H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Mark Dickson vs Peter Elter H2H: 3-0
Mark Dickson holds a 3–0 lead over Peter Elter in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Mark Dickson leads 2–0 on carpet and 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Mark Dickson won the 1986 Metz fourth round 7-6 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
USA
Age 66
Right-Handed
190 cm / 6'3"
H2H
3
–
0
3 main draw meetings
GER
Age 68
Right-Handed
178 cm / 5'10"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 14, 1986* | Metz | ATP 250 | R16 | Carpet | Mark Dickson | 7-6 6-3 | Peter Elter | Match data |
| May 24, 1985* | Florence | ATP 250 | R16 | Clay | Mark Dickson | 6-3 6-3 | Peter Elter | Match data |
| Mar 18, 1983* | Munich Wct | ATP 250 | R16 | Carpet | Mark Dickson | 6-3 7-6 | Peter Elter | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mark Dickson | #1,095 | #32 | 0 | 1,817 | 128 | 118 | 52.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
| Peter Elter | #769 | #51 | 0 | 1,790 | 88 | 114 | 43.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Mark Dickson | Peter Elter | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1976 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #310 | 1,479 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1977 | 6–9 | 40.0% | #158 | 1,575 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1978 | 9–9 | 50.0% | #114 | 1,574 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1981 | 1–3 | 25.0% | — | 1,501 | 0 | 0 | 1979 | 12–16 | 42.9% | #117 | 1,636 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1982 | 14–13 | 51.9% | #41 | 1,689 | 0 | 0 | 1980 | 14–13 | 51.9% | #110 | 1,662 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1983 | 28–27 | 50.9% | #66 | 1,699 | 0 | 0 | 1981 | 9–9 | 50.0% | #77 | 1,718 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1984 | 36–22 | 62.1% | #35 | 1,810 | 0 | 2 | 1982 | 18–19 | 48.6% | #83 | 1,680 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 1985 | 23–23 | 50.0% | #74 | 1,717 | 0 | 2 | 1983 | 11–15 | 42.3% | #91 | 1,624 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 1986 | 8–11 | 42.1% | #131 | 1,613 | 0 | 2 | 1984 | 4–8 | 33.3% | #113 | 1,598 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 1987 | 9–10 | 47.4% | #155 | 1,618 | 0 | 2 | 1985 | 2–11 | 15.4% | #179 | 1,488 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 1988 | 9–9 | 50.0% | #141 | 1,624 | 0 | 2 | 1986 | 3–3 | 50.0% | #155 | 1,532 | 0 | 0 |