H2H data updated: 2026-09-02 00:00 UTC

Mark Dickson vs Jay Lapidus H2H: 1-0

Mark Dickson holds a 1–0 lead over Jay Lapidus in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Mark Dickson leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Mark Dickson won the 1985 Forest Hills round of 64 6-3 6-2.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Mark Dickson
USA Age 66 Right-Handed 190 cm / 6'3"
H2H
1 – 0
1 main draw meetings
Jay Lapidus
USA Age 67 Left-Handed 188 cm / 6'2"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Mark Dickson #46 6-3 6-2 Jay Lapidus #71 Match data May 8, 1985* R64 Forest Hills ATP 250 Clay

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Mark Dickson #1,095 #32 0 1,818 128 118 52.0% 0 0 0 0 2 2
Jay Lapidus #621 #34 0 1,780 76 106 41.8% 0 0 0 0 1 1

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Mark Dickson Jay Lapidus
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
19 — — — — — — — 1978 0–1 0.0% #272 1,494 0 0
20 — — — — — — — 1979 6–6 50.0% #184 1,560 0 0
21 1981 1–3 25.0% — 1,501 0 0 1980 2–7 22.2% #283 1,548 0 0
22 1982 14–13 51.9% #41 1,688 0 0 1981 9–12 42.9% — 1,609 0 0
23 1983 28–27 50.9% #66 1,699 0 0 1982 26–17 60.5% #40 1,760 0 1
24 1984 36–22 62.1% #35 1,812 0 2 1983 0–7 0.0% #81 1,623 0 1
25 1985 23–23 50.0% #74 1,717 0 2 1984 13–12 52.0% #65 1,669 0 1
26 1986 8–11 42.1% #131 1,613 0 2 1985 11–25 30.6% #150 1,621 0 1
27 1987 9–10 47.4% #155 1,619 0 2 1986 5–7 41.7% #145 1,625 0 1
28 1988 9–9 50.0% #141 1,624 0 2 1987 4–12 25.0% #234 1,550 0 1

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Mark Dickson Jay Lapidus
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1978 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
20 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1979 0 1 1 0.0% 5 4 9 55.6% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
21 1981 0 1 1 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — 1980 1 1 2 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
22 1982 7 6 13 53.8% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — 5 5 10 50.0% 1981 3 5 8 37.5% 5 5 10 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
23 1983 7 4 11 63.6% 11 12 23 47.8% 1 4 5 20.0% 9 7 16 56.3% 1982 16 7 23 69.6% 3 4 7 42.9% 4 3 7 57.1% 3 3 6 50.0%
24 1984 13 6 19 68.4% 14 8 22 63.6% 1 1 2 50.0% 8 7 15 53.3% 1983 0 4 4 0.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0%
25 1985 6 10 16 37.5% 8 6 14 57.1% 5 2 7 71.4% 4 5 9 44.4% 1984 7 3 10 70.0% 4 5 9 44.4% 2 3 5 40.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
26 1986 4 4 8 50.0% 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — 2 4 6 33.3% 1985 3 12 15 20.0% 0 3 3 0.0% 4 5 9 44.4% 4 5 9 44.4%
27 1987 3 4 7 42.9% 3 4 7 42.9% — — — — 3 2 5 60.0% 1986 3 5 8 37.5% — — — — 2 2 4 50.0% — — — —
28 1988 3 6 9 33.3% 2 2 4 50.0% 4 1 5 80.0% — — — — 1987 3 7 10 30.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — —
Career — 43 41 84 51.2% 43 39 82 52.4% 11 8 19 57.9% 31 30 61 50.8% — 36 45 81 44.4% 17 26 43 39.5% 16 22 38 42.1% 7 13 20 35.0%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Mark Dickson Jay Lapidus
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1978 1494 100.9 — — — — — — — 33.3% 0.00 0–1 0–2 — -0.10
20 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1979 1560 123.2 — — — — — +34 — 48.1% -0.78 1–2 (33%) 4–1 (80%) — +0.12
21 1981 1501 116.6 — — — — — +36 — 30.0% -1.00 1–1 0–1 — -0.12 1980 1548 114.6 — — — — -27 — -18 34.8% -1.26 0–3 (0%) 3–1 (75%) — -0.54
22 1982 1689 143.1 — — — — +21 -140 — 50.8% +0.20 4–7 (36%) 7–5 (58%) — +0.03 1981 1609 120.7 — — — — -79 +4 — 43.9% -0.79 6–5 (55%) 3–1 (75%) — -0.65
23 1983 1699 149.0 — — — — +76 -61 -176 51.8% +0.23 6–9 (40%) 12–13 (48%) — -1.74 1982 1760 131.6 — — — — -34 -136 -200 57.0% +0.20 6–4 (60%) 8–4 (67%) — +1.42
24 1984 1812 143.4 — — — — +12 -64 — 58.3% +0.53 16–13 (55%) 10–10 (50%) — +2.51 1983 1624 105.1 — — — — -6 — — 15.8% -2.31 0–2 2–0 — -0.08
25 1985 1718 135.5 — — — — -39 -4 -56 51.4% +0.06 5–6 (45%) 8–10 (44%) — -0.14 1984 1670 120.2 — — — — +11 -60 -141 54.4% +0.40 2–2 (50%) 2–4 (33%) — +1.43
26 1986 1614 109.2 — — — — -4 +68 — 48.9% -0.47 2–7 (22%) 5–1 (83%) — +2.89 1985 1622 129.4 — — — — -58 -59 +6 35.4% -0.88 5–7 (42%) 5–9 (36%) — -1.39
27 1987 1619 119.2 — — — — +3 +34 — 49.0% -0.06 5–6 (45%) 2–4 (33%) — +0.68 1986 1625 117.1 — — — — -69 — +27 45.5% -0.30 2–2 (50%) 4–2 (67%) — +0.19
28 1988 1625 120.2 — — — — -46 +29 +71 52.4% +0.10 1–3 (25%) 3–2 (60%) — -0.23 1987 1551 114.3 — — — — -8 — +42 32.5% -1.10 1–3 (25%) 1–3 (25%) — -0.11
Career — 1819 142.5 — — — — +11 -32 -54 52.5% +0.17 40–52 (43%) 47–46 (51%) 97.9 +1.58 — 1781 129.6 — — — — -37 -35 -56 44.0% -0.52 23–31 (43%) 32–27 (54%) 102.4 +0.16

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.