H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Mark Cox vs Jurgen Fassbender H2H: 2-1
Mark Cox holds a 2–1 lead over Jurgen Fassbender in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Mark Cox leads 1–0 on clay, while Jurgen Fassbender leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Jurgen Fassbender won the 1974 Wimbledon first round 6-2 6-4 7-9 7-5.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
GBR
Age 83
Left-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H
2
–
1
3 main draw meetings
GER
Age 78
Right-Handed
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 26, 1974* | Wimbledon | Grand Slam | R128 | Grass | Jurgen Fassbender | 6-2 6-4 7-9 7-5 | Mark Cox | Match data |
| Dec 1, 1973* | Johannesburg | ATP 250 | R16 | Hard | Mark Cox | 7-5 7-6 1-6 6-3 | Jurgen Fassbender | Match data |
| Aug 16, 1968* | Hamburg | ATP 250 | R32 | Clay | Mark Cox | 6-1 6-4 6-2 | Jurgen Fassbender | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mark Cox | #486 | #12 | 0 | 2,009 | 408 | 274 | 59.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 15 | 15 |
| Jurgen Fassbender | #618 | #31 | 0 | 1,868 | 170 | 167 | 50.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Mark Cox | Jurgen Fassbender | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1968 | 8–10 | 44.4% | — | 1,488 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1969 | 2–5 | 28.6% | — | 1,452 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1970 | 1–5 | 16.7% | — | 1,409 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1971 | 2–6 | 25.0% | — | 1,412 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1968 | 52–23 | 69.3% | — | 1,722 | 0 | 2 | 1972 | 6–10 | 37.5% | — | 1,531 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 1969 | 35–16 | 68.6% | — | 1,836 | 0 | 4 | 1973 | 45–24 | 65.2% | #46 | 1,729 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | 1970 | 39–31 | 55.7% | — | 1,796 | 0 | 5 | 1974 | 41–30 | 57.7% | #54 | 1,730 | 0 | 2 |
| 27 | 1971 | 27–31 | 46.6% | — | 1,815 | 0 | 5 | 1975 | 23–24 | 48.9% | #64 | 1,655 | 0 | 2 |
| 28 | 1972 | 43–29 | 59.7% | — | 1,871 | 0 | 7 | 1976 | 9–12 | 42.9% | #93 | 1,650 | 0 | 2 |
| 29 | 1973 | 56–28 | 66.7% | #22 | 1,890 | 0 | 10 | 1977 | 18–20 | 47.4% | #64 | 1,662 | 0 | 2 |
| 30 | 1974 | 25–17 | 59.5% | #30 | 1,828 | 0 | 10 | 1978 | 11–14 | 44.0% | #151 | 1,667 | 0 | 2 |
| 31 | 1975 | 31–13 | 70.5% | #25 | 1,915 | 0 | 13 | 1979 | 4–5 | 44.4% | #242 | 1,627 | 0 | 2 |
| 32 | 1976 | 22–15 | 59.5% | #17 | 1,954 | 0 | 14 | 1980 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #482 | 1,617 | 0 | 2 |
| 33 | 1977 | 35–21 | 62.5% | #26 | 1,823 | 0 | 15 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 34 | 1978 | 15–16 | 48.4% | #68 | 1,765 | 0 | 15 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 35 | 1979 | 17–16 | 51.5% | #76 | 1,786 | 0 | 15 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 36 | 1980 | 11–13 | 45.8% | #140 | 1,673 | 0 | 15 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 37 | 1981 | 0–5 | 0.0% | #140 | 1,597 | 0 | 15 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |