H2H data updated: 2026-09-09 00:00 UTC

Mark Cox vs Jurgen Fassbender H2H: 2-1

Mark Cox holds a 2–1 lead over Jurgen Fassbender in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Mark Cox leads 1–0 on clay, while Jurgen Fassbender leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Jurgen Fassbender won the 1974 Wimbledon round of 128 6-2 6-4 7-9 7-5.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Mark Cox
GBR Age 83 Left-Handed 185 cm / 6'1"
H2H
2 – 1
3 main-draw meetings
Jurgen Fassbender
GER Age 78 Right-Handed

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Jurgen Fassbender 6-2 6-4 7-9 7-5 Mark Cox Match data Jun 26, 1974* R128 Wimbledon Grand Slam Grass
Mark Cox #21 7-5 7-6 1-6 6-3 Jurgen Fassbender #39 Match data Dec 1, 1973* R16 South African Open ATP 250 Hard
Mark Cox 6-1 6-4 6-2 Jurgen Fassbender Match data Aug 16, 1968* R32 Hamburg Open ATP 250 Clay

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Mark Cox #486 #12 0 2,023 406 272 59.9% 0 0 0 0 13 13
Jurgen Fassbender #618 #31 0 1,883 184 168 52.3% 0 0 0 0 3 3

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Mark Cox Jurgen Fassbender
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
20 — — — — — — — 1968 8–10 44.4% — 1,485 0 0
21 — — — — — — — 1969 2–5 28.6% — 1,452 0 0
22 — — — — — — — 1970 2–6 25.0% — 1,426 0 0
23 — — — — — — — 1971 2–6 25.0% — 1,424 0 0
24 1968 52–23 69.3% — 1,715 0 0 1972 9–11 45.0% — 1,630 0 0
25 1969 35–16 68.6% — 1,838 0 2 1973 48–25 65.8% #46 1,737 0 1
26 1970 39–31 55.7% — 1,800 0 3 1974 41–30 57.7% #54 1,735 0 2
27 1971 27–31 46.6% — 1,819 0 3 1975 28–25 52.8% #64 1,680 0 3
28 1972 43–29 59.7% — 1,874 0 5 1976 9–12 42.9% #93 1,662 0 3
29 1973 56–28 66.7% #22 1,894 0 8 1977 21–21 50.0% #63 1,684 0 3
30 1974 24–16 60.0% #30 1,833 0 8 1978 10–12 45.5% #151 1,671 0 3
31 1975 30–12 71.4% #25 1,934 0 11 1979 4–5 44.4% #242 1,630 0 3
32 1976 22–15 59.5% #17 1,965 0 12 — — — — — — —
33 1977 35–21 62.5% #26 1,828 0 13 — — — — — — —
34 1978 15–16 48.4% #68 1,769 0 13 — — — — — — —
35 1979 17–16 51.5% #76 1,789 0 13 — — — — — — —
36 1980 11–13 45.8% #140 1,675 0 13 — — — — — — —
37 1981 0–5 0.0% — 1,599 0 13 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Mark Cox Jurgen Fassbender
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
20 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1968 2 3 5 40.0% 6 5 11 54.5% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
21 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1969 — — — — 2 5 7 28.6% — — — — — — — —
22 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1970 — — — — 2 4 6 33.3% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — —
23 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1971 — — — — 2 4 6 33.3% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — —
24 1968 24 11 35 68.6% 18 8 26 69.2% 6 2 8 75.0% 4 2 6 66.7% 1972 0 1 1 0.0% 6 6 12 50.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
25 1969 11 5 16 68.8% 12 6 18 66.7% 4 2 6 66.7% 8 3 11 72.7% 1973 19 12 31 61.3% 13 7 20 65.0% 7 4 11 63.6% 9 2 11 81.8%
26 1970 10 9 19 52.6% 14 6 20 70.0% 12 9 21 57.1% 3 7 10 30.0% 1974 13 10 23 56.5% 11 7 18 61.1% 4 3 7 57.1% 13 10 23 56.5%
27 1971 9 11 20 45.0% 8 7 15 53.3% 5 6 11 45.5% 5 7 12 41.7% 1975 6 3 9 66.7% 14 13 27 51.9% 1 1 2 50.0% 7 8 15 46.7%
28 1972 14 9 23 60.9% 8 5 13 61.5% 2 1 3 66.7% 19 14 33 57.6% 1976 2 3 5 40.0% 7 8 15 46.7% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
29 1973 11 4 15 73.3% 10 11 21 47.6% 10 2 12 83.3% 25 11 36 69.4% 1977 4 7 11 36.4% 14 10 24 58.3% 2 2 4 50.0% 1 2 3 33.3%
30 1974 8 4 12 66.7% 1 2 3 33.3% 2 2 4 50.0% 13 8 21 61.9% 1978 0 1 1 0.0% 10 11 21 47.6% — — — — — — — —
