H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Mark Cox vs Raul Ramirez H2H: 1-2
Raul Ramirez holds a 2–1 lead over Mark Cox in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Raul Ramirez leads 2–0 on grass, while Mark Cox leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Raul Ramirez won the 1980 Surbiton fourth round 6-4 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
GBR
Age 83
Left-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H
1
–
2
3 main draw meetings
MEX
Age 73
Right-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 20, 1980* | Surbiton | ATP 250 | R16 | Grass | Raul Ramirez | 6-4 6-4 | Mark Cox | Match data |
| Jun 19, 1977* | Queen's Club | ATP 250 | F | Grass | Raul Ramirez | 9-7 7-5 | Mark Cox | Match data |
| Aug 22, 1973* | Toronto | Masters 1000 | R64 | Clay | Mark Cox | 6-1 6-3 | Raul Ramirez | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mark Cox | #486 | #12 | 0 | 2,009 | 408 | 274 | 59.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 15 | 15 |
| Raul Ramirez | #744 | #4 | 0 | 2,146 | 531 | 261 | 67.0% | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 19 | 20 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Mark Cox | Raul Ramirez | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1970 | 1–1 | 50.0% | — | 1,510 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1971 | 1–4 | 20.0% | — | 1,496 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1972 | 8–9 | 47.1% | — | 1,590 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1973 | 31–18 | 63.3% | #26 | 1,874 | 0 | 2 |
| 21 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1974 | 69–35 | 66.3% | #19 | 1,950 | 0 | 4 |
| 22 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1975 | 67–29 | 69.8% | #13 | 1,983 | 0 | 8 |
| 23 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1976 | 96–33 | 74.4% | #5 | 2,054 | 0 | 12 |
| 24 | 1968 | 52–23 | 69.3% | — | 1,722 | 0 | 2 | 1977 | 65–25 | 72.2% | #8 | 1,984 | 0 | 14 |
| 25 | 1969 | 35–16 | 68.6% | — | 1,836 | 0 | 4 | 1978 | 70–29 | 70.7% | #8 | 1,949 | 0 | 16 |
| 26 | 1970 | 39–31 | 55.7% | — | 1,796 | 0 | 5 | 1979 | 32–25 | 56.1% | #40 | 1,878 | 0 | 17 |
| 27 | 1971 | 27–31 | 46.6% | — | 1,815 | 0 | 5 | 1980 | 29–18 | 61.7% | #35 | 1,789 | 0 | 18 |
| 28 | 1972 | 43–29 | 59.7% | — | 1,871 | 0 | 7 | 1981 | 23–17 | 57.5% | #32 | 1,870 | 0 | 18 |
| 29 | 1973 | 56–28 | 66.7% | #22 | 1,890 | 0 | 10 | 1982 | 28–13 | 68.3% | #26 | 1,809 | 0 | 19 |
| 30 | 1974 | 25–17 | 59.5% | #30 | 1,828 | 0 | 10 | 1983 | 11–5 | 68.8% | #74 | 1,837 | 0 | 20 |
| 31 | 1975 | 31–13 | 70.5% | #25 | 1,915 | 0 | 13 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 1976 | 22–15 | 59.5% | #17 | 1,954 | 0 | 14 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 33 | 1977 | 35–21 | 62.5% | #26 | 1,823 | 0 | 15 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 34 | 1978 | 15–16 | 48.4% | #68 | 1,765 | 0 | 15 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 35 | 1979 | 17–16 | 51.5% | #76 | 1,786 | 0 | 15 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 36 | 1980 | 11–13 | 45.8% | #140 | 1,673 | 0 | 15 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 37 | 1981 | 0–5 | 0.0% | #140 | 1,597 | 0 | 15 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |