jim Osborne
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
23 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1968 19 12 31 61.3% 4 3 7 57.1% 11 8 19 57.9% 1 1 2 50.0%
24 1968 24 11 35 68.6% 18 8 26 69.2% 6 2 8 75.0% 4 2 6 66.7% 1969 8 5 13 61.5% 7 4 11 63.6% 8 5 13 61.5% 6 3 9 66.7%
25 1969 11 5 16 68.8% 12 6 18 66.7% 4 2 6 66.7% 8 3 11 72.7% 1970 16 12 28 57.1% 5 8 13 38.5% 4 5 9 44.4% 1 4 5 20.0%
26 1970 10 9 19 52.6% 14 6 20 70.0% 12 9 21 57.1% 3 7 10 30.0% 1971 7 10 17 41.2% 2 4 6 33.3% 4 2 6 66.7% 2 3 5 40.0%
27 1971 9 11 20 45.0% 8 7 15 53.3% 5 6 11 45.5% 5 7 12 41.7% 1972 3 6 9 33.3% 1 5 6 16.7% 0 3 3 0.0% 4 6 10 40.0%
28 1972 14 9 23 60.9% 8 5 13 61.5% 2 1 3 66.7% 19 14 33 57.6% 1973 0 4 4 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 1973 11 4 15 73.3% 10 11 21 47.6% 10 2 12 83.3% 25 11 36 69.4% 1974 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — 2 1 3 66.7%
30 1974 8 4 12 66.7% 1 2 3 33.3% 2 2 4 50.0% 13 8 21 61.9% 1975 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 1975 3 2 5 60.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 2 1 3 66.7% 22 6 28 78.6% 1976 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — 1 1 2 50.0%
32 1976 9 2 11 81.8% 5 4 9 55.6% 2 2 4 50.0% 6 7 13 46.2% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 1977 8 8 16 50.0% 5 5 10 50.0% 8 2 10 80.0% 14 6 20 70.0% 1978 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 1978 5 4 9 55.6% 2 1 3 66.7% 1 2 3 33.3% 7 9 16 43.8% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 1979 9 8 17 52.9% 1 2 3 33.3% 4 3 7 57.1% 3 3 6 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
36 1980 5 5 10 50.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 1981 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
37 1981 0 1 1 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 1982 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 126 83 209 60.3% 89 65 154 57.8% 60 38 98 61.2% 131 86 217 60.4% — 55 55 110 50.0% 19 24 43 44.2% 27 23 50 54.0% 17 19 36 47.2%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Mark Cox Jim Osborne
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
23 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1968 1634 115.0 — — — — +72 -103 -46 57.0% +0.47 7–9 (44%) — — -0.30
24 1968 1715 125.1 — — — — +101 -20 -76 64.9% +1.14 9–9 (50%) — — +2.87 1969 1744 126.2 — — — — +78 -107 -67 58.3% +0.69 8–2 (80%) — — +1.41
25 1969 1839 129.2 — — — — +75 -68 -126 60.3% +0.67 12–5 (71%) — — +4.09 1970 1665 122.6 — — — — +52 -115 +4 46.3% -0.07 9–10 (47%) 4–3 (57%) — +2.54
26 1970 1800 135.6 — — — — -58 +55 +20 55.8% +0.34 9–10 (47%) 2–6 (25%) — -1.59 1971 1717 116.9 — — — — -83 -182 +67 49.3% -0.23 1–3 (25%) 9–7 (56%) — +0.99
27 1971 1819 144.9 — — — — -45 +46 -3 47.1% -0.09 6–6 (50%) 13–13 (50%) — -7.37 1972 1525 122.7 — — — — +64 -28 +142 38.9% -0.29 1–10 (9%) 1–12 (8%) — +1.15
28 1972 1874 146.7 — — — — -12 +65 -36 56.3% +0.44 18–12 (60%) 15–11 (58%) — -2.93 1973 1501 104.3 — — — — +40 — — 11.1% -1.67 0–1 1–2 (33%) — -0.09
29 1973 1894 146.3 — — — — +68 -87 +21 61.9% +0.79 18–9 (67%) 14–12 (54%) — -0.98 1974 1553 112.6 — — — — +29 — — 58.3% +0.42 1–1 2–1 (67%) — +0.21
30 1974 1833 142.2 — — — — +74 -51 +60 60.8% +0.62 3–7 (30%) 14–9 (61%) — -0.76 1975 1550 104.5 — — — — — — — 0.0% -3.00 — — — -0.16
31 1975 1934 154.1 — — — — +99 -157 -28 66.7% +1.39 6–3 (67%) 4–6 (40%) — -0.83 1976 1576 112.5 — — — — +12 — — 50.0% +0.17 2–2 (50%) — — -0.11
32 1976 1965 146.6 — — — — +85 -198 -95 52.6% -0.01 12–4 (75%) 8–6 (57%) — -3.40 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 1977 1828 146.3 — — — — +95 -114 +115 57.0% +0.45 11–3 (79%) 7–11 (39%) — -0.20 1978 1574 109.5 — — — — — — — 0.0% -3.50 — — — -0.24
34 1978 1770 142.4 — — — — +56 -48 +123 50.0% +0.15 3–5 (38%) 5–1 (83%) — -1.06 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 1979 1790 141.2 — — — — +18 -86 +110 53.0% +0.22 3–6 (33%) 6–6 (50%) — -1.30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
36 1980 1676 120.6 — — — — +49 -18 +194 46.8% -0.26 4–4 (50%) 7–6 (54%) — +1.71 1981 1556 95.7 — — — — — — — 0.0% -3.00 — — — +0.19
37 1981 1599 106.1 — — — — — — — 21.4% -1.79 0–2 1–1 — -0.05 1982 1543 98.8 — — — — — — — 0.0% -3.50 — — — +0.07
Career — 2023 146.1 — — — — +46 -36 +21 57.2% +0.50 114–85 (57%) 96–88 (52%) 101.1 -1.75 — 1812 123.5 — — — — +39 -108 -18 49.9% +0.11 29–38 (43%) 17–25 (40%) 93.8 +2.40

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.