H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Mark Dickson vs Jay Lapidus H2H: 1-0
Mark Dickson holds a 1–0 lead over Jay Lapidus in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Mark Dickson leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Mark Dickson won the 1985 Forest Hills second round 6-3 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
USA
Age 66
Right-Handed
190 cm / 6'3"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
USA
Age 67
Left-Handed
188 cm / 6'2"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 8, 1985* | Forest Hills | ATP 250 | R64 | Clay | Mark Dickson | 6-3 6-2 | Jay Lapidus | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mark Dickson | #1,095 | #32 | 0 | 1,817 | 128 | 118 | 52.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
| Jay Lapidus | #621 | #34 | 0 | 1,798 | 76 | 106 | 41.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Mark Dickson | Jay Lapidus | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1978 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #272 | 1,494 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1979 | 6–6 | 50.0% | #184 | 1,559 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1981 | 1–3 | 25.0% | — | 1,501 | 0 | 0 | 1980 | 2–7 | 22.2% | #283 | 1,547 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1982 | 14–13 | 51.9% | #41 | 1,689 | 0 | 0 | 1981 | 9–12 | 42.9% | #283 | 1,608 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1983 | 28–27 | 50.9% | #66 | 1,699 | 0 | 0 | 1982 | 26–17 | 60.5% | #40 | 1,777 | 0 | 1 |
| 24 | 1984 | 36–22 | 62.1% | #35 | 1,810 | 0 | 2 | 1983 | 0–7 | 0.0% | #81 | 1,635 | 0 | 1 |
| 25 | 1985 | 23–23 | 50.0% | #74 | 1,717 | 0 | 2 | 1984 | 13–12 | 52.0% | #65 | 1,672 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | 1986 | 8–11 | 42.1% | #131 | 1,613 | 0 | 2 | 1985 | 11–25 | 30.6% | #150 | 1,621 | 0 | 1 |
| 27 | 1987 | 9–10 | 47.4% | #155 | 1,618 | 0 | 2 | 1986 | 5–7 | 41.7% | #145 | 1,626 | 0 | 1 |
| 28 | 1988 | 9–9 | 50.0% | #141 | 1,624 | 0 | 2 | 1987 | 4–12 | 25.0% | #234 | 1,551 | 0 | 1 |