H2H data updated: 2026-09-03 00:00 UTC

Mark Dickson vs Robert Vant Hof H2H: 1-0

Mark Dickson holds a 1–0 lead over Robert Vant Hof in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Mark Dickson leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Mark Dickson won the 1982 US Open round of 64 2-6 6-4 6-4 1-1 RET.

USA Age 66 Right-Handed 190 cm / 6'3"
H2H
1 0
1 main draw meetings

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Mark Dickson #40 2-6 6-4 6-4 1-1 (ret.) Robert Vant Hof Match data Sep 4, 1982* R64 US Open Grand Slam Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Mark Dickson #1,095 #32 0 1,818 128 118 52.0% 0 0 0 0 2 2
Robert Vant Hof 1,879 0 0 0 0 2 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Mark Dickson Robert Vant Hof
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
1981 1–3 25.0% 1,501 0 0
1982 14–13 51.9% #41 1,688 0 0
1983 28–27 50.9% #66 1,699 0 0
1984 36–22 62.1% #35 1,812 0 2
1985 23–23 50.0% #74 1,717 0 2
1986 8–11 42.1% #131 1,613 0 2
1987 9–10 47.4% #155 1,619 0 2
1988 9–9 50.0% #141 1,624 0 2

Surface Results by Career Season

Rows are aligned in career order because complete birth data is unavailable. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Mark Dickson Robert Vant Hof
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
1981 0 1 1 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 1978 0 3 3 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
1982 7 6 13 53.8% 2 2 4 50.0% 5 5 10 50.0% 1979 0 1 1 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
1983 7 4 11 63.6% 11 12 23 47.8% 1 4 5 20.0% 9 7 16 56.3% 1980 8 5 13 61.5% 3 3 6 50.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 0 4 4 0.0%
1984 13 6 19 68.4% 14 8 22 63.6% 1 1 2 50.0% 8 7 15 53.3% 1981 4 7 11 36.4% 3 5 8 37.5% 2 3 5 40.0% 4 3 7 57.1%
1985 6 10 16 37.5% 8 6 14 57.1% 5 2 7 71.4% 4 5 9 44.4% 1982 11 7 18 61.1% 2 3 5 40.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 5 4 9 55.6%
1986 4 4 8 50.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 2 4 6 33.3% 1983 10 8 18 55.6% 3 1 4 75.0% 2 4 6 33.3%
1987 3 4 7 42.9% 3 4 7 42.9% 3 2 5 60.0% 1984 2 5 7 28.6% 2 3 5 40.0% 2 6 8 25.0%
1988 3 6 9 33.3% 2 2 4 50.0% 4 1 5 80.0% 1985 1 3 4 25.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
1987 0 2 2 0.0%
1988 1 2 3 33.3% 1 2 3 33.3%
1989 5 3 8 62.5% 0 3 3 0.0%
1990 0 1 1 0.0%
Career 43 41 84 51.2% 43 39 82 52.4% 11 8 19 57.9% 31 30 61 50.8% Career 42 43 85 49.4% 9 16 25 36.0% 8 14 22 36.4% 15 25 40 37.5%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Career Season

Rows are aligned in career order because complete birth data is unavailable. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Mark Dickson Robert Vant Hof
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
1981 1501 116.6 +36 30.0% -1.00 1–1 0–1 -0.12 1978 1492 112.1 +23 33.3% -1.00 0–2 1–3 (25%) +0.05
1982 1689 143.1 +21 -140 50.8% +0.20 4–7 (36%) 7–5 (58%) +0.03 1979 1507 114.7 36.4% -1.09 0–1 3–2 (60%) -0.60
1983 1699 149.0 +76 -61 -176 51.8% +0.23 6–9 (40%) 12–13 (48%) -1.74 1980 1593 123.7 -2 -34 -56 46.0% -0.57 3–3 (50%) 8–4 (67%) +1.15
1984 1812 143.4 +12 -64 58.3% +0.53 16–13 (55%) 10–10 (50%) +2.51 1981 1667 131.2 +13 -127 -104 43.0% -0.43 5–5 (50%) 2–6 (25%) -0.32
1985 1718 135.5 -39 -4 -56 51.4% +0.06 5–6 (45%) 8–10 (44%) -0.14 1982 1691 125.8 +19 -146 54.2% +0.33 6–2 (75%) 7–5 (58%) +3.05
1986 1614 109.2 -4 +68 48.9% -0.47 2–7 (22%) 5–1 (83%) +2.89 1983 1722 139.5 -34 -63 48.6% -0.15 8–3 (73%) 8–6 (57%) -1.98
1987 1619 119.2 +3 +34 49.0% -0.06 5–6 (45%) 2–4 (33%) +0.68 1984 1580 107.4 -11 +27 34.0% -0.87 3–4 (43%) 2–4 (33%) +0.46
1988 1625 120.2 -46 +29 +71 52.4% +0.10 1–3 (25%) 3–2 (60%) -0.23 1985 1520 97.1 +10 28.6% -1.29 1–2 (33%) 1–1 +0.84
1987 1498 104.8 28.6% -1.86 0–1 -0.12
1988 1524 125.6 +5 35.7% -0.71 1–1 1–2 (33%) -0.53
1989 1555 113.9 +30 -5 48.1% -0.37 2–5 (29%) 5–1 (83%) +0.26
1990 1536 95.9 0.0% -3.00 +0.20
Career 1819 142.5 +11 -32 -54 52.5% +0.17 40–52 (43%) 47–46 (51%) 97.9 +1.58 Career 1880 131.6 0 -86 -41 44.1% -0.42 29–29 (50%) 38–34 (53%) 102.6 +1.43

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.