H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC
Mark Dickson vs Victor Pecci H2H: 1-0
Mark Dickson holds a 1–0 lead over Victor Pecci in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Mark Dickson leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Mark Dickson won the 1981 Madrid third round 6-1 3-6 13-11.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
USA
Age 66
Right-Handed
190 cm / 6'3"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
PAR
Age 70
Right-Handed
193 cm / 6'4"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 2, 1981* | Madrid | ATP 250 | R32 | Clay | Mark Dickson | 6-1 3-6 13-11 | Victor Pecci | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mark Dickson | #1,095 | #32 | 0 | 1,817 | 128 | 118 | 52.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
| Victor Pecci | #666 | #9 | 0 | 2,085 | 354 | 244 | 59.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 10 | 10 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Mark Dickson | Victor Pecci | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1972 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,480 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1973 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,468 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1974 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #318 | 1,480 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1975 | 21–21 | 50.0% | #55 | 1,701 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1976 | 46–29 | 61.3% | #34 | 1,813 | 0 | 2 |
| 21 | 1981 | 1–3 | 25.0% | — | 1,501 | 0 | 0 | 1977 | 38–26 | 59.4% | #39 | 1,777 | 0 | 2 |
| 22 | 1982 | 14–13 | 51.9% | #41 | 1,689 | 0 | 0 | 1978 | 30–24 | 55.6% | #46 | 1,874 | 0 | 3 |
| 23 | 1983 | 28–27 | 50.9% | #66 | 1,699 | 0 | 0 | 1979 | 56–19 | 74.7% | #11 | 1,991 | 0 | 6 |
| 24 | 1984 | 36–22 | 62.1% | #35 | 1,810 | 0 | 2 | 1980 | 37–20 | 64.9% | #29 | 1,837 | 0 | 7 |
| 25 | 1985 | 23–23 | 50.0% | #74 | 1,717 | 0 | 2 | 1981 | 48–20 | 70.6% | #16 | 1,820 | 0 | 9 |
| 26 | 1986 | 8–11 | 42.1% | #131 | 1,613 | 0 | 2 | 1982 | 19–19 | 50.0% | #68 | 1,699 | 0 | 9 |
| 27 | 1987 | 9–10 | 47.4% | #155 | 1,618 | 0 | 2 | 1983 | 18–15 | 54.5% | #56 | 1,703 | 0 | 10 |
| 28 | 1988 | 9–9 | 50.0% | #141 | 1,624 | 0 | 2 | 1984 | 17–12 | 58.6% | #38 | 1,774 | 0 | 10 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1985 | 12–19 | 38.7% | #110 | 1,607 | 0 | 10 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1986 | 4–6 | 40.0% | #140 | 1,577 | 0 | 10 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1987 | 6–8 | 42.9% | #256 | 1,545 | 0 | 10 |