H2H data updated: 2026-07-17 14:15 UTC

Mark Cox vs Ken Rosewall H2H: 2-7

Ken Rosewall holds a 7–2 lead over Mark Cox in their ATP head-to-head. Across 9 main-draw meetings, Ken Rosewall leads 3–0 on carpet and 2–1 on hard courts. Most recently, Ken Rosewall won the 1973 Milan Wct quarterfinal 6-2 7-6(4).

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Mark Cox
GBR Age 83 Left-Handed 185 cm / 6'1"
H2H
2 – 7
9 main draw meetings
Ken Rosewall
AUS Age 91 Right-Handed 170 cm / 5'7"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Feb 3, 1973* Milan Wct ATP 250 QF Carpet Ken Rosewall 6-2 7-6(4) Mark Cox Match data
Jan 23, 1973* London Wct ATP 250 QF Hard Mark Cox 7-5 0-6 6-4 Ken Rosewall Match data
Sep 3, 1972* US Open Grand Slam R64 Grass Mark Cox 6-7 6-2 4-6 6-2 6-2 Ken Rosewall Match data
Mar 25, 1972* Hilton Head ATP 250 R16 Clay Ken Rosewall 6-4 6-4 Mark Cox Match data
Mar 20, 1972* Chicago Wct ATP 250 R16 Carpet Ken Rosewall 3-6 6-4 6-1 Mark Cox Match data
Aug 11, 1971* Boston Wct ATP 250 R32 Hard Ken Rosewall 6-3 6-3 Mark Cox Match data
Nov 6, 1970* Stockholm Open ATP 250 QF Hard Ken Rosewall 6-3 6-4 Mark Cox Match data
Jul 10, 1970* Newport ATP 250 QF Grass Ken Rosewall 10-8 9-7 Mark Cox Match data
Jun 7, 1970* St. Louis Wct ATP 250 R16 Carpet Ken Rosewall 6-4 6-2 Mark Cox Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Mark Cox #486 #12 0 2,009 408 274 59.8% 0 0 0 0 15 15
Ken Rosewall #255 #2 0 2,231 541 195 73.5% 4 1 0 0 35 40

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Mark Cox Ken Rosewall
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
24 1968 52–23 69.3% — 1,722 0 2 — — — — — — —
25 1969 35–16 68.6% — 1,836 0 4 — — — — — — —
26 1970 39–31 55.7% — 1,796 0 5 — — — — — — —
27 1971 27–31 46.6% — 1,815 0 5 — — — — — — —
28 1972 43–29 59.7% — 1,871 0 7 — — — — — — —
29 1973 56–28 66.7% #22 1,890 0 10 — — — — — — —
30 1974 25–17 59.5% #30 1,828 0 10 — — — — — — —
31 1975 31–13 70.5% #25 1,915 0 13 — — — — — — —
32 1976 22–15 59.5% #17 1,954 0 14 — — — — — — —
33 1977 35–21 62.5% #26 1,823 0 15 1968 45–12 78.9% — 1,856 1 5
34 1978 15–16 48.4% #68 1,765 0 15 1969 49–21 70.0% — 1,941 1 8
35 1979 17–16 51.5% #76 1,786 0 15 1970 72–21 77.4% — 2,083 2 14
36 1980 11–13 45.8% #140 1,673 0 15 1971 80–24 76.9% — 2,154 3 22
37 1981 0–5 0.0% #140 1,597 0 15 1972 61–15 80.3% — 2,107 4 29
38 — — — — — — — 1973 65–17 79.3% #6 2,102 4 34
39 — — — — — — — 1974 28–8 77.8% #9 2,106 4 34
40 — — — — — — — 1975 41–12 77.4% #6 1,994 4 37
41 — — — — — — — 1976 35–18 66.0% #13 1,974 4 39
42 — — — — — — — 1977 39–20 66.1% #12 1,975 4 40
43 — — — — — — — 1978 19–19 50.0% #34 1,808 4 40
44 — — — — — — — 1979 4–5 44.4% #207 1,746 4 40
45 — — — — — — — 1980 3–3 50.0% #255 1,746 4 40