H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 14:16 UTC
Mark Dickson vs Pavel Slozil H2H: 1-1
Mark Dickson and Pavel Slozil are tied 1–1 in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Pavel Slozil leads 1–0 on carpet, while Mark Dickson leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Mark Dickson won the 1984 Rome fourth round 6-3 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
USA
Age 66
Right-Handed
190 cm / 6'3"
H2H
1
–
1
2 main draw meetings
CZE
Age 70
Right-Handed
173 cm / 5'8"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 18, 1984* | Rome | Masters 1000 | R16 | Clay | Mark Dickson | 6-3 6-2 | Pavel Slozil | Match data |
| Oct 28, 1983* | Cologne | ATP 250 | R16 | Carpet | Pavel Slozil | 6-4 6-4 | Mark Dickson | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mark Dickson | #1,095 | #32 | 0 | 1,817 | 128 | 118 | 52.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
| Pavel Slozil | #550 | #12 | 0 | 1,790 | 142 | 160 | 47.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Mark Dickson | Pavel Slozil | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1975 | 1–6 | 14.3% | #218 | 1,481 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1976 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #310 | 1,444 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1981 | 1–3 | 25.0% | — | 1,501 | 0 | 0 | 1977 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #226 | 1,418 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1982 | 14–13 | 51.9% | #41 | 1,689 | 0 | 0 | 1978 | 5–5 | 50.0% | #190 | 1,509 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1983 | 28–27 | 50.9% | #66 | 1,699 | 0 | 0 | 1979 | 19–18 | 51.4% | #78 | 1,655 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1984 | 36–22 | 62.1% | #35 | 1,810 | 0 | 2 | 1980 | 10–10 | 50.0% | #68 | 1,700 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 1985 | 23–23 | 50.0% | #74 | 1,717 | 0 | 2 | 1981 | 18–16 | 52.9% | #68 | 1,719 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | 1986 | 8–11 | 42.1% | #131 | 1,613 | 0 | 2 | 1982 | 19–18 | 51.4% | #49 | 1,677 | 0 | 1 |
| 27 | 1987 | 9–10 | 47.4% | #155 | 1,618 | 0 | 2 | 1983 | 22–21 | 51.2% | #81 | 1,679 | 0 | 1 |
| 28 | 1988 | 9–9 | 50.0% | #141 | 1,624 | 0 | 2 | 1984 | 21–17 | 55.3% | #40 | 1,732 | 0 | 1 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1985 | 18–26 | 40.9% | #95 | 1,643 | 0 | 2 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1986 | 8–16 | 33.3% | #165 | 1,587 | 0 | 2 |