31 1975 3 2 5 60.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 2 1 3 66.7% 22 6 28 78.6% 1979 — — — — 2 4 6 33.3% — — — — 2 1 3 66.7%
32 1976 9 2 11 81.8% 5 4 9 55.6% 2 2 4 50.0% 6 7 13 46.2% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 1977 8 8 16 50.0% 5 5 10 50.0% 8 2 10 80.0% 14 6 20 70.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 1978 5 4 9 55.6% 2 1 3 66.7% 1 2 3 33.3% 7 9 16 43.8% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 1979 9 8 17 52.9% 1 2 3 33.3% 4 3 7 57.1% 3 3 6 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
36 1980 5 5 10 50.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
37 1981 0 1 1 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 126 83 209 60.3% 89 65 154 57.8% 60 38 98 61.2% 131 86 217 60.4% — 46 40 86 53.5% 89 84 173 51.4% 17 19 36 47.2% 32 25 57 56.1%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Mark Cox Jurgen Fassbender
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
20 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1968 1485 103.8 — — — — -17 +56 — 44.9% -0.45 1–3 (25%) — — +0.33
21 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1969 1452 100.2 — — — — — +12 — 36.0% -0.80 1–2 (33%) — — +0.20
22 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1970 1426 98.3 — — — — — +41 — 26.7% -1.47 — 0–2 — +0.50
23 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1971 1424 108.2 — — — — — +51 — 41.9% -0.71 0–2 — — +0.46
24 1968 1715 125.1 — — — — +102 -21 -76 64.9% +1.14 9–9 (50%) — — +2.86 1972 1631 121.0 — — — — — +9 -106 48.3% -0.25 2–1 (67%) 1–1 — -0.26
25 1969 1839 129.2 — — — — +75 -68 -126 60.3% +0.67 12–5 (71%) — — +4.09 1973 1737 130.6 — — — — +19 -2 -109 61.4% +0.86 13–8 (62%) 4–7 (36%) 103.2 +8.15
26 1970 1800 135.6 — — — — -58 +55 +20 55.8% +0.34 9–10 (47%) 2–6 (25%) 95.2 -1.60 1974 1736 132.1 — — — — +4 +28 -65 56.6% +0.54 12–15 (44%) 10–10 (50%) 96.5 +4.96
27 1971 1819 144.9 — — — — -45 +46 -4 47.1% -0.09 6–6 (50%) 13–13 (50%) 99.1 -7.38 1975 1681 128.8 — — — — +35 +35 — 55.5% +0.13 8–11 (42%) 12–8 (60%) 98.5 +4.19
28 1972 1874 146.7 — — — — -12 +65 -36 56.3% +0.44 18–12 (60%) 15–11 (58%) 105.7 -2.93 1976 1662 123.9 — — — — +24 +51 — 48.1% -0.46 3–5 (38%) 5–2 (71%) 98.1 +0.18
29 1973 1894 146.3 — — — — +69 -87 +21 61.9% +0.79 18–9 (67%) 14–12 (54%) 105.1 -0.99 1977 1684 129.0 — — — — -46 +78 -90 49.0% -0.44 8–6 (57%) 8–3 (73%) 103.8 +1.27
30 1974 1833 142.2 — — — — +74 -51 +60 60.8% +0.62 3–7 (30%) 14–9 (61%) 95.2 -0.76 1978 1671 125.2 — — — — — +46 — 47.6% -0.36 4–2 (67%) 2–2 (50%) 100.6 +0.04
31 1975 1934 154.0 — — — — +99 -157 -28 66.7% +1.39 6–3 (67%) 4–6 (40%) 100.5 -0.83 1979 1630 98.1 — — — — +11 +12 — 44.4% -1.17 0–2 3–0 (100%) — +1.64
32 1976 1965 146.6 — — — — +85 -198 -95 52.6% -0.01 12–4 (75%) 8–6 (57%) 107.0 -3.40 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 1977 1828 146.3 — — — — +94 -114 +115 57.0% +0.45 11–3 (79%) 7–11 (39%) 100.4 -0.20 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 1978 1770 142.3 — — — — +56 -48 +123 50.0% +0.15 3–5 (38%) 5–1 (83%) 100.0 -1.06 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 1979 1790 141.2 — — — — +18 -86 +110 53.0% +0.22 3–6 (33%) 6–6 (50%) 93.7 -1.30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
36 1980 1676 120.6 — — — — +49 -19 +194 46.8% -0.26 4–4 (50%) 7–6 (54%) 98.6 +1.71 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
37 1981 1599 106.1 — — — — — — — 21.4% -1.79 0–2 1–1 — -0.05 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 2023 146.1 — — — — +46 -36 +21 57.2% +0.50 114–85 (57%) 96–88 (52%) 101.1 -1.75 — 1883 129.5 — — — — +9 +37 -95 52.5% +0.06 52–57 (48%) 45–35 (56%) 99.8 +6.22

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.