H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Mark Edmondson vs Jim Delaney H2H: 3-1
Mark Edmondson holds a 3–1 lead over Jim Delaney in their ATP head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on hard courts, while Mark Edmondson leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Mark Edmondson won the 1982 Hilton Head Wct third round 6-1 6-1.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
AUS
Age 72
Right-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H
3
–
1
4 main draw meetings
USA
Age 73
Right-Handed
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 30, 1982* | Hilton Head Wct | ATP 250 | R32 | Clay | Mark Edmondson | 6-1 6-1 | Jim Delaney | Match data |
| Sep 21, 1977* | Los Angeles | ATP 250 | R64 | Hard | Mark Edmondson | 6-1 4-6 6-0 | Jim Delaney | Match data |
| Oct 23, 1976* | Sydney Indoor | ATP 250 | SF | Hard | Jim Delaney | 2-6 6-3 6-3 | Mark Edmondson | Match data |
| Oct 15, 1976* | Brisbane | ATP 250 | R16 | Grass | Mark Edmondson | 6-3 6-3 | Jim Delaney | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mark Edmondson | #525 | #15 | 0 | 1,927 | 244 | 231 | 51.4% | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 6 |
| Jim Delaney | #262 | #59 | 0 | 1,676 | 78 | 131 | 37.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Mark Edmondson | Jim Delaney | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | 1972 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,496 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1972 | 1–5 | 16.7% | — | 1,453 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1974 | 1–2 | 33.3% | — | 1,488 | 0 | 0 | 1973 | 4–5 | 44.4% | #159 | 1,536 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1975 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #212 | 1,501 | 0 | 0 | 1974 | 9–7 | 56.2% | #109 | 1,590 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1976 | 42–29 | 59.2% | #35 | 1,754 | 1 | 2 | 1975 | 10–14 | 41.7% | #73 | 1,645 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1977 | 16–24 | 40.0% | #99 | 1,598 | 1 | 2 | 1976 | 20–29 | 40.8% | #64 | 1,631 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1978 | 15–16 | 48.4% | #79 | 1,682 | 1 | 3 | 1977 | 16–27 | 37.2% | #133 | 1,623 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 1979 | 26–26 | 50.0% | #95 | 1,740 | 1 | 3 | 1978 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #418 | 1,600 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 1980 | 18–23 | 43.9% | #91 | 1,714 | 1 | 3 | 1979 | 2–9 | 18.2% | #276 | 1,519 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 1981 | 59–26 | 69.4% | #23 | 1,902 | 1 | 6 | 1980 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #269 | 1,511 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 1982 | 27–25 | 51.9% | #18 | 1,713 | 1 | 6 | 1981 | 11–21 | 34.4% | #269 | 1,512 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 1983 | 16–17 | 48.5% | #37 | 1,687 | 1 | 6 | 1982 | 3–7 | 30.0% | #143 | 1,512 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | 1984 | 9–18 | 33.3% | #145 | 1,572 | 1 | 6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 1985 | 9–10 | 47.4% | #115 | 1,595 | 1 | 6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 1986 | 3–9 | 25.0% | #307 | 1,540 | 1 | 6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 33 | 1987 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #523 | 1,550 | 1 | 6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |