H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 17:48 UTC
Mark Edmondson vs Buster C Mottram H2H: 0-2
Buster C Mottram holds a 2–0 lead over Mark Edmondson in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Buster C Mottram leads 2–0 on clay. Most recently, Buster C Mottram won the 1976 Indianapolis fourth round 6-4 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
AUS
Age 72
Right-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H
0
–
2
2 main draw meetings
GBR
Right-Handed
193 cm / 6'4"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 9, 1976 | Indianapolis | ATP 250 | R16 | Clay | Buster C Mottram | 6-4 6-3 | Mark Edmondson | Match data |
| Apr 23, 1976* | Palma | ATP 250 | QF | Clay | Buster C Mottram | 6-7 6-1 6-2 | Mark Edmondson | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mark Edmondson | #525 | #15 | 0 | 1,927 | 244 | 231 | 51.4% | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 6 |
| Buster C Mottram | #735 | #15 | 0 | 1,952 | 270 | 177 | 60.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Mark Edmondson | Buster C Mottram | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 1972 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,496 | 0 | 0 | 1970 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,497 | 0 | 0 |
| 1974 | 1–2 | 33.3% | — | 1,488 | 0 | 0 | 1971 | 2–1 | 66.7% | — | 1,536 | 0 | 0 |
| 1975 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #212 | 1,501 | 0 | 0 | 1972 | 1–2 | 33.3% | — | 1,548 | 0 | 0 |
| 1976 | 42–29 | 59.2% | #35 | 1,754 | 1 | 2 | 1973 | 14–11 | 56.0% | #33 | 1,658 | 0 | 0 |
| 1977 | 16–24 | 40.0% | #99 | 1,598 | 1 | 2 | 1974 | 14–13 | 51.9% | #55 | 1,767 | 0 | 0 |
| 1978 | 15–16 | 48.4% | #79 | 1,682 | 1 | 3 | 1975 | 26–15 | 63.4% | #34 | 1,897 | 0 | 2 |
| 1979 | 26–26 | 50.0% | #95 | 1,740 | 1 | 3 | 1976 | 33–16 | 67.3% | #41 | 1,852 | 0 | 3 |
| 1980 | 18–23 | 43.9% | #91 | 1,714 | 1 | 3 | 1977 | 46–22 | 67.6% | #20 | 1,909 | 0 | 3 |
| 1981 | 59–26 | 69.4% | #23 | 1,902 | 1 | 6 | 1978 | 29–18 | 61.7% | #28 | 1,812 | 0 | 3 |
| 1982 | 27–25 | 51.9% | #18 | 1,713 | 1 | 6 | 1979 | 34–21 | 61.8% | #32 | 1,873 | 0 | 3 |
| 1983 | 16–17 | 48.5% | #37 | 1,687 | 1 | 6 | 1980 | 25–18 | 58.1% | #43 | 1,824 | 0 | 3 |
| 1984 | 9–18 | 33.3% | #145 | 1,572 | 1 | 6 | 1981 | 13–13 | 50.0% | #72 | 1,773 | 0 | 3 |
| 1985 | 9–10 | 47.4% | #115 | 1,595 | 1 | 6 | 1982 | 28–16 | 63.6% | #20 | 1,840 | 0 | 3 |
| 1986 | 3–9 | 25.0% | #307 | 1,540 | 1 | 6 | 1983 | 5–10 | 33.3% | #91 | 1,703 | 0 | 3 |
| 1987 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #523 | 1,550 | 1 | 6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |