H2H data updated: 2026-09-05 00:00 UTC

Mark Dickson vs Vincent Van Patten H2H: 0-1

Vincent Van Patten holds a 1–0 lead over Mark Dickson in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Vincent Van Patten leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Vincent Van Patten won the 1985 Miami Open round of 64 6-2 7-6.

USA Age 66 Right-Handed 190 cm / 6'3"
H2H
0 1
1 main draw meetings
USA Age 68 Right-Handed

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Vincent Van Patten 6-2 7-6 Mark Dickson #35 Match data Feb 6, 1985* R64 Miami Open ATP 500 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Mark Dickson #1,095 #32 0 1,818 128 118 52.0% 0 0 0 0 2 2
Vincent Van Patten 1,850 0 0 0 0 1 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Mark Dickson Vincent Van Patten
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
21 1981 1–3 25.0% 1,501 0 0
22 1982 14–13 51.9% #41 1,688 0 0
23 1983 28–27 50.9% #66 1,699 0 0
24 1984 36–22 62.1% #35 1,812 0 2
25 1985 23–23 50.0% #74 1,717 0 2
26 1986 8–11 42.1% #131 1,613 0 2
27 1987 9–10 47.4% #155 1,619 0 2
28 1988 9–9 50.0% #141 1,624 0 2

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Mark Dickson Vincent Van Patten
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
20 1978 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
21 1981 0 1 1 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 1979 9 7 16 56.3% 7 5 12 58.3%
22 1982 7 6 13 53.8% 2 2 4 50.0% 5 5 10 50.0% 1980 9 9 18 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 12 6 18 66.7%
23 1983 7 4 11 63.6% 11 12 23 47.8% 1 4 5 20.0% 9 7 16 56.3% 1981 3 5 8 37.5% 3 4 7 42.9% 6 2 8 75.0%
24 1984 13 6 19 68.4% 14 8 22 63.6% 1 1 2 50.0% 8 7 15 53.3% 1982 6 7 13 46.2% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 10 8 18 55.6%
25 1985 6 10 16 37.5% 8 6 14 57.1% 5 2 7 71.4% 4 5 9 44.4% 1983 7 7 14 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 5 8 13 38.5%
26 1986 4 4 8 50.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 2 4 6 33.3% 1984 6 7 13 46.2% 0 1 1 0.0% 2 2 4 50.0%
27 1987 3 4 7 42.9% 3 4 7 42.9% 3 2 5 60.0% 1985 5 7 12 41.7% 0 2 2 0.0% 2 1 3 66.7% 1 2 3 33.3%
28 1988 3 6 9 33.3% 2 2 4 50.0% 4 1 5 80.0% 1986 1 4 5 20.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
29 1987 2 2 4 50.0%
Career 43 41 84 51.2% 43 39 82 52.4% 11 8 19 57.9% 31 30 61 50.8% 48 56 104 46.2% 3 10 13 23.1% 2 7 9 22.2% 44 35 79 55.7%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Mark Dickson Vincent Van Patten
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
20 1978 1466 103.0 14.3% -1.86 0–1 +0.38
21 1981 1501 116.6 +36 30.0% -1.00 1–1 0–1 -0.12 1979 1644 134.7 +45 58.0% +0.54 4–8 (33%) 1–8 (11%) 94.1 +2.80
22 1982 1689 143.1 +21 -140 50.8% +0.20 4–7 (36%) 7–5 (58%) 101.5 +0.03 1980 1754 136.3 +40 50.6% -0.26 8–2 (80%) 5–3 (63%) 108.6 +0.28
23 1983 1699 149.0 +76 -61 -176 51.8% +0.23 6–9 (40%) 12–13 (48%) 99.4 -1.74 1981 1832 146.6 +28 -287 47.3% -0.27 5–2 (71%) 1–1 -2.90
24 1984 1812 143.4 +12 -64 58.3% +0.53 16–13 (55%) 10–10 (50%) 101.4 +2.51 1982 1764 141.3 +80 47.2% -0.27 7–7 (50%) 6–7 (46%) 98.3 -0.12
25 1985 1718 135.5 -39 -4 -56 51.4% +0.06 5–6 (45%) 8–10 (44%) 95.7 -0.14 1983 1709 138.5 +58 41.8% -0.46 6–6 (50%) 2–3 (40%) 100.5 -1.08
26 1986 1614 109.2 -4 +68 48.9% -0.47 2–7 (22%) 5–1 (83%) 95.3 +2.89 1984 1677 127.3 +47 43.2% -0.48 3–2 (60%) 0–3 (0%) 97.5 -0.23
27 1987 1619 119.2 +3 +34 49.0% -0.06 5–6 (45%) 2–4 (33%) 99.1 +0.68 1985 1696 131.9 +11 -211 42.3% -0.65 2–2 (50%) 2–4 (33%) 99.4 -2.45
28 1988 1625 120.2 -46 +29 +71 52.4% +0.10 1–3 (25%) 3–2 (60%) 98.6 -0.23 1986 1646 112.4 +7 41.2% -1.18 0–3 (0%) 3–1 (75%) 97.8 -0.18
29 1987 1627 102.5 +13 50.0% -0.63 3–1 (75%) +0.72
Career 1819 142.5 +11 -32 -54 52.5% +0.17 40–52 (43%) 47–46 (51%) 97.9 +1.58 1851 143.5 +46 -287 -211 47.0% -0.30 35–33 (51%) 23–31 (43%) 99.7 -1.36

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.