H2H data updated: 2026-09-06 00:00 UTC

Mark Dickson vs Jose Lopez Maeso H2H: 1-0

Mark Dickson holds a 1–0 lead over Jose Lopez Maeso in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Mark Dickson leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Mark Dickson won the 1986 Palermo round of 32 7-5 6-4.

USA Age 66 Right-Handed 190 cm / 6'3"
H2H
1 0
1 main-draw meetings
ESP Age 69 Right-Handed

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Mark Dickson #89 7-5 6-4 Jose Lopez Maeso Match data Oct 2, 1986* R32 Palermo ATP 250 Clay

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Mark Dickson #1,095 #32 0 1,818 128 118 52.0% 0 0 0 0 2 2
Jose Lopez Maeso 1,716 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Mark Dickson Jose Lopez Maeso
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
21 1981 1–3 25.0% 1,501 0 0
22 1982 14–13 51.9% #41 1,688 0 0
23 1983 28–27 50.9% #66 1,699 0 0
24 1984 36–22 62.1% #35 1,812 0 2
25 1985 23–23 50.0% #74 1,717 0 2
26 1986 8–11 42.1% #131 1,613 0 2
27 1987 9–10 47.4% #155 1,619 0 2
28 1988 9–9 50.0% #141 1,624 0 2

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Mark Dickson Jose Lopez Maeso
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
21 1981 0 1 1 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3%
22 1982 7 6 13 53.8% 2 2 4 50.0% 5 5 10 50.0% 1979 0 1 1 0.0% 1 4 5 20.0%
23 1983 7 4 11 63.6% 11 12 23 47.8% 1 4 5 20.0% 9 7 16 56.3% 1980 0 1 1 0.0% 0 3 3 0.0% 3 1 4 75.0%
24 1984 13 6 19 68.4% 14 8 22 63.6% 1 1 2 50.0% 8 7 15 53.3% 1981 3 3 6 50.0% 14 13 27 51.9% 0 1 1 0.0%
25 1985 6 10 16 37.5% 8 6 14 57.1% 5 2 7 71.4% 4 5 9 44.4% 1982 2 3 5 40.0% 13 12 25 52.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
26 1986 4 4 8 50.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 2 4 6 33.3% 1983 0 5 5 0.0%
27 1987 3 4 7 42.9% 3 4 7 42.9% 3 2 5 60.0% 1984 1 1 2 50.0% 1 3 4 25.0%
28 1988 3 6 9 33.3% 2 2 4 50.0% 4 1 5 80.0% 1985 7 11 18 38.9% 0 1 1 0.0%
29 1986 0 1 1 0.0% 6 10 16 37.5% 0 1 1 0.0%
30 1987 2 1 3 66.7% 0 3 3 0.0%
31 1988 1 1 2 50.0%
32 1989 0 1 1 0.0%
Career 43 41 84 51.2% 43 39 82 52.4% 11 8 19 57.9% 31 30 61 50.8% 8 11 19 42.1% 43 66 109 39.4% 2 5 7 28.6% 4 3 7 57.1%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Mark Dickson Jose Lopez Maeso
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
21 1981 1501 116.6 +36 30.0% -1.00 1–1 0–1 -0.12
22 1982 1689 143.1 +21 -140 50.8% +0.20 4–7 (36%) 7–5 (58%) 101.5 +0.03 1979 1461 99.5 +28 26.7% -1.47 0–1 1–1 +0.42
23 1983 1699 149.0 +76 -61 -176 51.8% +0.23 6–9 (40%) 12–13 (48%) 99.4 -1.74 1980 1519 121.9 +78 -53 33.3% -1.33 1–0 0–1 -0.24
24 1984 1812 143.4 +12 -64 58.3% +0.53 16–13 (55%) 10–10 (50%) 101.4 +2.51 1981 1701 141.0 -74 -16 46.3% -0.55 10–4 (71%) 1–3 (25%) 109.1 -1.31
25 1985 1718 135.5 -39 -4 -56 51.4% +0.06 5–6 (45%) 8–10 (44%) 95.7 -0.14 1982 1692 135.5 -97 +24 -175 47.6% +0.01 6–4 (60%) 1–12 (8%) 95.0 -0.51
26 1986 1614 109.2 -4 +68 48.9% -0.47 2–7 (22%) 5–1 (83%) 95.3 +2.89 1983 1595 98.2 +9 9.1% -1.91 0–1 0–1 +0.64
27 1987 1619 119.2 +3 +34 49.0% -0.06 5–6 (45%) 2–4 (33%) 99.1 +0.68 1984 1592 117.6 +5 35.7% -0.36 1–1 0–2 -0.01
28 1988 1625 120.2 -46 +29 +71 52.4% +0.10 1–3 (25%) 3–2 (60%) 98.6 -0.23 1985 1547 122.2 +19 39.1% -0.54 2–3 (40%) 1–4 (20%) 98.0 +0.14
29 1986 1510 114.2 +25 38.6% -0.36 2–4 (33%) 2–2 (50%) 97.7 +1.58
30 1987 1494 105.9 +92 +6 46.7% -0.60 0–3 (0%) +0.79
31 1988 1492 99.3 40.0% -0.40 1–0 +0.50
32 1989 1486 100.4 0.0% -4.50 -0.10
Career 1819 142.5 +11 -32 -54 52.5% +0.17 40–52 (43%) 47–46 (51%) 97.9 +1.58 1716 132.4 -22 +9 -175 41.1% -0.53 23–21 (52%) 6–26 (19%) 94.8 +1.34

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.